Fitbud
Banned
Posts: 30,983
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
|
Re: RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-01-2014 08:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote: (10-01-2014 07:56 PM)Fitbud Wrote: It's hard not to notice that some conservatives on this forum are upset with the changes. It's very telling IMHO however.
Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
Jesus, you guys are unreal...
Bud, this is obviously directed at certain posters. You need to stop. ALl this does is encourage someone on the rght to call you out in response. You're not talking about a generic conservative... you're talking about posters specifically in this thread.
If that is the sort of forum you guys want, go to the wild west.
Seriously...
Seriously? I was going to just say conservatives but was afraid I would get accused of painting everyone with a broad brush. I hope there is a grace period, this could take some getting used to.
Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
|
|
10-01-2014 09:03 PM |
|
oklalittledixie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17,554
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 129
I Root For: Oklahoma
Location: Oklahoma City
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote: Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."
That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.
oh no, stop, please don't.
I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.
You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?
Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.
|
|
10-02-2014 08:39 AM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 08:39 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: (10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote: Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."
That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.
oh no, stop, please don't.
I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.
You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?
Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.
Come on dixie, stop turning this into a gripe thread.
|
|
10-02-2014 08:51 AM |
|
oklalittledixie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17,554
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 129
I Root For: Oklahoma
Location: Oklahoma City
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 08:51 AM)john01992 Wrote: (10-02-2014 08:39 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: (10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote: Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."
That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.
oh no, stop, please don't.
I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.
You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?
Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.
Come on dixie, stop turning this into a gripe thread.
Hey, I just answered a question. No one ask him and no one asked you to chime in. I am not mad and I am not griping. I am simply explaining what the problem is.
|
|
10-02-2014 09:01 AM |
|
G-Man
Heisman
Posts: 8,380
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 481
I Root For: Truth & Justice
Location: Cyberspace
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 08:51 AM)john01992 Wrote: (10-02-2014 08:39 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: (10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote: Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."
That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.
oh no, stop, please don't.
I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.
You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?
Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.
Come on dixie, stop turning this into a gripe thread.
Perfect example of how a thread becomes a gripe thread-- NOT his comment, but YOURS.
|
|
10-02-2014 09:17 AM |
|
Lord Stanley
L'Étoile du Nord
Posts: 19,103
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 994
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
Anyone Who Ever Writes This Wrote:You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.
This is not how posting on this message board works.
If someone posts a comment, anyone else can chime in and remark on that comment without worrying about if it was their "business" or not..... Everything posted to the thread is fair game to be quoted or replied.
If it was indeed no one else's business and the public's input was not desired, (which in many cases is completely legitimate) then it should be handled via PM.
|
|
10-02-2014 09:32 AM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,769
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-01-2014 08:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote: (10-01-2014 07:56 PM)Fitbud Wrote: It's hard not to notice that some conservatives on this forum are upset with the changes. It's very telling IMHO however.
Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
Jesus, you guys are unreal...
Bud, this is obviously directed at certain posters. You need to stop. ALl this does is encourage someone on the rght to call you out in response. You're not talking about a generic conservative... you're talking about posters specifically in this thread.
If that is the sort of forum you guys want, go to the wild west.
Seriously...
Please...please...please don't lump 'us' all in with Fitbud. Thanks.
|
|
10-02-2014 10:22 AM |
|
Fitbud
Banned
Posts: 30,983
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (10-01-2014 08:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote: (10-01-2014 07:56 PM)Fitbud Wrote: It's hard not to notice that some conservatives on this forum are upset with the changes. It's very telling IMHO however.
Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
Jesus, you guys are unreal...
Bud, this is obviously directed at certain posters. You need to stop. ALl this does is encourage someone on the rght to call you out in response. You're not talking about a generic conservative... you're talking about posters specifically in this thread.
If that is the sort of forum you guys want, go to the wild west.
Seriously...
Please...please...please don't lump 'us' all in with Fitbud. Thanks.
So now I'm the bad guy? Really?
Okay say hello to the bad guy.
|
|
10-02-2014 12:18 PM |
|
BleedsHuskieRed
All American
Posts: 10,067
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 78
I Root For: NIU
Location: Colorado Springs
|
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
This thread has served is purpose. If you have questions about moderation in this forum, please PM a moderator or GTS.
|
|
10-02-2014 12:22 PM |
|