(08-04-2014 04:24 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  Reasonable smack talk

Oxymoron

(08-05-2014 08:57 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(08-04-2014 04:24 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  Reasonable smack talk

Oxymoron

Leave it to a rice grad to require an in depth explanation. Reasonable Smack: lighthearted banter between opposing fans that includes jovial insults that are not personal in nature

(08-05-2014 09:48 AM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(08-05-2014 08:57 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(08-04-2014 04:24 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  Reasonable smack talk

Oxymoron

Leave it to a rice grad to require an in depth explanation. Reasonable Smack: lighthearted banter between opposing fans that includes jovial insults that are not personal in nature

Isn't that what I just did?

(08-05-2014 10:43 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(08-05-2014 09:48 AM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(08-05-2014 08:57 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(08-04-2014 04:24 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  Reasonable smack talk

Oxymoron

Leave it to a rice grad to require an in depth explanation. Reasonable Smack: lighthearted banter between opposing fans that includes jovial insults that are not personal in nature

Isn't that what I just did?

point granted. reluctantly but granted

(08-01-2014 03:48 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 08:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  I'm a fan of UH... but USM was just much, much better in 2011. USM was bigger, faster, and smarter at every position, and it was painfully obvious when the two teams played. UH had absolutely nothing for USM that day. Remember, it was 49-21 when we pulled our starters.

UAB 34 MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN 31

That game killed us in so many ways


SMTTT

(08-05-2014 06:15 PM)Jayesseagle Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 03:48 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 08:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  I'm a fan of UH... but USM was just much, much better in 2011. USM was bigger, faster, and smarter at every position, and it was painfully obvious when the two teams played. UH had absolutely nothing for USM that day. Remember, it was 49-21 when we pulled our starters.

UAB 34 MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN 31

That game killed us in so many ways


SMTTT

if we can keep our new coach you guys are going to hate us

We are about 1 season away from being badass again. In my opinion.

(08-05-2014 09:26 PM)Noodles Wrote:  We are about 1 season away from being badass again. In my opinion.

I think uab will be in the hunt for the west in 2016. I also think the west is going to be a lot harder to win than the east foe some time

(08-06-2014 02:13 AM)bladhmadh Wrote:  I think uab will be in the hunt for the west in 2016. I also think the west is going to be a lot harder to win than the east foe some time

Not so fast, my friend. I've wondered about long term competitiveness of both conferences and think both are, long term, going to be very competitive.

In the East, it's easy to see Marshall, Western Kentucky, Middle Tennessee and ODU being very competitive with each other in football for the long haul. I also think Charlotte, FAU and FIU can develop fairly rapidly given the right coaches and circumstances.

In the West, it's also easy to see UTSA, LaTech, North Texas, USM and Rice being long term competitive with each other. UTEP and UAB also have long term potential if they can get a few breaks.

Both divisions are going to be tough, most every year, I think, with neither being more than the other. Just my opinion.

(08-01-2014 03:48 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 08:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  I'm a fan of UH... but USM was just much, much better in 2011. USM was bigger, faster, and smarter at every position, and it was painfully obvious when the two teams played. UH had absolutely nothing for USM that day. Remember, it was 49-21 when we pulled our starters.

UAB 34 MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN 31

UAB.. Don't that stand for University of Alabama's B*tch?

(08-06-2014 09:35 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 03:48 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 08:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  I'm a fan of UH... but USM was just much, much better in 2011. USM was bigger, faster, and smarter at every position, and it was painfully obvious when the two teams played. UH had absolutely nothing for USM that day. Remember, it was 49-21 when we pulled our starters.

UAB 34 MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN 31

UAB.. Don't that stand for University of Alabama's B*tch?

We have a winning record against them in basketball, over the past 5 years are 6-4 in baseball, and they won't play us in football. If that's your definition of ***** then yes

(08-06-2014 03:19 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 09:35 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-01-2014 03:48 PM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 08:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  I'm a fan of UH... but USM was just much, much better in 2011. USM was bigger, faster, and smarter at every position, and it was painfully obvious when the two teams played. UH had absolutely nothing for USM that day. Remember, it was 49-21 when we pulled our starters.

UAB 34 MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN 31

UAB.. Don't that stand for University of Alabama's B*tch?

We have a winning record against them in basketball, over the past 5 years are 6-4 in baseball, and they won't play us in football. If that's your definition of ***** then yes

I'm not defending their refusal to play UAB, but you don't take that as a mean of saying they're afraid to play UAB for fear of losing, do you?

I'm meaning it as UAB can't do anything without UA's approval.

(08-06-2014 03:25 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I'm meaning it as UAB can't do anything without UA's approval.

I knew what you intended. You USM guys just are not used to smack banter

(08-07-2014 06:48 AM)bladhmadh Wrote:  

(08-06-2014 03:25 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I'm meaning it as UAB can't do anything without UA's approval.

I knew what you intended. You USM guys just are not used to smack banter

I was never good at it.. You find smack threads I've participated in.. My best line was "The jerk store called..."