109K people partake in an anti-America rally

Your statement is correct. Your tying it to soccer is false.

I wouldn't get too excited about a new venue in town filled with white liberals that would love to worship anything European.

(08-02-2014 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Your statement is correct. Your tying it to soccer is false.

I wouldn't get too excited about a new venue in town filled with white liberals that would love to worship anything European.

Doesn't matter what my statement is, the fact that you responded first (and very quickly I may add) proves the point I was making in this thread.....

(08-02-2014 07:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Your statement is correct. Your tying it to soccer is false.

I wouldn't get too excited about a new venue in town filled with white liberals that would love to worship anything European.

Doesn't matter what my statement is, the fact that you responded first (and very quickly I may add) proves the point I was making in this thread.....

actually, your statement is a fact, but it has nothing to do with this game.


Remember when you lost a gasket after I posted that last soccer thread?

...you only posted this because you saw that I was online. I get under your skin and you are constantly trying to vindicate yourself. Of course I was going to respond.

(08-02-2014 07:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Your statement is correct. Your tying it to soccer is false.

I wouldn't get too excited about a new venue in town filled with white liberals that would love to worship anything European.

Doesn't matter what my statement is, the fact that you responded first (and very quickly I may add) proves the point I was making in this thread.....

actually, your statement is a fact, but it has nothing to do with this game.


Remember when you lost a gasket after I posted that last soccer thread?

...you only posted this because you saw that I was online. I get under your skin and you are constantly trying to vindicate yourself. Of course I was going to respond.

No dude, I don't have to look if you are online because I KNOW you are online 95% of the time I am usually online.

considering the BS you pulled pming me hate message & immediately putting me on ignore, bumping threads from months ago just to piss me off, & your 3 day long meltdown over the history forum...

I think you lose all right to even talk about getting under my skin and making me resort to 6 year old tactics buddy

(08-02-2014 07:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

109K people partake in an anti-America rally

Nicely done.

The Detroit papers had an article on the match's outcome. And right on cue, here come the anti-soccer types in the Detroit papers' comments section.

There is no other sport that attracts this level of butthurt detractors. You tend to get a feel of the demographic of many of them: Middle-aged, pasty white, blue collar-ish, Ted Nugent-fan types who fear anything that hints of "furriners".

(08-02-2014 07:57 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Your statement is correct. Your tying it to soccer is false.

I wouldn't get too excited about a new venue in town filled with white liberals that would love to worship anything European.

Doesn't matter what my statement is, the fact that you responded first (and very quickly I may add) proves the point I was making in this thread.....

actually, your statement is a fact, but it has nothing to do with this game.


Remember when you lost a gasket after I posted that last soccer thread?

...you only posted this because you saw that I was online. I get under your skin and you are constantly trying to vindicate yourself. Of course I was going to respond.

No dude, I don't have to look if you are online because I KNOW you are online 95% of the time I am usually online.

considering the BS you pulled pming me hate message & immediately putting me on ignore, bumping threads from months ago just to piss me off, & your 3 day long meltdown over the history forum...

I think you lose all right to even talk about getting under my skin and making me resort to 6 year old tactics buddy

So John, there has been a question floating around about you. People want to know why you hide your online status. What are you afraid of?

(08-02-2014 07:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:57 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:44 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Your statement is correct. Your tying it to soccer is false.

I wouldn't get too excited about a new venue in town filled with white liberals that would love to worship anything European.

Doesn't matter what my statement is, the fact that you responded first (and very quickly I may add) proves the point I was making in this thread.....

actually, your statement is a fact, but it has nothing to do with this game.


Remember when you lost a gasket after I posted that last soccer thread?

...you only posted this because you saw that I was online. I get under your skin and you are constantly trying to vindicate yourself. Of course I was going to respond.

No dude, I don't have to look if you are online because I KNOW you are online 95% of the time I am usually online.

considering the BS you pulled pming me hate message & immediately putting me on ignore, bumping threads from months ago just to piss me off, & your 3 day long meltdown over the history forum...

I think you lose all right to even talk about getting under my skin and making me resort to 6 year old tactics buddy

So John, there has been a question floating around about you. People want to know why you hide your online status. What are you afraid of?

That question is not something that is "floating around" it is asked constantly by one person & only one person (you).

(08-02-2014 07:58 PM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:42 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

109K people partake in an anti-America rally

Nicely done.

The Detroit papers had an article on the match's outcome. And right on cue, here come the anti-soccer types in the Detroit papers' comments section.

There is no other sport that attracts this level of butthurt detractors. You tend to get a feel of the demographic of many of them: Middle-aged, pasty white, blue collar-ish, Ted Nugent-fan types who fear anything that hints of "furriners".

It's a good thing the match didn't end in a tie ==> I can only imagine how big the butthurt would be over that.

(08-02-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:57 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Doesn't matter what my statement is, the fact that you responded first (and very quickly I may add) proves the point I was making in this thread.....

actually, your statement is a fact, but it has nothing to do with this game.


