(08-06-2014 03:13 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:06 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:00 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 02:52 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 02:47 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This is why most people just stop arguing with liberals. They just aren't wired the way most of us are.

You mean they can understand simple graphs? But I think most conservatives and libertarians can do that too. This is more of a personal failing on your part than an ideological one.
What, exactly, is being compared on the graphs?

So let's try one last time...and thus is not a rhetorical question.
What does the graph suggest that the premise does not?

The graphs explain why your complaint is nonsensical. If you understood what they said, you would realize that. I could tell you, but that would be like just giving a man a fish. I want to help you. I want to teach you to fish.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

yeah, blah blah when was legal pot made available to the public again?

Are you sure you aren't a pot head? Your memory certainly seems to be affected--that's already been addressed twice in this very thread.

So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

(08-06-2014 03:18 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:13 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:06 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:00 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 02:52 PM)jh Wrote:  You mean they can understand simple graphs? But I think most conservatives and libertarians can do that too. This is more of a personal failing on your part than an ideological one.
What, exactly, is being compared on the graphs?

So let's try one last time...and thus is not a rhetorical question.
What does the graph suggest that the premise does not?

The graphs explain why your complaint is nonsensical. If you understood what they said, you would realize that. I could tell you, but that would be like just giving a man a fish. I want to help you. I want to teach you to fish.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

yeah, blah blah when was legal pot made available to the public again?

Are you sure you aren't a pot head? Your memory certainly seems to be affected--that's already been addressed twice in this very thread.

So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

What are the first three words in the title of this thread?

(08-06-2014 03:23 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:18 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:13 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:06 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:00 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  So let's try one last time...and thus is not a rhetorical question.
What does the graph suggest that the premise does not?

The graphs explain why your complaint is nonsensical. If you understood what they said, you would realize that. I could tell you, but that would be like just giving a man a fish. I want to help you. I want to teach you to fish.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

yeah, blah blah when was legal pot made available to the public again?

Are you sure you aren't a pot head? Your memory certainly seems to be affected--that's already been addressed twice in this very thread.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

What are the first three words in the title of this thread?

Your problems with reading comprehension are well documented in this thread, but I would never be so condescending as to pretend that I thought you were completely incapable of reading at all.

Ok, that's not true, I would. But not right now. Right now I'm trying to help. What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

(08-06-2014 03:32 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:23 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:18 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:13 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:06 PM)jh Wrote:  The graphs explain why your complaint is nonsensical. If you understood what they said, you would realize that. I could tell you, but that would be like just giving a man a fish. I want to help you. I want to teach you to fish.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

yeah, blah blah when was legal pot made available to the public again?

Are you sure you aren't a pot head? Your memory certainly seems to be affected--that's already been addressed twice in this very thread.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

What are the first three words in the title of this thread?

Your problems with reading comprehension are well documented in this thread, but I would never be so condescending as to pretend that I thought you were completely incapable of reading at all.

Ok, that's not true, I would. But not right now. Right now I'm trying to help. What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yeah blah blah. What are the first three words in the title?

I have read studies that prove smoking pot for the everyday with a tolerance actually increases their driving abilities. Idk about spice though Dixie.

(08-06-2014 03:35 PM)WPDAWG08 Wrote:  I have read studies that prove smoking pot for the everyday with a tolerance actually increases their driving abilities. Idk about spice though Dixie.

That's correct. Also, this just in. Moderate meth use actually increases someone's IQ.

(08-06-2014 03:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:32 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:23 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:18 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:13 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  yeah, blah blah when was legal pot made available to the public again?

Are you sure you aren't a pot head? Your memory certainly seems to be affected--that's already been addressed twice in this very thread.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

What are the first three words in the title of this thread?

Your problems with reading comprehension are well documented in this thread, but I would never be so condescending as to pretend that I thought you were completely incapable of reading at all.
Ok, that's not true, I would. But not right now. Right now I'm trying to help. What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yeah blah blah. What are the first three words in the title?

