http://freebeacon.com/politics/the-hillary-letters/

Quote:Clinton’s connection to Alinsky has been the subject of speculation for decades. It became controversial when Wellsley College, by request of the Clinton White House, sealed her 1968 thesis from the public for years. ............. Clinton opponent turned Clinton defender David Brock referred to her as “Alinsky’s daughter” in 1996′s.

Commie.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Look, they could have her and Obama simultaneously whacking the man's pud while chanting " I'm a commie, I'm a commie" and it still wouldn't matter.

The commie/socialists/leftists aren't really even trying to hide their beliefs anymore. Case and point, look at the commie climate marches yesterday. These people will not rest until they literally transform our country into a leftist utopia.

Was She a Clinton then ? Another '60's Radical amongst the ones wanting to take over America from within that was the Motto of the day in early 1970's from the Columbia and Berkley Student Radicals.

(09-22-2014 09:03 PM)maximus Wrote:  Look, they could have her and Obama simultaneously whacking the man's pud while chanting " I'm a commie, I'm a commie" and it still wouldn't matter.

The commie/socialists/leftists aren't really even trying to hide their beliefs anymore. Case and point, look at the commie climate marches yesterday. These people will not rest until they literally transform our country into a leftist utopia.

They scurried out into the light and no one sprayed them down so now they are in the open exactly as you say. Effing cockroaches.

She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

(09-23-2014 07:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

Svck enough d!cks and your face caves in.

(09-23-2014 07:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

I just threw up!!


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(09-23-2014 07:57 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 07:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

I just threw up!!


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Lol, I said almost.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

(09-23-2014 07:29 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 07:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

Svck enough d!cks and your face caves in.

ha!


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

(09-23-2014 07:29 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 07:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

Svck enough d!cks and your face caves in.

That's not her thing.

(09-23-2014 08:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 07:29 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 07:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

Svck enough d!cks and your face caves in.

That's not her thing.

He needed context for the dick sucking

Curious...did I just fall into a time warp back to 2007?

(09-24-2014 04:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious...did I just fall into a time warp back to 2007?

and you'll vote for her because the Rules for Radicals work on you.

(09-24-2014 04:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious...did I just fall into a time warp back to 2007?

See post 3

How do you do it?

stay attached to the ball sack of two people at once that is

(09-23-2014 07:12 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  She was almost attractive in that pic, what happened???

Whoooooaaaaaa, Ophthalmologist for TigerBlue, STAT!

(09-24-2014 04:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-24-2014 04:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious...did I just fall into a time warp back to 2007?

and you'll vote for her because the Rules for Radicals work on you.

Have you even read those rules? You might find them interesting, since you seem to regularly practice a couple of them.

Not to mention, they're not really all that controversial.

Quote:* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

(09-24-2014 05:36 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-24-2014 04:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious...did I just fall into a time warp back to 2007?

See post 3

How do you do it?

stay attached to the ball sack of two people at once that is

What in the hell are you babbling about...and why the continual need to revert everything back to genitalia?

Tom will vote for Hillary.

(09-25-2014 09:08 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not to mention, they're not really all that controversial.

That comment speaks volumes.