Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
AAC by the numbers
Author Message
Insane_Baboon Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,669
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 52
I Root For: VT & UCF
Location:
Post: #1
AAC by the numbers
I just thought it would be interesting to look at stats at roughly the halfway point.

Total Offense (YPG)
1. ECU 564
2. UC 443
3. Tulsa 433
4. Memphis 429
5. Houston 381
6. Temple 370
7. Tulane 354
8. USF 311
9. UCF 289
10. UConn 256
11. SMU 248

Total Defense (YPG)
1. UConn 325
2. UCF 326
3. Houston 327
4. Temple 345
5. Memphis 357
6. ECU 363
7. Tulane 367
8. USF 418
9. Tulsa 494
10. UC 524
11. SMU 548

Penalties (YPG)
1. UC 46
2. UConn 48
3. SMU 52
4. Temple 54
5. USF 55
6. UCF 63
7. Tulsa 66
8. Memphis 69
9. Houston 71
10. Tulane 83
11. ECU 83

Leading Receivers (YPG)
1. Keevan Lucas (Tulsa) 115
2. Justin Hardy (ECU) 98
3. Isiah Jones (ECU) 79
4. Geremy Davis (UConn) 71
5. Chris Moore (UC) 70

Leading Rushers (YPG)
1. Marlon Mack (USF) 103
2. Breon Allen (ECU) 84
3. Sherman Badie (Tulane) 83
4. Zack Langer (Tulsa) 72
5. Kenneth Farrow (Houston) 62

Interceptions (Int/G)
1. Jacoby Glenn (UCF) 0.67
1. Josh Hawkins (ECU) 0.67
3. Tavon Young (Temple) 0.5
3. Bobby McCain (Memphis) 0.5
5. Brandon Alexander (UCF) 0.33
5. Fritz Etienne (Memphis) 0.33

Note that I typed these on my phone so there could be typos.
10-23-2014 08:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


sfink16 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,571
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 73
I Root For: Temple
Location: Dubois, Pa
Post: #2
RE: AAC by the numbers
I always hated viewing selective stats, especially the most overrated YPG stats. Is YPG important? Yes, but it hardly tells the story.

For example, the "Bend, don't break defenses" YPG is one of the more insignificant stat for that particular defense. Red zone defense (keeping 'em out of the end zone) is the most important, followed by turnovers created. It is this defense that is designed to not give up the big play forcing teams to drive the length of the field, waiting for the opposing offense to commit a big penalty or make a big mistake.

It requires patience on the opponents offense but does have the downside of potentially tiring the defense but keeping them on the field too long.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2014 09:07 AM by sfink16.)
10-23-2014 08:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskyU Offline
Big East Overlord
*

Posts: 22,802
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1182
I Root For: UCONN
Location: The Big East
Post: #3
RE: AAC by the numbers
Cincinnati offense and UCONN defense would be a Top 25-caliber team.

Go Bearskies!!!
10-23-2014 09:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Insane_Baboon Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,669
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 52
I Root For: VT & UCF
Location:
Post: #4
Re: RE: AAC by the numbers
(10-23-2014 08:56 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  
(10-23-2014 08:30 AM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  I just thought it would be interesting to look at stats at roughly the halfway point.

Total Offense (YPG)
1. ECU 564
2. UC 443
3. Tulsa 433
4. Memphis 429
5. Houston 381
6. Temple 370
7. Tulane 354
8. USF 311
9. UCF 289
10. UConn 256
11. SMU 248

Total Defense (YPG)
1. UConn 325
2. UCF 326
3. Houston 327
4. Temple 345
5. Memphis 357
6. ECU 363
7. Tulane 367
8. USF 418
9. Tulsa 494
10. UC 524
11. SMU 548

Penalties (YPG)
1. UC 46
2. UConn 48
3. SMU 52
4. Temple 54
5. USF 55
6. UCF 63
7. Tulsa 66
8. Memphis 69
9. Houston 71
10. Tulane 83
11. ECU 83

Leading Receivers (YPG)
1. Keevan Lucas (Tulsa) 115
2. Justin Hardy (ECU) 98
3. Isiah Jones (ECU) 79
4. Geremy Davis (UConn) 71
5. Chris Moore (UC) 70

Leading Rushers (YPG)
1. Marlon Mack (USF) 103
2. Breon Allen (ECU) 84
3. Sherman Badie (Tulane) 83
4. Zack Langer (Tulsa) 72
5. Kenneth Farrow (Houston) 62

Interceptions (Int/G)
1. Jacoby Glenn (UCF) 0.67
1. Josh Hawkins (ECU) 0.67
3. Tavon Young (Temple) 0.5
3. Bobby McCain (Memphis) 0.5
5. Brandon Alexander (UCF) 0.33
5. Fritz Etienne (Memphis) 0.33

Note that I typed these on my phone so there could be typos.

I always hated viewing selective stats, especially the most overrated YPG stats. Is YPG important? Yes, but it hardly tells the story.