Well this is fun. The difference between us is that I know what the first three words of the title are. Sadly, you still haven't figured out what the graphs are about.

What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

(08-06-2014 03:40 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:32 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:23 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:18 PM)jh Wrote:  Are you sure you aren't a pot head? Your memory certainly seems to be affected--that's already been addressed twice in this very thread.
So what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

What are the first three words in the title of this thread?

Your problems with reading comprehension are well documented in this thread, but I would never be so condescending as to pretend that I thought you were completely incapable of reading at all.
Ok, that's not true, I would. But not right now. Right now I'm trying to help. What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yeah blah blah. What are the first three words in the title?

Well this is fun. The difference between us is that I know what the first three words of the title are. Sadly, you still haven't figured out what the graphs are about.

What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yes I have. I am trying to get you to realize how ridiculous this story is....yet so effective at influencing the dumbed down audience it targets.

(08-06-2014 03:42 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:40 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:32 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:23 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  What are the first three words in the title of this thread?

Your problems with reading comprehension are well documented in this thread, but I would never be so condescending as to pretend that I thought you were completely incapable of reading at all.
Ok, that's not true, I would. But not right now. Right now I'm trying to help. What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yeah blah blah. What are the first three words in the title?

Well this is fun. The difference between us is that I know what the first three words of the title are. Sadly, you still haven't figured out what the graphs are about.
What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yes I have. I am trying to get you to realize how ridiculous this story is....yet so effective at influencing the dumbed down audience it targets.

No, you don't. The entire line of questioning we went through earlier revealed just how little you understood about the data being presented. I bet even the kids being taught Common Core math would have a better grasp of the data than you. But because you are unwilling to allow me to help you, even after I tried so hard, I guess there is nothing more to talk about.

Unless, of course, you can answer what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs. What can I say, I hate to give up on a person.

I am a much safer driver as a daily cannabis smoker than I was as a high schooler/early college. Some of that has to do with aging, but it's never made me a worse driver. I've done dumb things in a car while high, but I've been just as dumb in a car sober.

Anyway, Radley Balko is one of the best writers in our current time (read his old writings or Rise of Warrior Cop for proof). You aren't just calling out some two-bit blogger. This guy actually does research and knows his ****. You're coming up with arguments about the season and vacation patterns. More data needs to be taken, but this is the exact opposite of what critics claimed would happen.

(08-06-2014 03:52 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:42 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:40 PM)jh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:34 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:32 PM)jh Wrote:  Your problems with reading comprehension are well documented in this thread, but I would never be so condescending as to pretend that I thought you were completely incapable of reading at all.
Ok, that's not true, I would. But not right now. Right now I'm trying to help. What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yeah blah blah. What are the first three words in the title?

Well this is fun. The difference between us is that I know what the first three words of the title are. Sadly, you still haven't figured out what the graphs are about.
What, exactly, is being compared in the graphs?

Yes I have. I am trying to get you to realize how ridiculous this story is....yet so effective at influencing the dumbed down audience it targets.

No, you don't. The entire line of questioning we went through earlier revealed just how little you understood about the data being presented. I bet even the kids being taught Common Core math would have a better grasp of the data than you. But because you are unwilling to allow me to help you, even after I tried so hard, I guess there is nothing more to talk about.

Unless, of course, you can answer what, exactly, is being compared in the graphs. What can I say, I hate to give up on a person.

You do realize that your chaotic thought process is a common trait among pot users?

I know it's tough, but try to focus. Think about the title of this thread and when pot was actually available LEGALLY to the public in Colorado.

Okla, you are the anti-Johnny0. Different viewpoint, same tactics.

You were asked a question many times but deflected by answering with a question yourself. That's not being forthcoming. You are acting like those who you regularly trash by not giving your answer and trying to change the subject slightly. What you afraid of, man?

I'm not taking sides here because there is not enough data yet. Oh, and I live in CO. Don't believe all the hysteria you see, hear or read in the media from out of state sources regarding mj in CO.