WMU Broncos

Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
From BC Enquirer 10-29
Author Message
toddjnsn Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,553
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 154
I Root For: WMU, MAC
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Post: #21
RE: From BC Enquirer 10-29
Quote:I think he has improved a little in the P.R. department.

I get your point about him being totally pleased about how things were going with the team -- and I think it was a rookie mistake. He wanted to keep the spirits high (he rides off that), and given the injuries and expecting Not to be a winning team, he liked how things were progressing in terms of attitude and keeping the heads in it, etc (assuming Behind the scenes). It should have been a double statement like "No, I'm not pleased, I'm not happy with what we have been accomplishing, or more importantly lack thereof -- but I like the toughness and the willingness to grow. It's an uphill battle, facing tons of adversity, and there's a lot of players who are muddling through this thing and learning well." And to be fair, he's probably said similar comments like that to reporters as well, as the season rolled on.

In the PR dept in general, I'll say this: He hasn't changed, which is what I like. The difference to most others is -- we're WINNING. Listen to the radio interview about the Idaho locker room. He admitted he broke the ceiling tile, and he may do it again (it was a small space he was in too), but took responsibility and will pay for it, etc. If we lost that game and were 0-2, the Fire Fleck thread would be lit up like sparkler. But we won. After playing Purdue tough, and winning that Idaho game -- PR is a whole lot different in how it's taken.

I think he has GREAT PR when a team improves and/or is winning. When it's on a losing streak -- people will bash a coach for his youthful exuberance. His PR, his attitude, his motion, his persona -- all depends on how we're playing on the field on game day, to most people. Right now, I'm loving it! Last year, I still liked it (it'd take multiple years in a row like last year for me to dislike it).
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2014 03:06 PM by toddjnsn.)
10-31-2014 01:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Colonel Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,142
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 31
I Root For: WMU Broncos
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Post: #22
RE: From BC Enquirer 10-29
(10-31-2014 12:52 AM)Stampede your face!! Wrote:  Looking back, he was clearly talking more about the process, and his plan...which wasn't one that was particularly concerned with wins/losses...he was consistent in his belief and talk...Problem is, our goals and his goals didn't match last year.

Fair enough - generally, I agree with this. I do like that he is telling the players (and us) not to be satisfied with bowl eligibility and to compete for a championship right now. No one should be 100% satisfied until we've reached the MAC mountaintop.
10-31-2014 03:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.