For example, the "Bend, don't break defenses" YPG is one of the more insignificant stat for that particular defense. Red zone defense (keeping 'em out of the end zone) is the most important, followed by turnovers created. It is this defense that is designed to not give up the big play forcing teams to drive the length of the field, waiting for the opposing offense to commit a big penalty or make a big mistake.

It requires patience on the opponents offense but does have the downside of potentially tiring the defense but keeping them on the field too long.

Scoring Defense (PPG)
1. Temple 17.2
2. Houston 17.9
3. UCF 20.0
4. Memphis 20.8
5. ECU 23.8
6. UConn 25.7
7. Tulane 28.1
8. USF 29.0
9. UC 34.5
10. Tulsa 40.7
11. SMU 48.0

This is the stat you want, then.
10-23-2014 09:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Insane_Baboon Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,669
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 52
I Root For: VT & UCF
Location:
Post: #5
Re: RE: AAC by the numbers
(10-23-2014 09:07 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  Cincinnati offense and UCONN defense would be a Top 25-caliber team.

Go Bearskies!!!
I could root for some Bearskies!
10-23-2014 09:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ElectricCoogaloo Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 769
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Houston
Location: The Dance Floor
Post: #6
RE: AAC by the numbers
Seeing UH basically absent from the passing and offensive categories makes my heart hurt.
10-23-2014 09:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BullsFanInTX Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,485
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 338
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #7
RE: AAC by the numbers
(10-23-2014 08:30 AM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  Leading Receivers (YPG)
1. Keevan Lucas (Tulsa) 115
2. Justin Hardy (ECU) 98
3. Isiah Jones (ECU) 79
4. Geremy Davis (UConn) 71
5. Chris Moore (UC) 70

Without looking up his stats, I feel confident that Andre Davis is at the top of this list in yards per game, however he's only played 3-4 games due to injury.

Edit: I just looked up Davis' stats and he has 322 yards receiving though 3 games (really 2.5), so that comes out to about 107 per game.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2014 09:32 AM by BullsFanInTX.)
10-23-2014 09:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


coogrfan Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,969
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 157
I Root For: Houston
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #8
RE: AAC by the numbers
(10-23-2014 09:28 AM)ElectricCoogaloo Wrote:  Seeing UH basically absent from the passing and offensive categories makes my heart hurt.

Bushwacked.
10-23-2014 10:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
sfink16 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,571
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 73
I Root For: Temple
Location: Dubois, Pa
Post: #9
RE: AAC by the numbers
(10-23-2014 09:10 AM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  
(10-23-2014 08:56 AM)sfink16 Wrote:  I always hated viewing selective stats, especially the most overrated YPG stats. Is YPG important? Yes, but it hardly tells the story.

For example, the "Bend, don't break defenses" YPG is one of the more insignificant stat for that particular defense. Red zone defense (keeping 'em out of the end zone) is the most important, followed by turnovers created. It is this defense that is designed to not give up the big play forcing teams to drive the length of the field, waiting for the opposing offense to commit a big penalty or make a big mistake.

It requires patience on the opponents offense but does have the downside of potentially tiring the defense but keeping them on the field too long.

Scoring Defense (PPG)
1. Temple 17.2
2. Houston 17.9
3. UCF 20.0
4. Memphis 20.8
5. ECU 23.8
6. UConn 25.7
7. Tulane 28.1
8. USF 29.0
9. UC 34.5
10. Tulsa 40.7
11. SMU 48.0

This is the stat you want, then.

It's a more meaningful stat, true, but even it can be misleading to some extent.

Some depends on time of possession of the offense. Special teams plays an obvious role that people forget to talk about. Are the Special Teams producing or giving up points? Some teams, VT comes to mind, traditionally use Special teams to their advantage. Is the QB inept and throwing pick sixes or giving up great field position for the opponent?

Team stats are just that team stats. Looking deeply into them tells the complete story. Anything short, not necessarily so.
10-23-2014 11:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


JHG722 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,917
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 219
I Root For: Temple
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Post: #10
RE: AAC by the numbers
Jalen Fitzpatrick just behind Chris Moore @ 69.5 ReYPG
10-23-2014 09:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AirRaid Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,292
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 51
I Root For: H-TownTakeover
Location:
Post: #11
RE: AAC by the numbers
(10-23-2014 09:28 AM)ElectricCoogaloo Wrote:  Seeing UH basically absent from the passing and offensive categories makes my heart hurt.

I prefer no Bush.
10-23-2014 09:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NothingButKnight Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,341
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 106
I Root For: UCF, LSU
Location: New Orleans, LA
Post: #12
RE: AAC by the numbers
(10-23-2014 08:30 AM)Insane_Baboon Wrote:  Total Offense (YPG)
9. UCF 289

Total Defense (YPG)
2. UCF 326

Interceptions (Int/G)
1. Jacoby Glenn (UCF) 0.67
5. Brandon Alexander (UCF) 0.33

Classic UCF.
10-23-2014 09:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.