(09-07-2014 08:47 AM)J Coog Wrote:  

(09-06-2014 11:10 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 08:59 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  If I were a betting man, I would be all over getting ECU and 17 points. I think ECU has very good shot of winning and I feel 99% they cover this spread.

How did that bet work out for you?

I'm guessing it worked out fine. The final score was 33-23. 33-23 = 10. 10<17. Therefore, poster won said bet.

Dick post, Louisville fan. Your school's fans usually have more class than that.

LOL, this^^^^^^^.

(09-07-2014 08:47 AM)J Coog Wrote:  

(09-06-2014 11:10 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 08:59 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  If I were a betting man, I would be all over getting ECU and 17 points. I think ECU has very good shot of winning and I feel 99% they cover this spread.

How did that bet work out for you?

I'm guessing it worked out fine. The final score was 33-23. 33-23 = 10. 10<17. Therefore, poster won said bet.

Dick post, Louisville fan. Your school's fans usually have more class than that.

LOL, this^^^^^^^.
Without regard to anyone's particular math aptitude.

The American went 0-7 against FBS competition. How exactly is it above the rest of the G5???

(09-07-2014 08:47 AM)J Coog Wrote:  

(09-06-2014 11:10 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 08:59 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  If I were a betting man, I would be all over getting ECU and 17 points. I think ECU has very good shot of winning and I feel 99% they cover this spread.

How did that bet work out for you?

I'm guessing it worked out fine. The final score was 33-23. 33-23 = 10. 10<17. Therefore, poster won said bet.

Dick post, Louisville fan. Your school's fans usually have more class than that.

That wasn't a "dick"'post. I was being a smart ass and was asking because If I was "99% sure" of something like that, I'd place the bet. I was basically asking if he was ballsy enough to place the bet. Meaning his response would be "I'm in he money" or "damn I knew I should have placed the bet."

Before you try and call someone out as a "dick," try reading he god damned post first. Bogh of you. Talking ra out math altitude, reading comprehension is somethingi suggest you work on. I mean unless you fans how where I said or implied they didn't cover. I am not responsible for your assumptions. Dicks.

(09-07-2014 09:24 AM)Cali_Cat Wrote:  The American went 0-7 against FBS competition. How exactly is it above the rest of the G5???

Tulsa, Tulane, Memphis, USF, and ECU were all underdogs against P5 teams. Three played the P5 team tight, one was worn down 38-21, and one was absolutely crushed.

Let's wait until the end of the season.

(09-07-2014 10:12 AM)adcorbett Wrote:  

(09-07-2014 08:47 AM)J Coog Wrote:  

(09-06-2014 11:10 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 08:59 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  If I were a betting man, I would be all over getting ECU and 17 points. I think ECU has very good shot of winning and I feel 99% they cover this spread.

How did that bet work out for you?

I'm guessing it worked out fine. The final score was 33-23. 33-23 = 10. 10<17. Therefore, poster won said bet.

Dick post, Louisville fan. Your school's fans usually have more class than that.

That wasn't a "dick"'post. I was being a smart ass and was asking because If I was "99% sure" of something like that, I'd place the bet. I was basically asking if he was ballsy enough to place the bet. Meaning his response would be "I'm in he money" or "damn I knew I should have placed the bet."

Before you try and call someone out as a "dick," try reading he god damned post first. Bogh of you. Talking ra out math altitude, reading comprehension is somethingi suggest you work on. I mean unless you fans how where I said or implied they didn't cover. I am not responsible for your assumptions. Dicks.

Wut?

(09-05-2014 01:58 AM)shere khan Wrote:  I like tulane to save us

Hence the problem wit this conference.