(09-03-2014 08:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 06:00 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 05:34 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:58 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  [quote='Brokeback Flamer' pid='11064472' dateline='1409752531']
[quote='oklalittledixie' pid='11064430' dateline='1409751895']

all that has to be changed is a law. Nothing more.

To make murder legal, all that has to change is a law. Nothing more.
To make grand theft auto legal, all that has to change is a law, nothing more
To make arson legal, all that has to change is a law, nothing more.
To allow 5 year olds to work in the coal mines, all that has to change is a law nothing more
To make rape legal, all that has to change is a law, nothing more.

agreed.

And the odds of that happening in any of those cases

On our current path, quite good.

Please show me where there is legislation being offered to legalize rape, 5 year old coal miners and arson.

(09-03-2014 08:24 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 06:00 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 05:34 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  To make murder legal, all that has to change is a law. Nothing more.
To make grand theft auto legal, all that has to change is a law, nothing more
To make arson legal, all that has to change is a law, nothing more.
To allow 5 year olds to work in the coal mines, all that has to change is a law nothing more
To make rape legal, all that has to change is a law, nothing more.

agreed.

And the odds of that happening in any of those cases

On our current path, quite good.

Please show me where there is legislation being offered to legalize rape, 5 year old coal miners and arson.

That's not what you asked. Please read the previous posts before you ask me another question.

(09-03-2014 08:50 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:24 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 06:00 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  agreed.

And the odds of that happening in any of those cases

On our current path, quite good.

Please show me where there is legislation being offered to legalize rape, 5 year old coal miners and arson.

That's not what you asked. Please read the previous posts before you ask me another question.

I was putting the statement you made in context. You act like changing a law is easy or inevitable

(09-03-2014 09:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:50 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:24 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  And the odds of that happening in any of those cases

On our current path, quite good.

Please show me where there is legislation being offered to legalize rape, 5 year old coal miners and arson.

That's not what you asked. Please read the previous posts before you ask me another question.

I was putting the statement you made in context. You act like changing a law is easy or inevitable

No you weren't. You asked me what the odds that those examples become a reality. I answered your question by saying quite good if we remain on our current course. I stand by that statement.

Your follow-up question was fallacious. I never claimed that there are people currently advocating the legalization of rape.

I have already given proof that there are legislators here in America trying to normalize and legalize pedophilia. I also provided material backing up my claim this is a result of the slippery slope the gaystapo has set in action.

Now go read what I have already posted and I will follow up with you tomorrow.

(09-03-2014 09:55 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 09:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:50 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:24 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  On our current path, quite good.

Please show me where there is legislation being offered to legalize rape, 5 year old coal miners and arson.

That's not what you asked. Please read the previous posts before you ask me another question.

I was putting the statement you made in context. You act like changing a law is easy or inevitable

No you weren't. You asked me what the odds that those examples become a reality. I answered your question by saying quite good if we remain on our current course. I stand by that statement.

Your follow-up question was fallacious. I never claimed that there are people currently advocating the legalization of rape.

I have already given proof that there are legislators here in America trying to normalize and legalize pedophilia. I also provided material backing up my claim this is a result of the slippery slope the gaystapo has set in action.

Now go read what I have already posted and I will follow up with you tomorrow.

I have read them. To say 'All that needs to happen is to change the law" is overly simplistic. I was pointing that out by using your own argument. Then you said the odds of anything on my list happening are 'on our current path, quite good'. I then asked you to point what path law makers are on to legalize rape, arson etc. you then dodged the question and reformed the argument based on opinion not fact.
As for law makers trying to legalize Pedophilia, there are a small small number with no real momentum behind them. So to use that as a reference that all other things I listed can happen is not really supported by anything.

(09-03-2014 04:04 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:54 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:27 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:01 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I tell you what, sport. Your questions are the same questions I have been asking you. Who are you to decide polygamy is socially acceptable and pedophilia is not? Who are you to define what the age of consent shall be?

Your argument is "consenting adults." At what age do confirm someone is able to provide consent and how do we regulate that?

I haven't decided jack. I really don't care if Steve marries Debbie, if Steve marries Debbie, Wanda, and Bertha, if Steve marries George, or if Steve marries George, Ralph, and Jose. If by the rule of law in the state that they live they are consenting adults who are OK with the arrangement then more power to them. It doesn't affect me one way or another. In the end the reality is the only marriage that is any of my business is my own, and quite honestly this country would be a far better place if everybody had that attitude.

As for what age is someone able to consent, every single state has already established what the limits are, and in fact have provisions to allow for situations where while someone might be of real age they are mentally functioning at a lower level that puts greater restrictions on the law. There isn't a state in this country, even California, that would allow an adult to marry a child who hasn't reached the age of consent to marry or have carnal relations.

