(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

ESPN's rankings >>>

#35 Houston
#45 UCF
#58 Cincinnati
#75 East Carolina
#79 Memphis
#80 South Florida
#83 Tulsa
#84 Temple
#90 SMU
#94 Tulane
#95 UConn

(08-25-2014 09:21 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

ESPN's rankings >>>

#35 Houston
#45 UCF
#58 Cincinnati
#75 East Carolina
#79 Memphis
#80 South Florida
#83 Tulsa
#84 Temple
#90 SMU
#94 Tulane
#95 UConn

That is ^^^ total garbage... UCF, Cincinnati and East Carolina SHOULD be rank much higher... Heck, even SMU and South Florida.

I know at times I may sound like a homer towards this league, but I'm well aware the accomplishments many programs from this league has achieved.

(08-25-2014 09:21 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

ESPN's rankings >>>

#35 Houston
#45 UCF
#58 Cincinnati
#75 East Carolina
#79 Memphis
#80 South Florida
#83 Tulsa
#84 Temple
#90 SMU
#94 Tulane
#95 UConn

Memphis has come a long way in two short years.

(08-25-2014 02:41 PM)Bearcat2012 Wrote:  ACC (based on AP Poll alone) has the #1 , #16 and #23 teams in the country . The AAC has the #26 , #40 and well thats it. The gap is real . Not saying its right but it is what it is.

And #23 is a joke.

(08-25-2014 09:54 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 09:21 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

ESPN's rankings >>>

#35 Houston
#45 UCF
#58 Cincinnati
#75 East Carolina
#79 Memphis
#80 South Florida
#83 Tulsa
#84 Temple
#90 SMU
#94 Tulane
#95 UConn

Memphis has come a long way in two short years.

I said 5 years for Fuente to get you right and then we bring him back to Texas

(08-25-2014 10:00 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 09:54 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 09:21 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

ESPN's rankings >>>

#35 Houston
#45 UCF
#58 Cincinnati
#75 East Carolina
#79 Memphis
#80 South Florida
#83 Tulsa
#84 Temple
#90 SMU
#94 Tulane
#95 UConn

Memphis has come a long way in two short years.

I said 5 years for Fuente to get you right and then we bring him back to Texas

Memphis better show him more $$$ and soon.

#52 Kentucky

that's all you need to know about the validity of that list.

(08-25-2014 10:29 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 10:00 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 09:54 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 09:21 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

ESPN's rankings >>>

#35 Houston
#45 UCF
#58 Cincinnati
#75 East Carolina
#79 Memphis
#80 South Florida
#83 Tulsa
#84 Temple
#90 SMU
#94 Tulane
#95 UConn

Memphis has come a long way in two short years.

I said 5 years for Fuente to get you right and then we bring him back to Texas

Memphis better show him more $$$ and soon.

I know the coaches we are looking at and while they aren't splash hires at least they are respectable

(08-25-2014 09:21 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

ESPN's rankings >>>

#35 Houston
#45 UCF
#58 Cincinnati
#75 East Carolina
#79 Memphis
#80 South Florida
#83 Tulsa
#84 Temple
#90 SMU
#94 Tulane
#95 UConn

UCF, Cincinnati, and ECU's rankings are beyond ridiculous. 74 teams are better than ECU? Wow.

(08-25-2014 09:55 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 02:41 PM)Bearcat2012 Wrote:  ACC (based on AP Poll alone) has the #1 , #16 and #23 teams in the country . The AAC has the #26 , #40 and well thats it. The gap is real . Not saying its right but it is what it is.

And #23 is a joke.

#75 beat #23 by 4 touchdowns on their home field last year. These rankings are flawed I'd say.

ESPN likes to keep us right around 75.

(08-25-2014 03:01 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  Sagarin is worthless

Although I rarely agree with you; on Sagarin you are correct, sir. Sagarin IS ABSOLUTELY OF NO VALUE WHATSOEVER!!!!

so what yall are saying is that espn has a bias towards certain conferences and schools based on their viewer demographics.....well i for one am shocked at this startling realization. when did all this happen. it just kinda snuck right up on us.

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

Either way there should be more than 5 points separating AAC from MWC. This is a real kick in the balls!

BIG EAST just became BIG LEAST.

Your jealousy of UCF's success is clear. Just sit back and shut up until you can beat UCF, and then we'll congratulate UH and welcome you to the big time.*

Just when on the gridiron everything else is just BS

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(08-26-2014 08:10 PM)NestaKnight1 Wrote:  

(08-25-2014 07:09 PM)willhclark Wrote:  but the ratings are clearly flawed because they have Houston ahead of almighty UCF

http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../_/tab/fpi

Either way there should be more than 5 points separating AAC from MWC. This is a real kick in the balls!

BIG EAST just became BIG LEAST.

Your jealousy of UCF's success is clear. Just sit back and shut up until you can beat UCF, and then we'll congratulate UH and welcome you to the big time.*

big time UCF