(09-20-2014 01:44 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 12:07 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 11:26 AM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 11:13 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 11:09 AM)Lush Wrote:  i'm not against government i just don't understand why you care so deeply for these victims. is it because they probably won't be voting gop or at all if they're so strung out?

exactly, warrior. Meth labs effect no one else but the people operating them and those using the product.

If we just had government operated meth labs in special facilities and special parks for meth users to use the product, we could tax it and pay off the national debt.

Your logic is not known by many men.

nah, they don't have to government operated. you or i could run a meth lab! we'd just have to meet some safety protocols. gah! more government intrusion! but i also would like some of the proceeds from said meth use to go to treatment centers if that sh!t actually works

nah, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and really do an injustice to the legalize everything crowd.

Get back to your video games, digital warrior.

i've never owned a television, non digital straight edger. clearly i'm trying to usurp some agenda within the inner workings of the legalize crowd. i just don't give a f*ck what people do with their lives. however it manifests itself is fine by me. i shouldn't have to offer more caveats at this point. your problem is that you don't like being free. you need protection from a nanny state. cannot your guns and religion afford you assurance of a better tomorrow, in this life or the next?*

*the obama pun was unintentional and i in no way have a problem with someone owning weapons nor practicing a particular religion. merely stating that, shouldn't those items (if you will), be enough insurance to safeguard your being? i think you misinterpret my beliefs. i am no anarchist. i believe that the world works best when society reigns. you aren't going to rid the world of whatever you perceive as ill. your efforts are in vain. accept what already is and learn to cope with it. turning somebody into a criminal because of their habit of choice makes anyone who drinks alcohol a hypocrite. take a stance on alcohol and i'll be your audience. but you won't. you're a smart guy, and i've enjoyed this

Now it's just ramblings of a madman, somewhere out there.

(09-20-2014 01:46 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 01:44 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 12:07 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 11:26 AM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 11:13 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  exactly, warrior. Meth labs effect no one else but the people operating them and those using the product.

If we just had government operated meth labs in special facilities and special parks for meth users to use the product, we could tax it and pay off the national debt.

Your logic is not known by many men.

nah, they don't have to government operated. you or i could run a meth lab! we'd just have to meet some safety protocols. gah! more government intrusion! but i also would like some of the proceeds from said meth use to go to treatment centers if that sh!t actually works

nah, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and really do an injustice to the legalize everything crowd.

Get back to your video games, digital warrior.

i've never owned a television, non digital straight edger. clearly i'm trying to usurp some agenda within the inner workings of the legalize crowd. i just don't give a f*ck what people do with their lives. however it manifests itself is fine by me. i shouldn't have to offer more caveats at this point. your problem is that you don't like being free. you need protection from a nanny state. cannot your guns and religion afford you assurance of a better tomorrow, in this life or the next?*

*the obama pun was unintentional and i in no way have a problem with someone owning weapons nor practicing a particular religion. merely stating that, shouldn't those items (if you will), be enough insurance to safeguard your being? i think you misinterpret my beliefs. i am no anarchist. i believe that the world works best when society reigns. you aren't going to rid the world of whatever you perceive as ill. your efforts are in vain. accept what already is and learn to cope with it. turning somebody into a criminal because of their habit of choice makes anyone who drinks alcohol a hypocrite. take a stance on alcohol and i'll be your audience. but you won't. you're a smart guy, and i've enjoyed this

Now it's just ramblings of a madman, somewhere out there.

it would do the world justice if we all went mad on occasion

Wow if that meth lab were next door to some of you idiots I wonder how quick you'd be looking for a swat team to shut them down. For fvcks sake people.

(09-20-2014 01:46 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 01:44 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 12:07 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 11:26 AM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 11:13 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  exactly, warrior. Meth labs effect no one else but the people operating them and those using the product.

If we just had government operated meth labs in special facilities and special parks for meth users to use the product, we could tax it and pay off the national debt.

Your logic is not known by many men.

nah, they don't have to government operated. you or i could run a meth lab! we'd just have to meet some safety protocols. gah! more government intrusion! but i also would like some of the proceeds from said meth use to go to treatment centers if that sh!t actually works

nah, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and really do an injustice to the legalize everything crowd.

Get back to your video games, digital warrior.

i've never owned a television, non digital straight edger. clearly i'm trying to usurp some agenda within the inner workings of the legalize crowd. i just don't give a f*ck what people do with their lives. however it manifests itself is fine by me. i shouldn't have to offer more caveats at this point. your problem is that you don't like being free. you need protection from a nanny state. cannot your guns and religion afford you assurance of a better tomorrow, in this life or the next?*

*the obama pun was unintentional and i in no way have a problem with someone owning weapons nor practicing a particular religion. merely stating that, shouldn't those items (if you will), be enough insurance to safeguard your being? i think you misinterpret my beliefs. i am no anarchist. i believe that the world works best when society reigns. you aren't going to rid the world of whatever you perceive as ill. your efforts are in vain. accept what already is and learn to cope with it. turning somebody into a criminal because of their habit of choice makes anyone who drinks alcohol a hypocrite. take a stance on alcohol and i'll be your audience. but you won't. you're a smart guy, and i've enjoyed this

Now it's just ramblings of a madman, somewhere out there.

it would do the world finally justice if we all had predilection for madness

(09-20-2014 02:14 PM)bevotex Wrote:  Wow if that meth lab were next door to some of you idiots I wonder how quick you'd be looking for a swat team to shut them down. For fvcks sake people.

