Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

Go away troll

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

if you are going to make a thread like this atleast post a link to it

lol i just read the article for it..according to this guy's article which mostly bases it on win/loss percentage, not quality of win

according to this "objective" chart..c-usa is better than the big 12 and big 10 offcourse

he even points out that that isnt true but that his formula is just an indication of the nice start for c-usa

and he states in the same article " Conference USA looks to still be a conference developing talent and programs and is more of a long-term project compared to some of the other conferences like the Mountain West or American, but this is certainly a great way to get started"

he basically just says the AAC and MWC conference are better but that c-usa is having a nice start
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

(09-08-2014 11:21 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

if you are going to make a thread like this atleast post a link to it

lol i just read the article for it..according to this guy's article which mostly bases it on win/loss percentage, not quality of win

according to this "objective" chart..c-usa is better than the big 12 and big 10 offcourse

he even points out that that isnt true but that his formula is just an indication of the nice start for c-usa

and he states in the same article " Conference USA looks to still be a conference developing talent and programs and is more of a long-term project compared to some of the other conferences like the Mountain West or American, but this is certainly a great way to get started"

he basically just says the AAC and MWC conference are better but that c-usa is having a nice start
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

I meant too. I apologize.

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

And we are better early on than them. Shame you all left such a good league. I told you we made many upgrades.

UTSA > SMU, or Houston
UNT > SMU
ODU > Memphis
MTSU > Memphis = ECU
WKU > Tulsa
La Tech > Tulane

Only real loss is UCF. Others are an upgrade across the board.

(09-08-2014 05:08 PM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:21 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

if you are going to make a thread like this atleast post a link to it

lol i just read the article for it..according to this guy's article which mostly bases it on win/loss percentage, not quality of win

according to this "objective" chart..c-usa is better than the big 12 and big 10 offcourse

he even points out that that isnt true but that his formula is just an indication of the nice start for c-usa

and he states in the same article " Conference USA looks to still be a conference developing talent and programs and is more of a long-term project compared to some of the other conferences like the Mountain West or American, but this is certainly a great way to get started"

he basically just says the AAC and MWC conference are better but that c-usa is having a nice start
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

I meant too. I apologize.

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

And we are better early on than them. Shame you all left such a good league. I told you we made many upgrades.

UTSA > SMU, or Houston
UNT > SMU
ODU > Memphis
MTSU > Memphis = ECU
WKU > Tulsa
La Tech > Tulane

Only real loss is UCF. Others are an upgrade across the board.

We beat MTSU last year in one of there best years at MTSU idiot. Tulsa is better than WKU, same with Tulane. SMU is in for market and basketball. Memphis is better than ODU and about even with MTSU, but again top 25 bball team.

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

(09-08-2014 05:08 PM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:21 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

if you are going to make a thread like this atleast post a link to it

lol i just read the article for it..according to this guy's article which mostly bases it on win/loss percentage, not quality of win

according to this "objective" chart..c-usa is better than the big 12 and big 10 offcourse

he even points out that that isnt true but that his formula is just an indication of the nice start for c-usa

and he states in the same article " Conference USA looks to still be a conference developing talent and programs and is more of a long-term project compared to some of the other conferences like the Mountain West or American, but this is certainly a great way to get started"

he basically just says the AAC and MWC conference are better but that c-usa is having a nice start
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

I meant too. I apologize.

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

And we are better early on than them. Shame you all left such a good league. I told you we made many upgrades.

UTSA > SMU, or Houston
UNT > SMU
ODU > Memphis
MTSU > Memphis = ECU
WKU > Tulsa
La Tech > Tulane

Only real loss is UCF. Others are an upgrade across the board.

lol so 1 game and now fbs start up utsa is now better than Houston?..forgetting houston blew them out last year..we'll see how much better they are next year literally graduating half the team next year and onward..you can argue utsa is a better team this season but to say utsa is a better prgram is a joke , every team has up and down, are you saying temple is a better program than vanderbilt? get real...upset wins dont mean they are better program...

and on what drunk world is mtsu better than ecu on any level?
ill give you the memphis football and mtsu argument as a football program (despite memphis is projected a better season this year), but odu, the fcs start up???? you can stop now...

im hoping you are joking because most of your argument sounds dumb..

