Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
Author Message
Fitbud Offline
Banned

Posts: 30,983
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
Post: #41
Re: RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-01-2014 08:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  
(10-01-2014 07:56 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  It's hard not to notice that some conservatives on this forum are upset with the changes. It's very telling IMHO however.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Jesus, you guys are unreal...

Bud, this is obviously directed at certain posters. You need to stop. ALl this does is encourage someone on the rght to call you out in response. You're not talking about a generic conservative... you're talking about posters specifically in this thread.

If that is the sort of forum you guys want, go to the wild west.

Seriously...

Seriously? I was going to just say conservatives but was afraid I would get accused of painting everyone with a broad brush. I hope there is a grace period, this could take some getting used to.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
10-01-2014 09:03 PM
Find all posts by this user
oklalittledixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,554
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 129
I Root For: Oklahoma
Location: Oklahoma City
Post: #42
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."

That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.

oh no, stop, please don't.

I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.


You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?

Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.
(This post was last modified: 10-02-2014 08:48 AM by oklalittledixie.)
10-02-2014 08:39 AM
Find all posts by this user
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #43
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 08:39 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."

That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.

oh no, stop, please don't.

I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.


You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?

Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.

Come on dixie, stop turning this into a gripe thread.
10-02-2014 08:51 AM
Find all posts by this user
oklalittledixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,554
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 129
I Root For: Oklahoma
Location: Oklahoma City
Post: #44
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 08:51 AM)john01992 Wrote:  
(10-02-2014 08:39 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."

That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.

oh no, stop, please don't.

I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.


You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?

Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.

Come on dixie, stop turning this into a gripe thread.

Hey, I just answered a question. No one ask him and no one asked you to chime in. I am not mad and I am not griping. I am simply explaining what the problem is.
10-02-2014 09:01 AM
Find all posts by this user
G-Man Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,380
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 481
I Root For: Truth & Justice
Location: Cyberspace
Post: #45
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 08:51 AM)john01992 Wrote:  
(10-02-2014 08:39 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(10-01-2014 08:58 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  
Quote:Set word bans, and if that still isn't enough for the thin skinned, make them a little sub room with multiple baby sitters so they can be delicate and "progressive."

That's why conservatives are upset. That's my rant, I love ya anyway, I'm going back to the sub room above us.

oh no, stop, please don't.

I mean for christs sake, have they altered or deleted a single one of your posts? No. Has there been any political discourse hindered? No. Then, quantitatively, what the hell has changed? You're acting like you so desperately want to be some victim of the big bad liberal agenda that you're literally self-censoring yourself and blaming these mods for doing so. How's about you give them a chance to see if they can't tiptoe the line well, instead of making all these self-serving and utterly unconvincing pleas of censorship.


You mean the victims of threads they didn't want to see on their screens?

Please dude. You have no idea. You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.

Come on dixie, stop turning this into a gripe thread.

Perfect example of how a thread becomes a gripe thread-- NOT his comment, but YOURS.
10-02-2014 09:17 AM
Find all posts by this user
Lord Stanley Offline
L'Étoile du Nord
*

Posts: 19,103
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 994
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
Post: #46
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
Anyone Who Ever Writes This Wrote:You also need to learn when to mind your own business. I obviously was responding to someone else and no one asked you for your input.

This is not how posting on this message board works.

If someone posts a comment, anyone else can chime in and remark on that comment without worrying about if it was their "business" or not..... Everything posted to the thread is fair game to be quoted or replied.

If it was indeed no one else's business and the public's input was not desired, (which in many cases is completely legitimate) then it should be handled via PM.
10-02-2014 09:32 AM
Find all posts by this user
Redwingtom Online
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,769
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #47
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-01-2014 08:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  
(10-01-2014 07:56 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  It's hard not to notice that some conservatives on this forum are upset with the changes. It's very telling IMHO however.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Jesus, you guys are unreal...

Bud, this is obviously directed at certain posters. You need to stop. ALl this does is encourage someone on the rght to call you out in response. You're not talking about a generic conservative... you're talking about posters specifically in this thread.

If that is the sort of forum you guys want, go to the wild west.

Seriously...

Please...please...please don't lump 'us' all in with Fitbud. Thanks. 03-wink
10-02-2014 10:22 AM
Find all posts by this user
Fitbud Offline
Banned

Posts: 30,983
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
Post: #48
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
(10-02-2014 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(10-01-2014 08:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  
(10-01-2014 07:56 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  It's hard not to notice that some conservatives on this forum are upset with the changes. It's very telling IMHO however.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Jesus, you guys are unreal...

Bud, this is obviously directed at certain posters. You need to stop. ALl this does is encourage someone on the rght to call you out in response. You're not talking about a generic conservative... you're talking about posters specifically in this thread.

If that is the sort of forum you guys want, go to the wild west.

Seriously...

Please...please...please don't lump 'us' all in with Fitbud. Thanks. 03-wink

So now I'm the bad guy? Really?

Okay say hello to the bad guy.
10-02-2014 12:18 PM
Find all posts by this user
BleedsHuskieRed Offline
All American
*

Posts: 10,067
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 78
I Root For: NIU
Location: Colorado Springs

Donators
Post: #49
RE: Regarding Rule #1 - Question for the Moderators
This thread has served is purpose. If you have questions about moderation in this forum, please PM a moderator or GTS.
10-02-2014 12:22 PM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.