(08-08-2014 02:05 AM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 12:00 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  If drug cartels were sending rockets into El Paso & San Diego - or any border town-, how should the US respond?

Obama would talk about diplomacy and send Mexico a few billion dollars to stop firing rockets at us.

(08-08-2014 12:00 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  If drug cartels were sending rockets into El Paso & San Diego - or any border town-, how should the US respond?

The first thing I would do it give the military 2 orders:

Stop the rockets
Do whatever it takes to prevent them from being launched again

Then I would tell the State Dept to tell Mexico that if they can't prevent this from happening again, we will.

(08-08-2014 09:41 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:21 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:14 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I don't say this often, but that guy is a f*cking moron.

Im sorry Im crapping over your stupid scenario, that will never happen because its a completely stupid scenario, thus making it no point in relating it to an actual real word scenario.

If it's a completely stupid scenario why even respond? Son, there are topics that I'll agree with Fitbud and disagree with Okla, then there are topics where I'll agree with Okla and disagree with Fitbud... And every time I'll be respectful.

Open up a dictionary and find the definition to HYPOTHETICAL. The point of this is regarding Israel and how they respond to Hamas. For f*cks sake, even I said this was illogical and never going to happen.

Smoke a joint sometime. Not every topic needs be vehemently debated when it's a simple, but yet ILLOGICAL, hypothetical.

Hypothetical from merriam-webster: involving or based on a suggested idea or theory : involving or based on a hypothesis

Hypothesis: Is the explanation for something has occured

Thus based on the definition of hyptohetical/hypothesis (which along with theory is a word that gets abused alot), you scenario isnt one, because it would never happen.

And your right not every topic needs to be debated, yet you choose to start a threat that involved an asinine scenario that would never happen in order to draw parallels to Israels war with Hamas.

How about this for a hypothetical situation: A terroist organization much like Hamas sends 19 operatives to attack America, how would we react? OH WAIT! It already happened and we know how we would react if we were attacked! Another reason why there was no point in debating this stupid scenario.

How about this for a hypothetical situation: A terroist organization much like Hamas sends 19 operatives to attack America, how would we react? OH WAIT! It already happened and we know how we would react if we were attacked! Another reason why there was no point in debating this stupid scenario.

Amidst all of the arguing about realistic hypothetical situations, seems like we can
agree that the American response to 9/11 is basically the same as what Israel is doing now.

(08-08-2014 09:30 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:21 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:14 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I don't say this often, but that guy is a f*cking moron.

Im sorry Im crapping over your stupid scenario, that will never happen because its a completely stupid scenario, thus making it no point in relating it to an actual real word scenario.

Do you know what Hypothetical means. What are you like 10?

WTH, man! That is a low blow. How dare you insult 10 year olds like that!!!!!!!

(08-08-2014 11:56 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:41 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:21 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:14 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I don't say this often, but that guy is a f*cking moron.

Im sorry Im crapping over your stupid scenario, that will never happen because its a completely stupid scenario, thus making it no point in relating it to an actual real word scenario.

If it's a completely stupid scenario why even respond? Son, there are topics that I'll agree with Fitbud and disagree with Okla, then there are topics where I'll agree with Okla and disagree with Fitbud... And every time I'll be respectful.

Open up a dictionary and find the definition to HYPOTHETICAL. The point of this is regarding Israel and how they respond to Hamas. For f*cks sake, even I said this was illogical and never going to happen.

Smoke a joint sometime. Not every topic needs be vehemently debated when it's a simple, but yet ILLOGICAL, hypothetical.

Hypothetical from merriam-webster: involving or based on a suggested idea or theory : involving or based on a hypothesis

Hypothesis: Is the explanation for something has occured

Thus based on the definition of hyptohetical/hypothesis (which along with theory is a word that gets abused alot), you scenario isnt one, because it would never happen.

And your right not every topic needs to be debated, yet you choose to start a threat that involved an asinine scenario that would never happen in order to draw parallels to Israels war with Hamas.

