Author doesn't really answer the question presented in the headline, but I think his idea was to let the readers decide... IMO, from what I've seen, SMU is a complete mess. Should be able to compete from a talent standpoint, but nobody looks comfortable out there, and I know a lot of it has to do w/ injuries as well, but that's a testament to the lack of depth as well. Worst team? I'd throw them up there with Miami (Oh.), UMass and Idaho...

http://aacfootballfever.com/are-smu-must...am-in-fbs/

On one hand, they are statistically the worst team in the country by a wide margin.

On the other hand, has anybody played a tougher schedule so far?

I would guess they are a mess, but not as bad as they appear to be.

(10-02-2014 07:58 AM)Chappy Wrote:  On one hand, they are statistically the worst team in the country by a wide margin.

On the other hand, has anybody played a tougher schedule so far?

I would guess they are a mess, but not as bad as they appear to be.

Terrifying schedule, yes, but not once did they show life in any of those games, and North Texas just isn't a team you lose 43-6 to.