(08-21-2014 12:31 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:28 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:25 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:23 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:16 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  Unless you have evidence of impropriety, you don't get to pick the investigators or prosecutors. If you don't like it, TOUGH!

That's how I feel too. Brown defamed his own character with the choices he made that day, and it's on camera. The people can say it's not him all they want, but they better come up with a 6'4" 300 pound black man that looks exactly like him if they're going to try to disprove his involvement.

Not to mention his clothes and the fact he was with his buddy and miraculously had the cigars on him. But then again...it could be someone else...maybe his twin....he does have twin, right?

He's got to... Probably the one that must have gotten scared and left the country and will never be seen or heard from again.

Maybe he's hiding at Fit's house.

Lmao!

(08-21-2014 12:55 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:31 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:28 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:25 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 12:23 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  That's how I feel too. Brown defamed his own character with the choices he made that day, and it's on camera. The people can say it's not him all they want, but they better come up with a 6'4" 300 pound black man that looks exactly like him if they're going to try to disprove his involvement.

Not to mention his clothes and the fact he was with his buddy and miraculously had the cigars on him. But then again...it could be someone else...maybe his twin....he does have twin, right?

He's got to... Probably the one that must have gotten scared and left the country and will never be seen or heard from again.

Maybe he's hiding at Fit's house.

Lmao!

Staying at "Fit"bud's house might be a good thing if he needed to get in shape.

(08-21-2014 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why not let an independent investigation happen to limit the amount of tension? Allowing the locals to run the show is only going to give the appearance of a cover up.

You mean like a special prosecutor? Where have we heard that before?

(08-21-2014 01:06 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why not let an independent investigation happen to limit the amount of tension? Allowing the locals to run the show is only going to give the appearance of a cover up.

You mean like a special prosecutor? Where have we heard that before?

I don't know all of the local officials and their politics. However, I have heard that locals don't trust some of them to conduct a thorough investigation.

(08-21-2014 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:06 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why not let an independent investigation happen to limit the amount of tension? Allowing the locals to run the show is only going to give the appearance of a cover up.

You mean like a special prosecutor? Where have we heard that before?

I don't know all of the local officials and their politics. However, I have heard that locals don't trust some of them to conduct a thorough investigation.

I heard that the DOJ Civil Rights Division doesn't like to investigate black on white crime and therefore people don't trust them to conduct a thorough investigation.

(08-21-2014 12:01 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:59 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why not let an independent investigation happen to limit the amount of tension? Allowing the locals to run the show is only going to give the appearance of a cover up.

Isn't that why the Feds are there?

Yes. And they should be. It's a high profile case.

I beg to differ. If the roles were reversed,..this wouldn't even make the news other than in Ferguson, MO.

The President, the Gov. and the media are making this a high profile case.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(08-21-2014 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:06 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why not let an independent investigation happen to limit the amount of tension? Allowing the locals to run the show is only going to give the appearance of a cover up.

You mean like a special prosecutor? Where have we heard that before?

I don't know all of the local officials and their politics. However, I have heard that locals don't trust some of them to conduct a thorough investigation.

Considering how quick to jump those locals are, I wouldn't believe a word they said. They just want revenge for Brown, they don't really care about facts.

(08-21-2014 11:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:47 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:43 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:01 AM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  All you have to do is listen to both stories. One of them actually makes sense and can be easily repeated because of its consistency (the officer's). The other story is inconsistent and unable to be repeated with accuracy (Mr. Brown's friend and accomplice). The forensic evidence does not match up with it and the story makes no sense once you think it through.

To me, you have to ask two very important questions:
1. Does the officer have a record of abusing his authority against the people he polices (have there been any complaints against him, including in his personal capacity)? No. Because if such things existed, the DoJ, Governor, and media would have released this and talked about it endlessly.
2. Does Mr. Brown have a record of intimidating or assaulting others and/or showing a disregard for authority? Yes. He just committed strong arm robbery and assault and then, according to his friend, disobeyed a lawful order to get out of the street.

Does this prove 100% what happened? no. But, what it does show is that the narrative of Mr. Brown's supporters does not match the history of the officer in question. Whereas, the officer's account (as relayed by others) is consistent with the prior conduct of Mr. Brown.

I don't think any lawyer worth $1 would allow their past to be a part of the evidence or influence of a jury.

You're right, they would want that thrown out, but the video prior to the shooting should be allowed as evidence.

Why? That would influence the jury and give them a negative image of Mike Brown.

The case should be about whether or not the police officer acted in self defense.

Mike Brown is not on trial here.

It goes to Mike Browns mindset when he was confronted by a cop... Remember how important Trayvon's mindset was about the creepy ass cracker following him around?

Mindset of both people in a conflict matter.

(08-21-2014 01:59 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:06 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why not let an independent investigation happen to limit the amount of tension? Allowing the locals to run the show is only going to give the appearance of a cover up.

You mean like a special prosecutor? Where have we heard that before?

I don't know all of the local officials and their politics. However, I have heard that locals don't trust some of them to conduct a thorough investigation.

I heard that the DOJ Civil Rights Division doesn't like to investigate black on white crime and therefore people don't trust them to conduct a thorough investigation.

They also like to put cops away.

I think this is the same team that in New Orleans, they leaked information to the public via a blog and it caught a Federal Judges attention.. He wrote a 129 page brief about how all should be stripped of their position... Oddly enough their boss hasn't reprimanded them yet.. They answer to Holder.

(08-21-2014 02:34 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:59 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:06 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Why not let an independent investigation happen to limit the amount of tension? Allowing the locals to run the show is only going to give the appearance of a cover up.

You mean like a special prosecutor? Where have we heard that before?

I don't know all of the local officials and their politics. However, I have heard that locals don't trust some of them to conduct a thorough investigation.

I heard that the DOJ Civil Rights Division doesn't like to investigate black on white crime and therefore people don't trust them to conduct a thorough investigation.

They also like to put cops away.

I think this is the same team that in New Orleans, they leaked information to the public via a blog and it caught a Federal Judges attention.. He wrote a 129 page brief about how all should be stripped of their position... Oddly enough their boss hasn't reprimanded them yet.. They answer to Holder.

Not just a blog, they went on local news sites and made up accounts and put out misleading information. And, you're right...no reprimand. In fact, I would guess some of those people are in Missouri.

(08-21-2014 03:15 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 02:34 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:59 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:14 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(08-21-2014 01:06 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  You mean like a special prosecutor? Where have we heard that before?

I don't know all of the local officials and their politics. However, I have heard that locals don't trust some of them to conduct a thorough investigation.

I heard that the DOJ Civil Rights Division doesn't like to investigate black on white crime and therefore people don't trust them to conduct a thorough investigation.

They also like to put cops away.

I think this is the same team that in New Orleans, they leaked information to the public via a blog and it caught a Federal Judges attention.. He wrote a 129 page brief about how all should be stripped of their position... Oddly enough their boss hasn't reprimanded them yet.. They answer to Holder.

Not just a blog, they went on local news sites and made up accounts and put out misleading information. And, you're right...no reprimand. In fact, I would guess some of those people are in Missouri.

Word is, the entire team is.