Quote:While many people are awakening to the Obama ADMINISTRATION and their attempts to undermine our national sovereignty, it must be stated that this has been an ongoing effort for many, many decades. Barrack Obama is merely a tool selected to get an already conditioned population to accept the final stages of a plan that will see the United States surrender its sovereignty and merge into a global governing structure where she will no longer be respected as a world super power, but viewed merely as another third world nation that is morally equivalent to all others. There are three main pillars of our society and culture that need to be changed from the inside in order for this transformation to take place; immigration, education and the military. It is hard to argue, even for those who adamantly oppose any idea of conspiracy theories, that these three elements of our SOCIETY have not been radically affected in recent years. This article will offer a brief analysis into the events taking place and the historical roots behind them. This is indeed a planned collapse, and to be calling it out for what it is now is INDEED too little too late.

As the crisis along our border escalates, we are hearing more and more on the whole situation being a planned event to precipitate the total collapse of our nation. Even congressmen are coming out and calling this a deliberate APPLICATION of the Cloward & Piven strategy. For those who may not know, the Cloward & Piven strategy was the work of two Sociology Professors at Columbia University, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, designed to organize the nation’s poor and minorities into a power base from which the country, through the democratic process, could be converted into a socialist state. One of the key components of this strategy was the idea of overwhelming the nation’s WELFARE system to the point where it collapses, and the government would then be forced to adapt socialism.

It’s obvious beyond any doubt that Barrack Hussein Obama is implementing this strategy; after all he did attend Columbia University and was likely educated by Frances Fox Piven. In my article, “President Obama, Frances Fox Piven, and voter registration schemes” I discussed Piven and her efforts to organize a voter registration drive aimed at minorities by teaching them they were oppressed. I also mentioned one of my own professors, an admitted socialist mind you, who was likely educated by Piven as he had attended The Columbia University SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK. In short, people who are calling the border crisis a deliberate attempt to undermine America and collapse her financial system are correct; however, from the perspective of a writer who has been trying to bring many things to people’s attention, they are a day late and a dollar short as this is only one small aspect of many moving parts put in motion a long time ago.

http://www.teapartycrusaders.com/u-s-pol...es-making/

I've known all along that Obama was just part of a calculated plan to take us down. Those who continue to say stuff like "Obama is failing" or "Obama is incompetent" don't fully understand what is happening.

The reason that nothing gets done about our problems is because the Obama administration doesn't want anything done about our problems. They have been deliberately caused.

Frances Fox Piven teaches at CUNY, not Columbia. But that's not the biggest lie in the article.

(07-30-2014 12:30 PM)TPBlaze84 Wrote:  Frances Fox Piven teaches at CUNY, not Columbia. But that's not the biggest lie in the article.

You need to read the article again. Previous to her current position, Piven has taught at Boston University, Columbia University, New York University Law School, the Institute of Advanced Studies in Vienna, the University of Amsterdam, and the University of Bologna.

We do not know the age of this author.

Nice try.

Piven has taught at CUNY since 1982.

Nice try

(07-30-2014 12:42 PM)TPBlaze84 Wrote:  Piven has taught at CUNY since 1982.

Nice try

Your point?

She never taught a class for the president. Minor point, I know. But it's symptomatic of the rest of the nonsense that makes up that article

(07-30-2014 12:50 PM)TPBlaze84 Wrote:  She never taught a class for the president. Minor point, I know. But it's symptomatic of the rest of the nonsense that makes up that article

Give it up. The article is factual and most likely pointing to Obama's blueprint.

Now I know you can do better than that. I have to compliment you man, only a pretty damn intelligent person could be this consistent and effective of a troll.

Obama is a socialist and arrived at Occidental at 18 as an admitted Marxist. Of course the radical left
wants as many people on the government nipple as possible.

Was it Piven’s class that cheered when Reagan was shot?


Edit: I just did a web search, it was Professor Fuke’s class at Columbia University that cheered.

(07-30-2014 01:07 PM)AngryAphid Wrote:  Was it Piven’s class that cheered when Reagan was shot?


Edit: I just did a web search, it was Professor Fuke’s class at Columbia University that cheered.

I'm betting it was. It probably happened at many radical left wing institutions.

Here's one from Berkley.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/...gan-was-sh

EverRespect so when are you going to pack your bags?

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(07-30-2014 01:36 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  EverRespect so when are you going to pack your bags?

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Huh? I haven't commented even on this thread.

(07-30-2014 12:54 PM)TPBlaze84 Wrote:  Now I know you can do better than that. I have to compliment you man, only a pretty damn intelligent person could be this consistent and effective of a troll.

Go on liberal. Keep trying to cover for your error.

Now enlighten us with your wisdom. Outline how this article is wrong.

(07-30-2014 12:50 PM)TPBlaze84 Wrote:  She never taught a class for the president. Minor point, I know.

The article doesn't say that she did. Dances around it, I know, but never actually says it. And if your argument is that she was at CCNY while he was across town at Columbia, and given what we know about his admitted fondness for Marxist professors because they were "cool" (his word, I believe), I'd say the odds lean toward the idea that he probably found a way to hear her speak on one if not many occasions. And that's pretty much all the article suggests.

Quote:But it's symptomatic of the rest of the nonsense that makes up that article

I'm not really that fond of the article. I find too many people pushing conspiracy theories through articles like this. But I wouldn't classify it as nonsense. Perhaps you can elaborate as to what you find nonsensical.

(07-30-2014 01:42 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 01:36 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  EverRespect so when are you going to pack your bags?

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Huh? I haven't commented even on this thread.

You made the thread.

(07-30-2014 02:12 PM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 01:42 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 01:36 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  EverRespect so when are you going to pack your bags?

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Huh? I haven't commented even on this thread.

You made the thread.

I posted the article for discussion. I have yet to comment on the article.

(07-30-2014 02:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 12:50 PM)TPBlaze84 Wrote:  She never taught a class for the president. Minor point, I know.

The article doesn't say that she did. Dances around it, I know, but never actually says it. And if your argument is that she was at CCNY while he was across town at Columbia, and given what we know about his admitted fondness for Marxist professors because they were "cool" (his word, I believe), I'd say the odds lean toward the idea that he probably found a way to hear her speak on one if not many occasions. And that's pretty much all the article suggests.

Quote:But it's symptomatic of the rest of the nonsense that makes up that article

I'm not really that fond of the article. I find too many people pushing conspiracy theories through articles like this. But I wouldn't classify it as nonsense. Perhaps you can elaborate as to what you find nonsensical.

You're certainly right, wouldn't be surprised either if he found his way into meeting her or listening to a lecture. I was just pointing out how the article is trying infer something that it has no clear evidence it happened. That kind of technique is present throughout the whole thing.

And the conspiracy theory that is being pushed is exactly what I find nonsensical. People have been raving about socialist conspiracies to ruin America's culture and foster its collapse and eventual assimilation into a world government for decades. In the 1960s, many claimed that integration efforts represented part of a conspiracy to do this. It's utterly without foundation

OWL and TPBLAZE

Gentlemen:

From the article

Quote: the Cloward & Piven strategy was the work of two Sociology Professors at Columbia University, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, designed to organize the nation’s poor and minorities into a power base from which the country, through the democratic process, could be converted into a socialist state. One of the key components of this strategy was the idea of overwhelming the nation’s WELFARE system to the point where it collapses, and the government would then be forced to adapt socialism.

The Cloward Piven Strategy

Quote:The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty". Cloward and Piven were a married couple who were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal[1] magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"

Let's pull it together guys.