Most likely sheltered kids that live in the burbs.

(09-20-2014 10:01 AM)Lush Wrote:  i grant you the meth houses blowing up is bad but if all the incentive out of manufacturing it were taken away so too would that. i know that's all conjecture, but if say you, for example, were in want of meth but your guy lived across town but sold it on the cheap or you could walk to your 7-11. but this is probably pointless to discuss with you, right?

There is little chance that you would take the incentive of making meth away because it is already cheaper to produce illicitly than it would be legally.

(09-20-2014 02:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 10:01 AM)Lush Wrote:  i grant you the meth houses blowing up is bad but if all the incentive out of manufacturing it were taken away so too would that. i know that's all conjecture, but if say you, for example, were in want of meth but your guy lived across town but sold it on the cheap or you could walk to your 7-11. but this is probably pointless to discuss with you, right?

There is little chance that you would take the incentive of making meth away because it is already cheaper to produce illicitly than it would be legally.

i know. but if you need a quick fix maybe the convenient store is pretty convenient. weed still is going to be sold underground and meth houses are still going to blow up with or without government intrusion

(09-20-2014 02:36 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 10:01 AM)Lush Wrote:  i grant you the meth houses blowing up is bad but if all the incentive out of manufacturing it were taken away so too would that. i know that's all conjecture, but if say you, for example, were in want of meth but your guy lived across town but sold it on the cheap or you could walk to your 7-11. but this is probably pointless to discuss with you, right?

There is little chance that you would take the incentive of making meth away because it is already cheaper to produce illicitly than it would be legally.

i know. but if you need a quick fix maybe the convenient store is pretty convenient. weed still is going to be sold underground and meth houses are still going to blow up with or without government intrusion

Pretty ridiculous post, once again.

(09-20-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:36 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 10:01 AM)Lush Wrote:  i grant you the meth houses blowing up is bad but if all the incentive out of manufacturing it were taken away so too would that. i know that's all conjecture, but if say you, for example, were in want of meth but your guy lived across town but sold it on the cheap or you could walk to your 7-11. but this is probably pointless to discuss with you, right?

There is little chance that you would take the incentive of making meth away because it is already cheaper to produce illicitly than it would be legally.

i know. but if you need a quick fix maybe the convenient store is pretty convenient. weed still is going to be sold underground and meth houses are still going to blow up with or without government intrusion

Pretty ridiculous post, once again.

explain, por favor

(09-20-2014 02:36 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 10:01 AM)Lush Wrote:  i grant you the meth houses blowing up is bad but if all the incentive out of manufacturing it were taken away so too would that. i know that's all conjecture, but if say you, for example, were in want of meth but your guy lived across town but sold it on the cheap or you could walk to your 7-11. but this is probably pointless to discuss with you, right?

There is little chance that you would take the incentive of making meth away because it is already cheaper to produce illicitly than it would be legally.

i know. but if you need a quick fix maybe the convenient store is pretty convenient. weed still is going to be sold underground and meth houses are still going to blow up with or without government intrusion

So what does decriminalizing it accomplish? Absolutely nothing other than removing any recourse if someone is caught manufacturing and selling the junk.

I could possibly concede decriminalizing marijuana and regulating it like alcohol, meaning requiring stores to purchase distribution licenses, taxing it and vigorously prosecuting illicit cultivation and distribution. I can't, however, get on board with decriminalizing any other illicit drugs.

(09-20-2014 02:51 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:36 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 10:01 AM)Lush Wrote:  i grant you the meth houses blowing up is bad but if all the incentive out of manufacturing it were taken away so too would that. i know that's all conjecture, but if say you, for example, were in want of meth but your guy lived across town but sold it on the cheap or you could walk to your 7-11. but this is probably pointless to discuss with you, right?

There is little chance that you would take the incentive of making meth away because it is already cheaper to produce illicitly than it would be legally.

i know. but if you need a quick fix maybe the convenient store is pretty convenient. weed still is going to be sold underground and meth houses are still going to blow up with or without government intrusion

Pretty ridiculous post, once again.

explain, por favor

K, Go try your hand at trolling elsewhere.

(09-20-2014 02:55 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:51 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:36 PM)Lush Wrote:  

(09-20-2014 02:27 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  There is little chance that you would take the incentive of making meth away because it is already cheaper to produce illicitly than it would be legally.

i know. but if you need a quick fix maybe the convenient store is pretty convenient. weed still is going to be sold underground and meth houses are still going to blow up with or without government intrusion

Pretty ridiculous post, once again.

explain, por favor

K, Go try your hand at trolling elsewhere.

gotcha. that's your strategy. cop out