I know you don't care because you don't care about a traditional family. You believe in moral relativism. You cannot see how legalization of gay marriage opened the door for polygamy and how polygamy will open the door for pedophilia. You think "consenting adults" is a valid defense of your argument but don't realize that definition can be changed the same way marriage has been. You are for some laws but not others. You think the laws you are for will stay intact or are somehow protected from your own logic. They aren't.

BTW California is already trying to decriminalize pedophilia.

Get it through your head, sport. Social liberalism doesn't work.

Everyone with a brain is for some laws and not for others. That's the very fabric of a free society.

and I think you have a warped sense of what a free society means.

I am not free to sleep with your 15 year old daughter in many states, even if she wanted me to.

You seem to want to twist everything into sex with minors. Are you for Obamacare? Are you for laws against murder? If you answer no to the first as I would and yes to the second as I would then you are for some laws and against others.
There is nothing warped at all with my sense of a free society.

(09-04-2014 05:43 AM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 09:55 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 09:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:50 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:24 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  Please show me where there is legislation being offered to legalize rape, 5 year old coal miners and arson.

That's not what you asked. Please read the previous posts before you ask me another question.

I was putting the statement you made in context. You act like changing a law is easy or inevitable

No you weren't. You asked me what the odds that those examples become a reality. I answered your question by saying quite good if we remain on our current course. I stand by that statement.

Your follow-up question was fallacious. I never claimed that there are people currently advocating the legalization of rape.

I have already given proof that there are legislators here in America trying to normalize and legalize pedophilia. I also provided material backing up my claim this is a result of the slippery slope the gaystapo has set in action.

Now go read what I have already posted and I will follow up with you tomorrow.

I have read them. To say 'All that needs to happen is to change the law" is overly simplistic. I was pointing that out by using your own argument. Then you said the odds of anything on my list happening are 'on our current path, quite good'. I then asked you to point what path law makers are on to legalize rape, arson etc. you then dodged the question and reformed the argument based on opinion not fact.
As for law makers trying to legalize Pedophilia, there are a small small number with no real momentum behind them. So to use that as a reference that all other things I listed can happen is not really supported by anything.

Why, that's all that has happened with gay marriage and now polygamy. You aren't using my argument. You tried to suggest I claimed something I didn't.

There are a small number of gays. Gays make up less than 5% of the population and polygamous families equal less than 1%. It tales one special interest group and 1 judge - presto. So let's not pretend that legalizing pedophilia is any different - or that it won't ever happen. Watch it happen.

(09-04-2014 07:17 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 04:04 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:54 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:27 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  I haven't decided jack. I really don't care if Steve marries Debbie, if Steve marries Debbie, Wanda, and Bertha, if Steve marries George, or if Steve marries George, Ralph, and Jose. If by the rule of law in the state that they live they are consenting adults who are OK with the arrangement then more power to them. It doesn't affect me one way or another. In the end the reality is the only marriage that is any of my business is my own, and quite honestly this country would be a far better place if everybody had that attitude.

As for what age is someone able to consent, every single state has already established what the limits are, and in fact have provisions to allow for situations where while someone might be of real age they are mentally functioning at a lower level that puts greater restrictions on the law. There isn't a state in this country, even California, that would allow an adult to marry a child who hasn't reached the age of consent to marry or have carnal relations.

I know you don't care because you don't care about a traditional family. You believe in moral relativism. You cannot see how legalization of gay marriage opened the door for polygamy and how polygamy will open the door for pedophilia. You think "consenting adults" is a valid defense of your argument but don't realize that definition can be changed the same way marriage has been. You are for some laws but not others. You think the laws you are for will stay intact or are somehow protected from your own logic. They aren't.

BTW California is already trying to decriminalize pedophilia.

Get it through your head, sport. Social liberalism doesn't work.

Everyone with a brain is for some laws and not for others. That's the very fabric of a free society.

and I think you have a warped sense of what a free society means.

I am not free to sleep with your 15 year old daughter in many states, even if she wanted me to.

You seem to want to twist everything into sex with minors. Are you for Obamacare? Are you for laws against murder? If you answer no to the first as I would and yes to the second as I would then you are for some laws and against others.
There is nothing warped at all with my sense of a free society.

You are all over the map with this.

(09-04-2014 07:17 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 04:04 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:54 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:27 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  I haven't decided jack. I really don't care if Steve marries Debbie, if Steve marries Debbie, Wanda, and Bertha, if Steve marries George, or if Steve marries George, Ralph, and Jose. If by the rule of law in the state that they live they are consenting adults who are OK with the arrangement then more power to them. It doesn't affect me one way or another. In the end the reality is the only marriage that is any of my business is my own, and quite honestly this country would be a far better place if everybody had that attitude.