Why do people like this post stuff like this? It's like a kid bragging about his first pube.

(09-08-2014 05:08 PM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:21 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

if you are going to make a thread like this atleast post a link to it

lol i just read the article for it..according to this guy's article which mostly bases it on win/loss percentage, not quality of win

according to this "objective" chart..c-usa is better than the big 12 and big 10 offcourse

he even points out that that isnt true but that his formula is just an indication of the nice start for c-usa

and he states in the same article " Conference USA looks to still be a conference developing talent and programs and is more of a long-term project compared to some of the other conferences like the Mountain West or American, but this is certainly a great way to get started"

he basically just says the AAC and MWC conference are better but that c-usa is having a nice start
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

I meant too. I apologize.

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

And we are better early on than them. Shame you all left such a good league. I told you we made many upgrades.

UTSA > SMU, or Houston
UNT > SMU
ODU < Memphis
MTSU < Memphis = ECU
WKU < Tulsa
La Tech < Tulane

Only real loss is UCF. Others are an upgrade across the board.

FIFY

CUSA is just a stepping stone

For most of its existence, the Big East was better than the B1G and ACC.

It was irrelevant.

[quote='goherd24herdfans' pid='11092262' dateline='1410214136']


Like his buddies muato and banker this Marshall supporter is still trying to win a cusa football championship on paper with NO results to show. Now just go back to your loser buddies......and tell each other how good Marshall is with its water down schedule.

I know I am late to the party to put this troll in place but why the hell didn't anybody point out that our conference makes over 3 times as much money as CUSA? Or that at 11 members we will bring in over double the amount of NCAA credit income as their 14 team conference?

I guess the fact that all the TV networks feel were 3 times more valuable might just mess up his argument...but then again were talking to someone who loves a team that is second even in a god forsaken state like West Virginia.

but take hope Marshal fans, with your miserably low academic rankings you'll always be able to sign those athletes that cant get into AAC schools.

(09-08-2014 05:08 PM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:21 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

if you are going to make a thread like this atleast post a link to it

lol i just read the article for it..according to this guy's article which mostly bases it on win/loss percentage, not quality of win

according to this "objective" chart..c-usa is better than the big 12 and big 10 offcourse

he even points out that that isnt true but that his formula is just an indication of the nice start for c-usa

and he states in the same article " Conference USA looks to still be a conference developing talent and programs and is more of a long-term project compared to some of the other conferences like the Mountain West or American, but this is certainly a great way to get started"

he basically just says the AAC and MWC conference are better but that c-usa is having a nice start
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

I meant too. I apologize.

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

And we are better early on than them. Shame you all left such a good league. I told you we made many upgrades.

UTSA > SMU, or Houston
UNT > SMU
ODU > Memphis
MTSU > Memphis = ECU
WKU > Tulsa
La Tech > Tulane

Only real loss is UCF. Others are an upgrade across the board.

If you honest believe that you are delusional. Even on a down year the AAC is equal or better than C-USA in football. In basketball you will not hold a candle to us. Can't wait for next year when Marshall goes back to their 2-10 usual.

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

... as if Marshall would turn down an invite to the American.

(09-08-2014 05:08 PM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:21 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 11:11 AM)goherd24herdfans Wrote:  Objectively.... CUSA > AAC... storm clouds rainin down..... and cincy is about to lose to toledo

if you are going to make a thread like this atleast post a link to it

lol i just read the article for it..according to this guy's article which mostly bases it on win/loss percentage, not quality of win

according to this "objective" chart..c-usa is better than the big 12 and big 10 offcourse

he even points out that that isnt true but that his formula is just an indication of the nice start for c-usa

and he states in the same article " Conference USA looks to still be a conference developing talent and programs and is more of a long-term project compared to some of the other conferences like the Mountain West or American, but this is certainly a great way to get started"

he basically just says the AAC and MWC conference are better but that c-usa is having a nice start
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

I meant too. I apologize.

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com...onference/

And we are better early on than them. Shame you all left such a good league. I told you we made many upgrades.

UTSA > SMU, or Houston
UNT > SMU
ODU > Memphis
MTSU > Memphis = ECU
WKU > Tulsa
La Tech > Tulane

Only real loss is UCF. Others are an upgrade across the board.

wow...