How about this for a hypothetical situation: A terroist organization much like Hamas sends 19 operatives to attack America, how would we react? OH WAIT! It already happened and we know how we would react if we were attacked! Another reason why there was no point in debating this stupid scenario.

How about this scenario: If you don't like the thread, don't click on the thread. If the thread insults your "intelligence", don't respond to the thread.

Holy h*ll, my 6 year old neice could figure this out. Why can't you?

(08-08-2014 11:56 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:41 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:21 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:14 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I don't say this often, but that guy is a f*cking moron.

Im sorry Im crapping over your stupid scenario, that will never happen because its a completely stupid scenario, thus making it no point in relating it to an actual real word scenario.

If it's a completely stupid scenario why even respond? Son, there are topics that I'll agree with Fitbud and disagree with Okla, then there are topics where I'll agree with Okla and disagree with Fitbud... And every time I'll be respectful.

Open up a dictionary and find the definition to HYPOTHETICAL. The point of this is regarding Israel and how they respond to Hamas. For f*cks sake, even I said this was illogical and never going to happen.

Smoke a joint sometime. Not every topic needs be vehemently debated when it's a simple, but yet ILLOGICAL, hypothetical.

Hypothetical from merriam-webster: involving or based on a suggested idea or theory : involving or based on a hypothesis

Hypothesis: Is the explanation for something has occured

Thus based on the definition of hyptohetical/hypothesis (which along with theory is a word that gets abused alot), you scenario isnt one, because it would never happen.

And your right not every topic needs to be debated, yet you choose to start a threat that involved an asinine scenario that would never happen in order to draw parallels to Israels war with Hamas.

How about this for a hypothetical situation: A terroist organization much like Hamas sends 19 operatives to attack America, how would we react? OH WAIT! It already happened and we know how we would react if we were attacked! Another reason why there was no point in debating this stupid scenario.

Therefore, Israel HAS EVERY RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. Hence the point of my scenario. It had nothing to do with cartels firing rockets at our border towns. And that's why you're a retard for over-thinking the entire point of the thread.

That's funny because sometimes I come up with hypothetical scenarios that just drives my wife crazy. The one I like is when I ask her what will we do if we win the lottery. One answer she gives me is I'll find a younger, handsomer husband with my half. That always cracks me up.

Because I think she's kidding. LOL

(08-08-2014 01:27 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  That's funny because sometimes I come up with hypothetical scenarios that just drives my wife crazy. The one I like is when I ask her what will we do if we win the lottery. One answer she gives me is I'll find a younger, handsomer husband with my half. That always cracks me up.

Because I think she's kidding. LOL

Save yourself some grief, only put one name on the ticket. ITS community property anyway. When she says that, you say "Over my dead body", if she replies "that could be arranged", time to rethink.......

Hypothetically speaking that is...

(08-08-2014 12:00 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  If drug cartels were sending rockets into El Paso & San Diego - or any border town-, how should the US respond?

(08-08-2014 01:12 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 11:56 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:41 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:21 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:14 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  I don't say this often, but that guy is a f*cking moron.

Im sorry Im crapping over your stupid scenario, that will never happen because its a completely stupid scenario, thus making it no point in relating it to an actual real word scenario.

If it's a completely stupid scenario why even respond? Son, there are topics that I'll agree with Fitbud and disagree with Okla, then there are topics where I'll agree with Okla and disagree with Fitbud... And every time I'll be respectful.

Open up a dictionary and find the definition to HYPOTHETICAL. The point of this is regarding Israel and how they respond to Hamas. For f*cks sake, even I said this was illogical and never going to happen.

Smoke a joint sometime. Not every topic needs be vehemently debated when it's a simple, but yet ILLOGICAL, hypothetical.

Hypothetical from merriam-webster: involving or based on a suggested idea or theory : involving or based on a hypothesis

Hypothesis: Is the explanation for something has occured

Thus based on the definition of hyptohetical/hypothesis (which along with theory is a word that gets abused alot), you scenario isnt one, because it would never happen.

And your right not every topic needs to be debated, yet you choose to start a threat that involved an asinine scenario that would never happen in order to draw parallels to Israels war with Hamas.

