(07-28-2014 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 09:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:58 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:39 AM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  I'd vote Gary Johnson if I had a do-over.

I did, and I don't regret it.

Me, three.

Thanks.

Signed,
Barack

Not according to this article about Nevada:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/...ada-1.html

Quote:When Gary Johnson's included he gets 3% and actually takes mostly from Obama, pulling his lead over Romney down to 48/47. That could be something worth keeping an eye on.

I voted for Gary Johnson and would do so again if I were voting again.

It's telling that Tom, JD, and other koolaid drinkers don't dispute Obama's laundry list of incredible failures but simply say Romney would have been just as horrendous. Laughable considering Romney's vastly superior qualifications, earned in the crucible of business, state governor, and chairman of the first Olympics post 9-11.

(07-28-2014 10:18 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 10:17 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 09:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:58 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I did, and I don't regret it.

Me, three.

Thanks.

Signed,
Barack

My vote for Johnson didn't throw Alabama to Obama.

So if you lived in a swing state, how would you have voted?

I live in a swing state, and I would have voted Johnson if given another chance.

(07-28-2014 11:30 AM)boss man Wrote:  It's telling that Tom, JD, and other koolaid drinkers don't dispute Obama's laundry list of incredible failures but simply say Romney would have been just as horrendous. Laughable considering Romney's vastly superior qualifications, earned in the crucible of business, state governor, and chairman of the first Olympics post 9-11.

First, yes I do dispute this 'laundry list' and have done so on many occasions. That being said, sure Obama has made mistakes. They all do, He's not perfect and I never claimed him to be...that was your guys meme, not mine.

Second, I never said that Romney would have been just as horrendous. I think he would have been bad for the country as we would have cut taxes and gutted the social safety nets all the while bloating the industrial military complex and continuing our Iraq/Afghanistan policy just like Obama did.

And finally, I do dispute this so-called 'superior qualifications' you claim Romney had. There is no test to determine how great a president would/will be. There have been great senators who have made lousy presidents and vice-versa. Same thing with governors. And Romney's business 'successes' were in a highly specialized field where he used some special tactics to make money. But yeah...he was fairly decent with the Olympics. But big whoop.

(07-28-2014 11:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But yeah...he was fairly decent with the Olympics. But big whoop.

Compared to the accomplishments of pre-President Obama?

Yeah, the whoop is pretty big.

(07-28-2014 12:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 11:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But yeah...he was fairly decent with the Olympics. But big whoop.

Compared to the accomplishments of pre-President Obama?

Yeah, the whoop is pretty big.

bull****. He was basically just a big fundraiser.

(07-28-2014 12:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 12:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 11:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But yeah...he was fairly decent with the Olympics. But big whoop.

Compared to the accomplishments of pre-President Obama?

Yeah, the whoop is pretty big.

bull****. He was basically just a big fundraiser.

Wait. Are we talking about Romney or Obama?

(07-28-2014 12:09 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 12:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 12:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 11:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But yeah...he was fairly decent with the Olympics. But big whoop.

Compared to the accomplishments of pre-President Obama?

Yeah, the whoop is pretty big.

bull****. He was basically just a big fundraiser.

Wait. Are we talking about Romney or Obama?

You tell me...go look at the article I posted about his great accomplishments as Governor. It could be a story about Obama as a senator.

44% of voters should lose their right to vote.

Easy to say given the fact that roomney has done nothing in the past two years.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(07-27-2014 10:05 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Too little too late. Not to mention. Too stupid. That's most Americans now a days.

(07-28-2014 12:22 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  44% of voters should lose their right to vote.

You're serious, aren't you?

(07-28-2014 03:40 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 12:22 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  44% of voters should lose their right to vote.

You're serious, aren't you?

Whatever he needs to get his party elected. Lord knows they can't do it on principle or ideas.

I get confused between redwingtom and lazy tom. I know one of those tom cats doesn't like obama and didn't vote for him. If it's redwing then how come he's defending that loser?

(07-28-2014 12:23 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Easy to say given the fact that roomney has done nothing in the past two years.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Even easier when zerO hasn't done much of anything for the past 6.

(07-28-2014 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 09:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:58 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:39 AM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  I'd vote Gary Johnson if I had a do-over.

I did, and I don't regret it.

Me, three.

Thanks.

Signed,
Barack

This. Unfortunately. I sincerely wish third-party supporters would contemplate the consequences of their decision. IMO, supporting and voting for a third-party candidate that you know has no chance of winning the election is the same as Obama voting 'present'. It's an affirmation of the status quo. Sometimes the best choice is the lesser of two evils and a third-party candidate just gives people an out. Even if you don't live in a swing state, voting third party is as good as not voting. Support the candidate that best supports your views who has a legitimate shot at winning.

(07-29-2014 09:13 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 09:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:58 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:39 AM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  I'd vote Gary Johnson if I had a do-over.

I did, and I don't regret it.

Me, three.

Thanks.

Signed,
Barack

This. Unfortunately. I sincerely wish third-party supporters would contemplate the consequences of their decision. IMO, supporting and voting for a third-party candidate that you know has no chance of winning the election is the same as Obama voting 'present'. It's an affirmation of the status quo. Sometimes the best choice is the lesser of two evils and a third-party candidate just gives people an out. Even if you don't live in a swing state, voting third party is as good as not voting. Support the candidate that best supports your views who has a legitimate shot at winning.

Perot gave us Slick Willy. Then Slick Willy gave us NAFTA. The beginning of the end.

(07-28-2014 09:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:58 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 08:39 AM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  I'd vote Gary Johnson if I had a do-over.

I did, and I don't regret it.

Me, three.

Me, four.