(08-01-2014 12:14 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:10 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:17 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:09 AM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:06 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Name calling may work in rallying internet comment trolls, but it won't get you votes.

I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game. I don't think the Spin Room is a hot spot for garnering votes. You have to admit that Ted is a little effeminate and narcissism is a chronic political disease.

What are you talking about?

Cruz is prissy. Cruz is self-centered. Cruz is egotistical. Cruz is calculating. A lot of politicians are self-centered and egotistical.

Cruz is not prissy, you are an idiot. If he was self centered, he be lining his pockets with lobbyist cash and prepping himself for a K Street career (Cantor), not going against the establishment. He is the polar opposite of self-centered. Egotistical and calculating? Maybe, but who gets to that level without an ego and making calculated moves?

(nice name calling) I certainly hope he is the GOP nominee in 2016.

(08-01-2014 12:38 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:14 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:10 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:17 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:09 AM)dawgitall Wrote:  I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game. I don't think the Spin Room is a hot spot for garnering votes. You have to admit that Ted is a little effeminate and narcissism is a chronic political disease.

What are you talking about?

Cruz is prissy. Cruz is self-centered. Cruz is egotistical. Cruz is calculating. A lot of politicians are self-centered and egotistical.

Cruz is not prissy, you are an idiot. If he was self centered, he be lining his pockets with lobbyist cash and prepping himself for a K Street career (Cantor), not going against the establishment. He is the polar opposite of self-centered. Egotistical and calculating? Maybe, but who gets to that level without an ego and making calculated moves?

(nice name calling) I certainly hope he is the GOP nominee in 2016.

Actually a lot of people do. About time we had someone that sticks up for what's right instead of politically correct or convenient.

I see that dawgitall is rooting for Hilary.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(08-01-2014 12:10 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:17 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:09 AM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:06 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 09:58 AM)dawgitall Wrote:  I find the metrosexual narcissist Ted Cruz funny.

Name calling may work in rallying internet comment trolls, but it won't get you votes.

I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game. I don't think the Spin Room is a hot spot for garnering votes. You have to admit that Ted is a little effeminate and narcissism is a chronic political disease.

What are you talking about?

Cruz is prissy. Cruz is self-centered. Cruz is egotistical. Cruz is calculating. A lot of politicians are self-centered and egotistical.

Sounds like you have a little crush on him.

(08-01-2014 03:47 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:10 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:17 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:09 AM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:06 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Name calling may work in rallying internet comment trolls, but it won't get you votes.

I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game. I don't think the Spin Room is a hot spot for garnering votes. You have to admit that Ted is a little effeminate and narcissism is a chronic political disease.

What are you talking about?

Cruz is prissy. Cruz is self-centered. Cruz is egotistical. Cruz is calculating. A lot of politicians are self-centered and egotistical.

Sounds like you have a little crush on him.

Get Cruz's nuts out of your mouth brah.

(08-01-2014 03:51 PM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 03:47 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:10 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:17 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 10:09 AM)dawgitall Wrote:  I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game. I don't think the Spin Room is a hot spot for garnering votes. You have to admit that Ted is a little effeminate and narcissism is a chronic political disease.

What are you talking about?

Cruz is prissy. Cruz is self-centered. Cruz is egotistical. Cruz is calculating. A lot of politicians are self-centered and egotistical.

Sounds like you have a little crush on him.

Get Cruz's nuts out of your mouth brah.

Take Obama's rod out of your backside, brah.

You guys are just plain weird.

(08-01-2014 12:42 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  I see that dawgitall is rooting for Hilary.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

I don't know if that would be entirely correct. I'll support the Democratic nominee when all is said and done, so if it is Clinton that would be a yes. But I'd like to keep the options open right now. I'm not crazy about family dynasties like the Clintons and Bushes occupying the White House for years and years.

(08-01-2014 06:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:42 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  I see that dawgitall is rooting for Hilary.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

I don't know if that would be entirely correct. I'll support the Democratic nominee when all is said and done, so if it is Clinton that would be a yes. But I'd like to keep the options open right now. I'm not crazy about family dynasties like the Clintons and Bushes occupying the White House for years and years.

But you'll support the dim no matter who's name is on there. Wow. Talk about closed minded.

Yet it's the conservatives who get lectured over and over again about being "open-minded", when we all know that means nothing more than "why aren't you more liberal"? When clearly it's the libs that are closed minded to anyone or anything that may be conservative in nature. And we wonder why nothing can get done in that cesspool of Dee Cee.