As for what age is someone able to consent, every single state has already established what the limits are, and in fact have provisions to allow for situations where while someone might be of real age they are mentally functioning at a lower level that puts greater restrictions on the law. There isn't a state in this country, even California, that would allow an adult to marry a child who hasn't reached the age of consent to marry or have carnal relations.

I know you don't care because you don't care about a traditional family. You believe in moral relativism. You cannot see how legalization of gay marriage opened the door for polygamy and how polygamy will open the door for pedophilia. You think "consenting adults" is a valid defense of your argument but don't realize that definition can be changed the same way marriage has been. You are for some laws but not others. You think the laws you are for will stay intact or are somehow protected from your own logic. They aren't.

BTW California is already trying to decriminalize pedophilia.

Get it through your head, sport. Social liberalism doesn't work.

Everyone with a brain is for some laws and not for others. That's the very fabric of a free society.

and I think you have a warped sense of what a free society means.

I am not free to sleep with your 15 year old daughter in many states, even if she wanted me to.

You seem to want to twist everything into sex with minors. Are you for Obamacare? Are you for laws against murder? If you answer no to the first as I would and yes to the second as I would then you are for some laws and against others.
There is nothing warped at all with my sense of a free society.

Legal sex with minors is near the top of the list on the homosexual agenda.

(09-04-2014 08:18 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-04-2014 05:43 AM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 09:55 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 09:07 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 08:50 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That's not what you asked. Please read the previous posts before you ask me another question.

I was putting the statement you made in context. You act like changing a law is easy or inevitable

No you weren't. You asked me what the odds that those examples become a reality. I answered your question by saying quite good if we remain on our current course. I stand by that statement.

Your follow-up question was fallacious. I never claimed that there are people currently advocating the legalization of rape.

I have already given proof that there are legislators here in America trying to normalize and legalize pedophilia. I also provided material backing up my claim this is a result of the slippery slope the gaystapo has set in action.

Now go read what I have already posted and I will follow up with you tomorrow.

I have read them. To say 'All that needs to happen is to change the law" is overly simplistic. I was pointing that out by using your own argument. Then you said the odds of anything on my list happening are 'on our current path, quite good'. I then asked you to point what path law makers are on to legalize rape, arson etc. you then dodged the question and reformed the argument based on opinion not fact.
As for law makers trying to legalize Pedophilia, there are a small small number with no real momentum behind them. So to use that as a reference that all other things I listed can happen is not really supported by anything.

Why, that's all that has happened with gay marriage and now polygamy. You aren't using my argument. You tried to suggest I claimed something I didn't.

There are a small number of gays. Gays make up less than 5% of the population and polygamous families equal less than 1%. It tales one special interest group and 1 judge - presto. So let's not pretend that legalizing pedophilia is any different - or that it won't ever happen. Watch it happen.

Not so long as this guy is around
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGmRJjZr9GU

(09-04-2014 08:43 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-04-2014 07:17 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 04:04 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:54 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:27 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I know you don't care because you don't care about a traditional family. You believe in moral relativism. You cannot see how legalization of gay marriage opened the door for polygamy and how polygamy will open the door for pedophilia. You think "consenting adults" is a valid defense of your argument but don't realize that definition can be changed the same way marriage has been. You are for some laws but not others. You think the laws you are for will stay intact or are somehow protected from your own logic. They aren't.

BTW California is already trying to decriminalize pedophilia.

Get it through your head, sport. Social liberalism doesn't work.

Everyone with a brain is for some laws and not for others. That's the very fabric of a free society.

and I think you have a warped sense of what a free society means.

I am not free to sleep with your 15 year old daughter in many states, even if she wanted me to.

You seem to want to twist everything into sex with minors. Are you for Obamacare? Are you for laws against murder? If you answer no to the first as I would and yes to the second as I would then you are for some laws and against others.
There is nothing warped at all with my sense of a free society.

Legal sex with minors is near the top of the list on the homosexual agenda.

That's a pretty interesting comment.

Would you mind giving a link to a story about it?

(09-04-2014 12:06 PM)ARandomHerdFan Wrote:  

(09-04-2014 08:43 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-04-2014 07:17 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 04:04 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-03-2014 03:54 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  Everyone with a brain is for some laws and not for others. That's the very fabric of a free society.

and I think you have a warped sense of what a free society means.

I am not free to sleep with your 15 year old daughter in many states, even if she wanted me to.

You seem to want to twist everything into sex with minors. Are you for Obamacare? Are you for laws against murder? If you answer no to the first as I would and yes to the second as I would then you are for some laws and against others.
There is nothing warped at all with my sense of a free society.

Legal sex with minors is near the top of the list on the homosexual agenda.

That's a pretty interesting comment.

Would you mind giving a link to a story about it?

Yeah newbie, there are threads with links to stories on at least a weekly basis. Dig through the Spin Room threads and get back to me.