The most urgent matter of our time isn’t Islamic Terrorism, Putin, the economy, our non-borders, poverty, hunger, or even race relations in the US. It’s ice melting and we’re the cause. Benghazi Betty strikes again.

Quote:“At Sen. Harry Reid’s National Clean Energy Summit, Clinton called climate change “the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face as a nation and a world.”

“When the history is written of the 20th and 21st century, there will be a special place for Hillary Clinton in the world leader category”

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hi...10621.html

I just think stupid when I see a picture of her.

Eh, consider her audience at the time of her speech. If she was talking to pork producers in Iowa she would have said that bacon was the most urgent challenge the nation faces. She's a politician. She lies and tells people what they want to hear.

Naw, she actually believes it.

Quote:“When the history is written of the 20th and 21st century, there will be a special place for Hillary Clinton in the world leader category”

Yeah 'FAILURE'

Didn't She learn ANYTHING from OBAMA?

(09-05-2014 09:02 AM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Naw, she actually believes it.

Hillary believes in nothing.

With the one exception of herself.

judging by her abject failure at accomplishing it, one would think that her biggest challenge in her lifetime was keeping her husband's dick in his pants.

Her failure as SOS should give intelligent people pause. That and being married to Slick Willy should make people cringe at the thought of her being elected president.

McKitrick paper: no warming for 19 years

The Guardian in 2009 predicted five years of rapid warming:

The world faces record-breaking temperatures as the sun’s activity increases, leading the planet to heat up significantly faster than scientists had predicted for the next five years, according to a study.

The hottest year on record was 1998, and the relatively cool years since have led to some global warming sceptics claiming that temperatures have levelled off or started to decline. But new research firmly rejects that argument.

The research, to be published in Geophysical Research Letters, was carried out by Judith Lean, of the US Naval Research Laboratory, and David Rind, of Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

Fail. Five more years of no warming followed.

Professsor Ross McKitrick says in a new paper that the warming pause has now lasted an astonishing 19 years at the surface and 16-26 years in the lower troposphere:




The IPCC has drawn attention to an apparent leveling-off of globally-averaged temperatures over the past 15 years or so.... Here, I propose a method for estimating the duration of the hiatus that is robust to unknown forms of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation (HAC) in the temperature series and to cherry-picking of endpoints… Application of the method shows that there is now a trendless interval of 19 years duration at the end of the HadCRUT4 surface temperature series, and of 16 – 26 years in the lower troposphere. Use of a simple AR1 trend model suggests a shorter hiatus of 14 – 20 years but is likely unreliable…

While the HadCRUT4 record clearly shows numerous pauses and dips amid the overall upward trend, the ending hiatus is of particular note because climate models project continuing warming over the period. Since 1990, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rose from 354 ppm to just under 400 ppm, a 13% increase…

In the surface data we compute a hiatus length of 19 years, and in the lower tropospheric data we compute a hiatus length of 16 years in the UAH series and 26 years in the RSS series.

This is “the science”. Why do warmists keep ignoring it?

(Via the ever-excellent Watts Up With That.)

UPDATE

With the science against the faith it has so frantically promoted, the UN searches for someone who will turn the debate. Note well: it’s looking for someone who isn’t a scientist but who can play on guilt, racial politics, gender politics and victimhood:


The United Nations is looking for a young woman to, as BBC put it, be the ‘Malala’ of the climate change movement, serving as a voice that will energize this September’s climate change conference.

The organization has put out a call for a woman under 30 to speak at the opening session of the 2014 Climate Summit, which is being held on September 23 in New York City. The woman has to be from a developing country and must have a background that includes advocacy on climate change or work on implementing climate mitigation or adaptation solutions. So far, the call for applicants has drawn 544 women, who emailed short videos of themselves persuading world leaders to act on climate change to the Secretary-General’s office.

The UN has outed itself with this stunt. Its criteria ensure no leading climate scientists need apply. See, this is no longer about science at all.

Nothing new here .....Just another egg sucking boot licker plying her wares to the sycophants. I don't BTW give the GOP nincompoops any pass on doing this either. Both gangs leaderships are useless bootlickers.