I don't really like Cruz but I'll take him over Boehner. John is the single most incompetent SOB in Washington. The fact he hasn't been replaced 1000 times already shows how incompetent the entire party has become.

(08-01-2014 06:19 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:42 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  I see that dawgitall is rooting for Hilary.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

I don't know if that would be entirely correct. I'll support the Democratic nominee when all is said and done, so if it is Clinton that would be a yes. But I'd like to keep the options open right now. I'm not crazy about family dynasties like the Clintons and Bushes occupying the White House for years and years.

But you'll support the dim no matter who's name is on there. Wow. Talk about closed minded.

Yet it's the conservatives who get lectured over and over again about being "open-minded", when we all know that means nothing more than "why aren't you more liberal"? When clearly it's the libs that are closed minded to anyone or anything that may be conservative in nature. And we wonder why nothing can get done in that cesspool of Dee Cee.

If you haven't noticed I am a card carrying Democrat. I'm open minded about who the nominee might be but when all is said and done it is time to circle the wagons. I think it is much better to work within the system rather than get mad when things don't go the way I want and stand outside and yell.

(08-01-2014 06:28 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:19 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:42 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  I see that dawgitall is rooting for Hilary.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

I don't know if that would be entirely correct. I'll support the Democratic nominee when all is said and done, so if it is Clinton that would be a yes. But I'd like to keep the options open right now. I'm not crazy about family dynasties like the Clintons and Bushes occupying the White House for years and years.

But you'll support the dim no matter who's name is on there. Wow. Talk about closed minded.

Yet it's the conservatives who get lectured over and over again about being "open-minded", when we all know that means nothing more than "why aren't you more liberal"? When clearly it's the libs that are closed minded to anyone or anything that may be conservative in nature. And we wonder why nothing can get done in that cesspool of Dee Cee.

If you haven't noticed I am a card carrying Democrat. I'm open minded about who the nominee might be but when all is said and done it is time to circle the wagons. I think it is much better to work within the system rather than get mad when things don't go the way I want and stand outside and yell.

We'll see if you can practice what you preach when the Democrats take a beating in November.

(08-01-2014 06:28 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:19 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:42 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  I see that dawgitall is rooting for Hilary.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

I don't know if that would be entirely correct. I'll support the Democratic nominee when all is said and done, so if it is Clinton that would be a yes. But I'd like to keep the options open right now. I'm not crazy about family dynasties like the Clintons and Bushes occupying the White House for years and years.

But you'll support the dim no matter who's name is on there. Wow. Talk about closed minded.

Yet it's the conservatives who get lectured over and over again about being "open-minded", when we all know that means nothing more than "why aren't you more liberal"? When clearly it's the libs that are closed minded to anyone or anything that may be conservative in nature. And we wonder why nothing can get done in that cesspool of Dee Cee.

If you haven't noticed I am a card carrying Democrat. I'm open minded about who the nominee might be but when all is said and done it is time to circle the wagons. I think it is much better to work within the system rather than get mad when things don't go the way I want and stand outside and yell.

Yet, you'd never vote for a Republican or independent. Amazing.

No wonder we get the government we deserve. You're one of those that would vote for an idiot like a Sheila Jackson Lee over someone sane and competent, simply because of the "D". A yellow dog.

You're yet another who contributes to the problem, complains about the problem, yet is part of the problem and doesn't even realize or won't recognize it.

Talk about close minded.

I find the metrosexual narcissist Ted Cruz funny.
[/quote]

Name calling may work in rallying internet comment trolls, but it won't get you votes.
[/quote]
I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game. I don't think the Spin Room is a hot spot for garnering votes. You have to admit that Ted is a little effeminate and narcissism is a chronic political disease.
[/quote]


What do you have against gays?


Sic 'em Tommy!

Cruz does have a bit of a 'feminine' thing about him.

(08-01-2014 06:50 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  I find the metrosexual narcissist Ted Cruz funny.

Name calling may work in rallying internet comment trolls, but it won't get you votes.
[/quote]
I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game. I don't think the Spin Room is a hot spot for garnering votes. You have to admit that Ted is a little effeminate and narcissism is a chronic political disease.
[/quote]


What do you have against gays?


