42-24, Dukes.

If we don't score over 50 points, I will be surprised. If we don't hold St. Franny to 14 or less, I will be surprised as well.

(09-09-2014 01:44 PM)BleedingPurple Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 12:11 PM)Raven1 Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 11:17 AM)JMU85 Wrote:  JMU - 52
SFU - 24


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JMU 82
SFU 3

Not happening. A score like this requires the opposition to earn no more than 3 first downs in a game. Our "D" is just not there.

I don't know about that. UNC seemed to put up a like number last year with 5 minutes less on the game clock no less, and by playing the cheerleaders in the 4th quarter against ODU.

(09-10-2014 08:14 AM)Longhorn Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 01:44 PM)BleedingPurple Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 12:11 PM)Raven1 Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 11:17 AM)JMU85 Wrote:  JMU - 52
SFU - 24


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JMU 82
SFU 3

Not happening. A score like this requires the opposition to earn no more than 3 first downs in a game. Our "D" is just not there.

I don't know about that. UNC seemed to put up a like number last year with 5 minutes less on the game clock no less, and by playing the cheerleaders in the 4th quarter against ODU.

That game was very unusual as ODU had the lead at 10 - 7 with 5 minutes left on the clock in the first quarter and only down 13 - 14 at the end of that first quarter. When the 2nd quarter began, ODU must have thought the game was over as they didn't send a team on the field from then on.

(09-09-2014 08:17 PM)BDKJMU Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 07:59 PM)JMU85 Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 07:56 PM)BDKJMU Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 06:53 PM)SQZJMU Wrote:  

(09-09-2014 06:40 PM)DoubleDDuke Wrote:  I hope this is a chance for the front 7 to get their S together. I can't put my finger on why they've been so bad. We're not small and it's not like we can't run but we're just not getting off blocks. I really don't know, I'm not a coach but it needs to get fixed. Getting Steele back won't hurt but I don't think that's going to be a silver bullet. Hopefully the coaches are really riding these guys on what they're doing wrong.

This is especially important since St. Francis has a decent runner, and their OL is not puny (nor their DL by the way). So I assess that the score will most reflect how the Defensive front amps up, or does not. This will not be a blowout given the indicators to date.

Well they did lose Fat Albert...

Not sure but that Dude is massive.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Now he was a senior last season, all listed 6'3"/401 pounds of him. And who and the hell would list anyone at 401? I mean when you're that big it should be 5 pound increments, either 400 or 405.
http://www.sfuathletics.com/roster.aspx?...h=football

Funniest thing was when they went back to punt, he was the wall the last 2 seasons when JMU played them (well, 3/4 of it). The other guy in the wall and the rest of the coverage team would run down the field as/after the ball was punted. As soon as the ball was punted, he immediately turned to the sideline and began waddling off, even while the play was still going on. No attempt to cover the punt..never seen anything like it before.

I recall noticing that as well. Pretty damn funny. It was almost as if they were concerned he'd still be making his way off as the next play was run, so he had to get an early start.

JMU - 45

St. Francis - 17

JMU 45, STFU 20