(10-27-2014 03:01 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:41 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Y'all say VT, UNC and SC suck but guess what... there's a somewhat decent chance that all 3 will go bowling. CUSA has 3 wins vs the AAC's worst teams. Congratulations?

Decent? I beg to differ!

Va Tech is 4-4 and still have to play Boston College and Virginia at home and Duke on the road. Va Tech just got smashed by Miami at home and the three teams above are just as good as Miami. You still think Va Tech got a decent shot at getting to a bowl game? Three of 4 Va Tech losses have come at home. That's not decent at all.

UNC is 4-4 and still has to play at Miami and Duke but get Pitt and NC State at home. I guess you can call that a decent shot at two wins. They ain't gonna beat Miami and Duke and NC State is a rival game. The State game could come down to one of those teams becoming bowl eligible.

SC is 4-4 but they have a very soft schedule the rest of the way so they will definitely go to a bowl game.

As far as the AAC's worst teams, I don't think Houston is one of the AAC's worst teams and we can't help that Tulsa and SMU has stunk it up. They represent the AAC and they got their asses kicked. Stop making excuses for losing three games to CUSA because deep down inside, it makes you sick that CUSA won those games.

You're on our board! That's obsession.

(10-27-2014 03:01 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:41 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Y'all say VT, UNC and SC suck but guess what... there's a somewhat decent chance that all 3 will go bowling. CUSA has 3 wins vs the AAC's worst teams. Congratulations?

Decent? I beg to differ!

Va Tech is 4-4 and still have to play Boston College and Virginia at home and Duke on the road. Va Tech just got smashed by Miami at home and the three teams above are just as good as Miami. You still think Va Tech got a decent shot at getting to a bowl game? Three of 4 Va Tech losses have come at home. That's not decent at all.

UNC is 4-4 and still has to play at Miami and Duke but get Pitt and NC State at home. I guess you can call that a decent shot at two wins. They ain't gonna beat Miami and Duke and NC State is a rival game. The State game could come down to one of those teams becoming bowl eligible.

SC is 4-4 but they have a very soft schedule the rest of the way so they will definitely go to a bowl game.

As far as the AAC's worst teams, I don't think Houston is one of the AAC's worst teams and we can't help that Tulsa and SMU has stunk it up.

I guess you missed my previous statement about before and after O'Korn was benched. He was horrible this year.

(10-27-2014 03:01 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  They represent the AAC and they got their asses kicked. Stop making excuses for losing three games to CUSA because deep down inside, it makes you sick that CUSA won those games.

To be honest with you, I really don't give 2 ***** what the rest of the AAC does as long as we've got a couple of decent conference games on the schedule. ECU doesn't have problems getting P5's to play us. If you guys honestly think that wins vs UNC and VT are the same as wins vs Little Miami and Ohio... more power to you.

(10-27-2014 03:13 PM)BeliefBlazer Wrote:  You're on our board! That's obsession.

lol, our boards are on the same site...you guys act like you have take 3 subway stops, and a couple hours on a bus to get here.

It's one click away from our board.

(10-27-2014 03:18 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 03:01 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:41 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Y'all say VT, UNC and SC suck but guess what... there's a somewhat decent chance that all 3 will go bowling. CUSA has 3 wins vs the AAC's worst teams. Congratulations?

Decent? I beg to differ!

Va Tech is 4-4 and still have to play Boston College and Virginia at home and Duke on the road. Va Tech just got smashed by Miami at home and the three teams above are just as good as Miami. You still think Va Tech got a decent shot at getting to a bowl game? Three of 4 Va Tech losses have come at home. That's not decent at all.

UNC is 4-4 and still has to play at Miami and Duke but get Pitt and NC State at home. I guess you can call that a decent shot at two wins. They ain't gonna beat Miami and Duke and NC State is a rival game. The State game could come down to one of those teams becoming bowl eligible.

SC is 4-4 but they have a very soft schedule the rest of the way so they will definitely go to a bowl game.