Sic 'em Tommy!
[/quote]

I could care less about his sexual orientation. Being effeminate or a metrosexual aren't about that. They are some of is quirks.

(08-01-2014 06:57 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  I never call any of my fellow posters names. On the other hand public officials are far game.

I think that's a reasonable approach.

(08-01-2014 06:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:28 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:19 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 12:42 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  I see that dawgitall is rooting for Hilary.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

I don't know if that would be entirely correct. I'll support the Democratic nominee when all is said and done, so if it is Clinton that would be a yes. But I'd like to keep the options open right now. I'm not crazy about family dynasties like the Clintons and Bushes occupying the White House for years and years.

But you'll support the dim no matter who's name is on there. Wow. Talk about closed minded.

Yet it's the conservatives who get lectured over and over again about being "open-minded", when we all know that means nothing more than "why aren't you more liberal"? When clearly it's the libs that are closed minded to anyone or anything that may be conservative in nature. And we wonder why nothing can get done in that cesspool of Dee Cee.

If you haven't noticed I am a card carrying Democrat. I'm open minded about who the nominee might be but when all is said and done it is time to circle the wagons. I think it is much better to work within the system rather than get mad when things don't go the way I want and stand outside and yell.

Yet, you'd never vote for a Republican or independent. Amazing.

No wonder we get the government we deserve. You're one of those that would vote for an idiot like a Sheila Jackson Lee over someone sane and competent, simply because of the "D". A yellow dog.

You're yet another who contributes to the problem, complains about the problem, yet is part of the problem and doesn't even realize or won't recognize it.

Talk about close minded.

Actually I voted for a Republican once. He is a friend of mine and I knew he didn't have a chance of winning. So I gave him my vote. Otherwise why would anyone vote for a candidate from a party that more often than not supports positions that are the polar opposite of your position? I have plenty of opportunity to eliminate the outliers during the primary season. If a loony gets through that process I simply don't vote for them, but this seldom happens. While you are entitled to your opinion I think you are off base in your assessment.

if you are a conservative would you honestly vote for someone you considered a liberal?

(08-01-2014 06:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I don't really like Cruz but I'll take him over Boehner. John is the single most incompetent SOB in Washington. The fact he hasn't been replaced 1000 times already shows how incompetent the entire party has become.

Agree.

(08-01-2014 07:54 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:43 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:28 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:19 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 06:07 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  I don't know if that would be entirely correct. I'll support the Democratic nominee when all is said and done, so if it is Clinton that would be a yes. But I'd like to keep the options open right now. I'm not crazy about family dynasties like the Clintons and Bushes occupying the White House for years and years.

But you'll support the dim no matter who's name is on there. Wow. Talk about closed minded.

Yet it's the conservatives who get lectured over and over again about being "open-minded", when we all know that means nothing more than "why aren't you more liberal"? When clearly it's the libs that are closed minded to anyone or anything that may be conservative in nature. And we wonder why nothing can get done in that cesspool of Dee Cee.

If you haven't noticed I am a card carrying Democrat. I'm open minded about who the nominee might be but when all is said and done it is time to circle the wagons. I think it is much better to work within the system rather than get mad when things don't go the way I want and stand outside and yell.

Yet, you'd never vote for a Republican or independent. Amazing.

No wonder we get the government we deserve. You're one of those that would vote for an idiot like a Sheila Jackson Lee over someone sane and competent, simply because of the "D". A yellow dog.

You're yet another who contributes to the problem, complains about the problem, yet is part of the problem and doesn't even realize or won't recognize it.

Talk about close minded.

Actually I voted for a Republican once. He is a friend of mine and I knew he didn't have a chance of winning. So I gave him my vote. Otherwise why would anyone vote for a candidate from a party that more often than not supports positions that are the polar opposite of your position? I have plenty of opportunity to eliminate the outliers during the primary season. If a loony gets through that process I simply don't vote for them, but this seldom happens. While you are entitled to your opinion I think you are off base in your assessment.

if you are a conservative would you honestly vote for someone you considered a liberal?

A liberal? Perhaps not, but that would depend on the other candidate. But that's not what we're talking about here, is it? Again, you leftists move the Gooooooaal!!!!. I said yella dawg, any dim, all the time, so long as they's dim's. Right?

Would I vote for a democrat? Yup. Done it, it was the right decision and he was a hell of a good Pol. Served his constituents well. Was he liberal, well of course not silly, who would vote for that stupidity?