Remember when you lost a gasket after I posted that last soccer thread?

...you only posted this because you saw that I was online. I get under your skin and you are constantly trying to vindicate yourself. Of course I was going to respond.

No dude, I don't have to look if you are online because I KNOW you are online 95% of the time I am usually online.

considering the BS you pulled pming me hate message & immediately putting me on ignore, bumping threads from months ago just to piss me off, & your 3 day long meltdown over the history forum...

I think you lose all right to even talk about getting under my skin and making me resort to 6 year old tactics buddy

So John, there has been a question floating around about you. People want to know why you hide your online status. What are you afraid of?

That question is not something that is "floating around" it is asked constantly by one person & only one person (you).

No, it's been brought up several times since your epic meltdown the other day.

(08-02-2014 08:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:57 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:49 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  actually, your statement is a fact, but it has nothing to do with this game.


Remember when you lost a gasket after I posted that last soccer thread?

...you only posted this because you saw that I was online. I get under your skin and you are constantly trying to vindicate yourself. Of course I was going to respond.

No dude, I don't have to look if you are online because I KNOW you are online 95% of the time I am usually online.

considering the BS you pulled pming me hate message & immediately putting me on ignore, bumping threads from months ago just to piss me off, & your 3 day long meltdown over the history forum...

I think you lose all right to even talk about getting under my skin and making me resort to 6 year old tactics buddy

So John, there has been a question floating around about you. People want to know why you hide your online status. What are you afraid of?

That question is not something that is "floating around" it is asked constantly by one person & only one person (you).

No, it's been brought up several times since your epic meltdown the other day.

No other person has ever directly asked me that question other than you.

(08-02-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:57 PM)john01992 Wrote:  No dude, I don't have to look if you are online because I KNOW you are online 95% of the time I am usually online.

considering the BS you pulled pming me hate message & immediately putting me on ignore, bumping threads from months ago just to piss me off, & your 3 day long meltdown over the history forum...

I think you lose all right to even talk about getting under my skin and making me resort to 6 year old tactics buddy

So John, there has been a question floating around about you. People want to know why you hide your online status. What are you afraid of?

That question is not something that is "floating around" it is asked constantly by one person & only one person (you).

No, it's been brought up several times since your epic meltdown the other day.

No other person has ever directly asked me that question other than you.

Because they don't know you like I do. It's simple question John. Why do you hide? Is it because you melted down or do you just feel more protected when you can remain hidden?

(08-02-2014 08:33 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 07:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  So John, there has been a question floating around about you. People want to know why you hide your online status. What are you afraid of?

That question is not something that is "floating around" it is asked constantly by one person & only one person (you).

No, it's been brought up several times since your epic meltdown the other day.

No other person has ever directly asked me that question other than you.

Because they don't know you like I do. It's simple question John. Why do you hide? Is it because you melted down or do you just feel more protected when you can remain hidden?

I think you are going

(08-02-2014 08:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:33 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  That question is not something that is "floating around" it is asked constantly by one person & only one person (you).

No, it's been brought up several times since your epic meltdown the other day.

No other person has ever directly asked me that question other than you.

Because they don't know you like I do. It's simple question John. Why do you hide? Is it because you melted down or do you just feel more protected when you can remain hidden?

I think you are going

where am I going?

(08-02-2014 08:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:33 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  No, it's been brought up several times since your epic meltdown the other day.

No other person has ever directly asked me that question other than you.

Because they don't know you like I do. It's simple question John. Why do you hide? Is it because you melted down or do you just feel more protected when you can remain hidden?

I think you are going

where am I going?

You don't see me or anyone else on CSNBBS ragging on other posters for something as trivial as hiding online status.

(08-02-2014 08:52 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:33 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  No other person has ever directly asked me that question other than you.

Because they don't know you like I do. It's simple question John. Why do you hide? Is it because you melted down or do you just feel more protected when you can remain hidden?

I think you are going

where am I going?

You don't see me or anyone else on CSNBBS ragging on other posters for something as trivial as hiding online status.

People just want to know. No reason to get mad about it.

(08-02-2014 09:17 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:52 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:33 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Because they don't know you like I do. It's simple question John. Why do you hide? Is it because you melted down or do you just feel more protected when you can remain hidden?

I think you are going

where am I going?

You don't see me or anyone else on CSNBBS ragging on other posters for something as trivial as hiding online status.

I just want to know. No reason to get mad about it.

FIFY

(08-02-2014 09:20 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 09:17 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:52 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-02-2014 08:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  I think you are going

where am I going?

You don't see me or anyone else on CSNBBS ragging on other posters for something as trivial as hiding online status.

I just want to know. No reason to get mad about it.

FIFY

People have been a little concerned with your well being John.

Was it John0 or someone else that advocated child porn in the prostitution thread?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Aside from okie, I'm probably the most conservative MF'er on this board. And I love soccer.

I don't get this whole argument.