How about this for a hypothetical situation: A terroist organization much like Hamas sends 19 operatives to attack America, how would we react? OH WAIT! It already happened and we know how we would react if we were attacked! Another reason why there was no point in debating this stupid scenario.

Therefore, Israel HAS EVERY RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. Hence the point of my scenario. It had nothing to do with cartels firing rockets at our border towns. And that's why you're a retard for over-thinking the entire point of the thread.

I never overthought it. I just thought the whole point of this thread was stupid. Also, we wouldnt attack back. We would do the same thing we did after 9/11, demand the country that they reside in to turn them over, except in this case with Mexico being a major partner of ours, theyd play ball.

(08-08-2014 08:16 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 06:01 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 05:48 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  This comparison makes no sense. Why would these cartels send rockets into a country they sell their product too? It would be bad for business. Where as hamas feels its good for their 'business' to send rockets into isreael.

We can resolve that attempted deflection quite easily with a different and believable scenario.

We round up 20 million illegals and send them back to Mexico. The Mexican government can't handle them, and Mexico turns into anarchy. Into the resulting void steps al-Qaeda, and it's al-Qaeda instead of drug lords who are sending in the rockets.

Now what do you do?

Thats an even more absurd scenario. How could a radical islamic terroist group (which cant even control an islamic country anymore) take control over the 11th largest country population wise that over 90% christian thats on the other side of the world.

Theres no point in playing the what if game, when the scenario is a joke.

Al qaeda isnt taking over Mexico, and the cartels arent going to mess with their profits by picking a fight they know they cant win.

Who said anything about their taking control? They don't have to take control for this situation to occur. All that has to happen is for whoever is supposed to be in control to lose control. Come to think of it, in Mexico that is already dangerously close to being the case, even without shipping 20 million illegals back.

(08-08-2014 10:57 AM)No Bull Wrote:  We would then shoot at them with water cannons...maybe even smoke bombs... to get them away from there rocket launchers...

How dare you, sir. Have you no idea the drought our southern border is experiencing?

(08-08-2014 02:55 PM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 01:12 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 11:56 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:41 AM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 09:21 AM)ODUChm Wrote:  Im sorry Im crapping over your stupid scenario, that will never happen because its a completely stupid scenario, thus making it no point in relating it to an actual real word scenario.

If it's a completely stupid scenario why even respond? Son, there are topics that I'll agree with Fitbud and disagree with Okla, then there are topics where I'll agree with Okla and disagree with Fitbud... And every time I'll be respectful.

Open up a dictionary and find the definition to HYPOTHETICAL. The point of this is regarding Israel and how they respond to Hamas. For f*cks sake, even I said this was illogical and never going to happen.

Smoke a joint sometime. Not every topic needs be vehemently debated when it's a simple, but yet ILLOGICAL, hypothetical.

Hypothetical from merriam-webster: involving or based on a suggested idea or theory : involving or based on a hypothesis

Hypothesis: Is the explanation for something has occured

Thus based on the definition of hyptohetical/hypothesis (which along with theory is a word that gets abused alot), you scenario isnt one, because it would never happen.

And your right not every topic needs to be debated, yet you choose to start a threat that involved an asinine scenario that would never happen in order to draw parallels to Israels war with Hamas.

How about this for a hypothetical situation: A terroist organization much like Hamas sends 19 operatives to attack America, how would we react? OH WAIT! It already happened and we know how we would react if we were attacked! Another reason why there was no point in debating this stupid scenario.

Therefore, Israel HAS EVERY RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. Hence the point of my scenario. It had nothing to do with cartels firing rockets at our border towns. And that's why you're a retard for over-thinking the entire point of the thread.

I never overthought it. I just thought the whole point of this thread was stupid. Also, we wouldnt attack back. We would do the same thing we did after 9/11, demand the country that they reside in to turn them over, except in this case with Mexico being a major partner of ours, theyd play ball.

So you wasted time of your life on several occasions today to reply to a thread you deemed was stupid....

MORE POWER TO YOU.