As far as the AAC's worst teams, I don't think Houston is one of the AAC's worst teams and we can't help that Tulsa and SMU has stunk it up.

I guess you missed my previous statement about before and after O'Korn was benched. He was horrible this year.

(10-27-2014 03:01 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  They represent the AAC and they got their asses kicked. Stop making excuses for losing three games to CUSA because deep down inside, it makes you sick that CUSA won those games.

To be honest with you, I really don't give 2 ***** what the rest of the AAC does as long as we've got a couple of decent conference games on the schedule. ECU doesn't have problems getting P5's to play us. If you guys honestly think that wins vs UNC and VT are the same as wins vs Little Miami and Ohio... more power to you.

Doesn't matter about O'Korn. Point is CUSA couldn't help preseason favorite UH along with Tulsa and SMU sucked when the games were played. You guys had them penciled as wins before the season started.

Just like ECU can't help those P-5 wins aren't looking as impressive as they look at when they were played. So if you really don't give two ***** you're certainly isn't posting like it.

(10-27-2014 02:55 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:47 PM)ESE84 Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:41 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  CUSA has 3 wins vs the AAC's worst teams. Congratulations?

Houston one of your worst teams? Really?

That would be news to Memphis and Temple.

Before swapping out O'Korn at QB, yes they were.

So many asterisks next to the AAC arguments!

Only one team standing undefeated.

I find it funny they (some ECU and AAC posters) get so defensive about stuff. I'm pretty certain everyone here is in agreement that ECU definitely had the better schedule than Marshall from a perception perspective. If the AAC'ers and ECU people just stick to the facts with their arguments instead of using so many asterisks they wouldn't get shot down so much.

They've used the Sagarin ranking = failed
They've used the RPI ranking = failed
They've used Power rankings = failed
Head to head = asterisks

The only they got is that CUSA has no P-5 wins. Congrats AAC, you've won an argument.

(10-27-2014 04:43 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  I find it funny they (some ECU and AAC posters) get so defensive about stuff. I'm pretty certain everyone here is in agreement that ECU definitely had the better schedule than Marshall from a perception perspective. If the AAC'ers and ECU people just stick to the facts with their arguments instead of using so many asterisks they wouldn't get shot down so much.

They've used the Sagarin ranking = failed
They've used the RPI ranking = failed
They've used Power rankings = failed
Head to head = asterisks

The only they got is that CUSA has no P-5 wins. Congrats AAC, you've won an argument.

350 lb qb.

snicker

(10-27-2014 04:43 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  I find it funny they (some ECU and AAC posters) get so defensive about stuff. I'm pretty certain everyone here is in agreement that ECU definitely had the better out of conference schedule than Marshall from a perception perspective.

Fixed it for you.

I will not believe for a second that the ECU in conference schedule (which includes UConn, Tulsa, SMU and Tulane) is better than the Marshall in conference schedule (which will include a championship game against the West divisional winner).

(10-27-2014 05:16 PM)ESE84 Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 04:43 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  I find it funny they (some ECU and AAC posters) get so defensive about stuff. I'm pretty certain everyone here is in agreement that ECU definitely had the better out of conference schedule than Marshall from a perception perspective.

Fixed it for you.

I will not believe for a second that the ECU in conference schedule (which includes UConn, Tulsa, SMU and Tulane) is better than the Marshall in conference schedule (which will include a championship game against the West divisional winner).

I agree. Now can we report sherie khan for trolling?

(10-27-2014 03:53 PM)ESE84 Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:55 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:47 PM)ESE84 Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 02:41 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  CUSA has 3 wins vs the AAC's worst teams. Congratulations?

Houston one of your worst teams? Really?

That would be news to Memphis and Temple.

Before swapping out O'Korn at QB, yes they were.

So many asterisks next to the AAC arguments!

Only one team standing undefeated.

Yup, and it ain't Rice.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(10-27-2014 05:43 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  Yup, and it ain't Rice.

Well, this is about as relevant to the discussion as the rest of your arguments here. Thanks for stopping by to say hello.