Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Great Graph on TV Contracts
Author Message
msm96wolf Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,558
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 180
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #1
Great Graph on TV Contracts
[Image: Infograph1.jpg]
10-15-2014 01:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


HuskyU Offline
Big East Overlord
*

Posts: 22,802
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1182
I Root For: UCONN
Location: The Big East
Post: #2
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
Well, at least we (the AAC) made the graphic...can't say the same about the rest of the G5...
10-15-2014 02:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Indiana Bones Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,326
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 94
I Root For: ECU
Location: Greenville, NC
Post: #3
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
I figured it would look something like that but it's still depressing. Ideally, it would be more fair if each individual team could negotiate their own individual television contract regardless of conference affiliation based off of that particular team's idiosyncratic merit and appeal. Then the Wake Forests of the world couldn't siphon off the success of the FSUs of the world.
10-15-2014 02:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,874
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 895
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #4
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 02:24 PM)Indiana Bones Wrote:  I figured it would look something like that but it's still depressing. Ideally, it would be more fair if each individual team could negotiate their own individual television contract regardless of conference affiliation based off of that particular team's idiosyncratic merit and appeal. Then the Wake Forests of the world couldn't siphon off the success of the FSUs of the world.

ND agrees with you.
10-15-2014 02:27 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,850
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 179
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #5
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 02:19 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Well, at least we (the AAC) made the graphic...can't say the same about the rest of the G5...

Probably because the American was a BCS conference when the data was graphed?
10-15-2014 02:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskyU Offline
Big East Overlord
*

Posts: 22,802
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1182
I Root For: UCONN
Location: The Big East
Post: #6
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 02:43 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  
(10-15-2014 02:19 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Well, at least we (the AAC) made the graphic...can't say the same about the rest of the G5...

Probably because the American was a BCS conference when the data was graphed?

Probably just because they love us more.
10-15-2014 02:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FrancisDrake Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,648
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 66
I Root For: Piecesof8
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
If it remains intact as is I imagine the AAC will bump to about a third of the Entitled 5's numbers.
10-15-2014 02:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ken d Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,330
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1211
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #8
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
When you adjust those numbers to show how much that is per school, the Big 12 is right there with the ACC and B1G. The PAC has the strongest deal, meaning they have little pressure to expand. And the SEC will be renegotiated very soon which will no doubt put them right up there with the rest of the P5.

The surprising thing (or maybe not) is that the P5 are all fairly close, and the gulf between them and the G5 is cosmic.
10-15-2014 03:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dbackjon Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,007
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 655
I Root For: NAU/Illini
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 02:56 PM)FrancisDrake Wrote:  If it remains intact as is I imagine the AAC will bump to about a third of the Entitled 5's numbers.


What would lead you to believe that?
10-15-2014 03:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Online
Legend
*

Posts: 50,011
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2370
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #10
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 02:56 PM)FrancisDrake Wrote:  If it remains intact as is I imagine the AAC will bump to about a third of the Entitled 5's numbers.

That would mean a quadrupling of revenue, to around $8 million per school, per year. I see no basis for that whatsoever.
10-15-2014 04:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


goofus Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,285
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 148
I Root For: Iowa
Location: chicago suburbs
Post: #11
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 03:23 PM)ken d Wrote:  When you adjust those numbers to show how much that is per school, the Big 12 is right there with the ACC and B1G. The PAC has the strongest deal, meaning they have little pressure to expand. And the SEC will be renegotiated very soon which will no doubt put them right up there with the rest of the P5.

The surprising thing (or maybe not) is that the P5 are all fairly close, and the gulf between them and the G5 is cosmic.

Thats the main problem with that graphic. Is that the revenue per year? Its not clear. We need a graphic that compares revenue per year per school. Then it would make sense. I have no idea what this graphic is comparing exactly
10-15-2014 04:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
westwolf Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 825
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 8
I Root For: CFB
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 02:56 PM)FrancisDrake Wrote:  If it remains intact as is I imagine the AAC will bump to about a third of the Entitled 5's numbers.

Based on their stellar FB performance?
10-15-2014 04:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kittonhead Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: Beat Matisse
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 04:16 PM)goofus Wrote:  
(10-15-2014 03:23 PM)ken d Wrote:  When you adjust those numbers to show how much that is per school, the Big 12 is right there with the ACC and B1G. The PAC has the strongest deal, meaning they have little pressure to expand. And the SEC will be renegotiated very soon which will no doubt put them right up there with the rest of the P5.

The surprising thing (or maybe not) is that the P5 are all fairly close, and the gulf between them and the G5 is cosmic.

Thats the main problem with that graphic. Is that the revenue per year? Its not clear. We need a graphic that compares revenue per year per school. Then it would make sense. I have no idea what this graphic is comparing exactly

It looks like conference revenue per year on average through the length of the deal.

Again I go back to the al la carte regional packages to see where the B12 is going to have an issue.

B1G-MAC
SEC-CUSA
PAC-MWC
ACC-AAC

The B12 is in a region without a G5 dance partner. Yes Rice, Houston and Tulsa are in the B12's region but the AAC is more so ACC country.
10-15-2014 09:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,478
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 766
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #14
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
Any graph like this that doesn't account for number of schools in the conference is so fundamentally flawed that I can't go any further.
10-17-2014 11:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ESE84 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,596
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 205
I Root For: Rice then UH
Location: Houston

New Orleans BowlDonators
Post: #15
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-15-2014 04:04 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(10-15-2014 02:56 PM)FrancisDrake Wrote:  If it remains intact as is I imagine the AAC will bump to about a third of the Entitled 5's numbers.

That would mean a quadrupling of revenue, to around $8 million per school, per year. I see no basis for that whatsoever.

See Southwest Conference. See WAC-16. See C-USA 2.0. This is a conference contract. The AAC might have some programs at the top that would command that kind of money, but no way are Tulsa, Tulane, SMU football and UConn football part of that high dollar club.

I doubt the AAC remains intact over the long haul.
10-17-2014 04:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskyU Offline
Big East Overlord
*

Posts: 22,802
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1182
I Root For: UCONN
Location: The Big East
Post: #16
RE: Great Graph on TV Contracts
(10-17-2014 04:49 PM)ESE84 Wrote:  
(10-15-2014 04:04 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(10-15-2014 02:56 PM)FrancisDrake Wrote:  If it remains intact as is I imagine the AAC will bump to about a third of the Entitled 5's numbers.

That would mean a quadrupling of revenue, to around $8 million per school, per year. I see no basis for that whatsoever.

See Southwest Conference. See WAC-16. See C-USA 2.0. This is a conference contract. The AAC might have some programs at the top that would command that kind of money, but no way are Tulsa, Tulane, SMU football and UConn football part of that high dollar club.

I doubt the AAC remains intact over the long haul.

UCONN is tier one in the AAC contract and will continue to be regardless of the product on the football field. 07-coffee3
10-17-2014 05:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.