(09-13-2014 09:09 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  Look at the stats. The difference was the turnovers. We were out gained by only 22 yards. Our run game has suffered but Holman played well. Lots to work with. We had a lot of short fields. http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/gamecast?g...roupId=151

This is what really bums me out about this game. We were beaten, and the better team won, but the average viewer just sees a 28 point shellacking on the ticker and assumes we were run roughshod over. Mizzou had to fight for it's yardage, our D did a good job, we moved the ball fairly well, but we shot ourselves in the foot so many times the score looks different than the game did.

I don't see us beating Mizzou on the best of days this year, it's hard to win a game when a teams strongest unit lines up against your weakest, but they're not 28 points better than us.