It's truly amazing how many liberals don't know the meaning of the word "hate". When did they stop teaching vocabulary in school?

(07-23-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Yeah you should. You keep embarrassing yourself with each post. Things I have learned today from your posting.

1. stopping crime is bad because we are giving specific treatment to certain types of crime.

2. You can change your socks in the same manner that you can change your race.

3. There is no such thing as a stereotypical references to n****rs, jews, or fags. references to them are basically non existent.

(07-23-2014 08:21 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Yeah you should. You keep embarrassing yourself with each post. Things I have learned today from your posting.

1. stopping crime is bad because we are giving specific treatment to certain types of crime.

2. You can change your socks in the same manner that you can change your race.

3. There is no such thing as a stereotypical references to n****rs, jews, or fags. references to them are basically non existent.

And you have reached your rock bottom. All while continuing to ignore my talking points.

Not really surprised considering that i am trying to have a debate with someone who legitimately believes employers should be allowed to fire people simply for being gay.

(07-23-2014 08:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:21 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Yeah you should. You keep embarrassing yourself with each post. Things I have learned today from your posting.

1. stopping crime is bad because we are giving specific treatment to certain types of crime.

2. You can change your socks in the same manner that you can change your race.

3. There is no such thing as a stereotypical references to n****rs, jews, or fags. references to them are basically non existent.

And you have reached your rock bottom. All while continuing to ignore my talking points.

Not really surprised considering that i am trying to have a debate with someone who legitimately believes employers should be allowed to fire people simply for being gay.

I knew it!!! SOP for John-boy, it seems!!!

(07-23-2014 08:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:21 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Yeah you should. You keep embarrassing yourself with each post. Things I have learned today from your posting.

1. stopping crime is bad because we are giving specific treatment to certain types of crime.

2. You can change your socks in the same manner that you can change your race.

3. There is no such thing as a stereotypical references to n****rs, jews, or fags. references to them are basically non existent.

And you have reached your rock bottom. All while continuing to ignore my talking points.

Not really surprised considering that i am trying to have a debate with someone who legitimately believes employers should be allowed to fire people simply for being gay.

It's really fun pissing liberals off. I might have to go to a PETA meeting wearing a fur coat and eating a cheeseburger.

(07-23-2014 08:28 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:21 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Yeah you should. You keep embarrassing yourself with each post. Things I have learned today from your posting.

1. stopping crime is bad because we are giving specific treatment to certain types of crime.

2. You can change your socks in the same manner that you can change your race.

3. There is no such thing as a stereotypical references to n****rs, jews, or fags. references to them are basically non existent.

And you have reached your rock bottom. All while continuing to ignore my talking points.

Not really surprised considering that i am trying to have a debate with someone who legitimately believes employers should be allowed to fire people simply for being gay.

I knew it!!! SOP for John-boy, it seems!!!

have you contributed one thing to this thread other than trying to insult me in some way?

You are seriously reaching dixie level.

How hard was this too understand john?

(07-23-2014 07:32 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  ....ALL BULLYING IS WRONG, ALL BULLIES GET PUNSIHED, THE PUNISHMENT FOR BULLYING IS THE SAME, THE REASON FOR THE BULLYING DOES NOT MATTER.

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  How hard was this too understand john?

(07-23-2014 07:32 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  ....ALL BULLYING IS WRONG, ALL BULLIES GET PUNSIHED, THE PUNISHMENT FOR BULLYING IS THE SAME, THE REASON FOR THE BULLYING DOES NOT MATTER.

lets see......

the part where that poster legitimately thinks teasing someone for wearing high socks is the same as teasing someone for having black skin

the part where that particular poster lives in a fictional world where only LGBT bullying is getting punished while other forms of bullying are ignored.

the part where that poster is simply put an extremely ignorant poster who has been proven time & time again to not give a cr.ap about LGBT people being given the same treatment as others and even tonight has shown that he supports people getting fired simply for being gay.

The part where that poster ignores all the core parts of my argument including the centerpiece of my argument and doesn't even address it.

(07-23-2014 08:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  How hard was this too understand john?

(07-23-2014 07:32 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  ....ALL BULLYING IS WRONG, ALL BULLIES GET PUNSIHED, THE PUNISHMENT FOR BULLYING IS THE SAME, THE REASON FOR THE BULLYING DOES NOT MATTER.

lets see......

the part where that poster legitimately thinks teasing someone for wearing high socks is the same as teasing someone for having black skin

the part where that particular poster lives in a fictional world where only LGBT bullying is getting punished while other forms of bullying are ignored.

the part where that poster is simply put an extremely ignorant poster who has been proven time & time again to not give a cr.ap about LGBT people being given the same treatment as others and even tonight has shown that he supports people getting fired simply for being gay.

The part where that poster ignores all the core parts of my argument including the centerpiece of my argument and doesn't even address it.

You're so gay.

(07-23-2014 08:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  How hard was this too understand john?

(07-23-2014 07:32 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  ....ALL BULLYING IS WRONG, ALL BULLIES GET PUNSIHED, THE PUNISHMENT FOR BULLYING IS THE SAME, THE REASON FOR THE BULLYING DOES NOT MATTER.

lets see......

the part where that poster legitimately thinks teasing someone for wearing high socks is the same as teasing someone for having black skin

the part where that particular poster lives in a fictional world where only LGBT bullying is getting punished while other forms of bullying are ignored.

the part where that poster is simply put an extremely ignorant poster who has been proven time & time again to not give a cr.ap about LGBT people being given the same treatment as others and even tonight has shown that he supports people getting fired simply for being gay.

The part where that poster ignores all the core parts of my argument including the centerpiece of my argument and doesn't even address it.

Are you the "poster"? I never said any of that, so you must be saying that.

About the firing gay people, YES religious organizations should not be required to hire or retain employees that don't agree with the values of that organization. Ever hear of separation of Church and State. I guess that doesn't apply in the gaystapo world.

(07-23-2014 08:40 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  How hard was this too understand john?

(07-23-2014 07:32 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  ....ALL BULLYING IS WRONG, ALL BULLIES GET PUNSIHED, THE PUNISHMENT FOR BULLYING IS THE SAME, THE REASON FOR THE BULLYING DOES NOT MATTER.

lets see......

the part where that poster legitimately thinks teasing someone for wearing high socks is the same as teasing someone for having black skin

the part where that particular poster lives in a fictional world where only LGBT bullying is getting punished while other forms of bullying are ignored.

the part where that poster is simply put an extremely ignorant poster who has been proven time & time again to not give a cr.ap about LGBT people being given the same treatment as others and even tonight has shown that he supports people getting fired simply for being gay.

The part where that poster ignores all the core parts of my argument including the centerpiece of my argument and doesn't even address it.

Are you the "poster"? I never said any of that, so you must be saying that.

About the firing gay people, YES religious organizations should not be required to hire or retain employees that don't agree with the values of that organization. Ever hear of separation of Church and State. I guess that doesn't apply in the gaystapo world.

Lol you were pretty clear what you were thinking......

not my fault you got outed....

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:28 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:21 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Yeah you should. You keep embarrassing yourself with each post. Things I have learned today from your posting.

1. stopping crime is bad because we are giving specific treatment to certain types of crime.

2. You can change your socks in the same manner that you can change your race.

3. There is no such thing as a stereotypical references to n****rs, jews, or fags. references to them are basically non existent.

And you have reached your rock bottom. All while continuing to ignore my talking points.

Not really surprised considering that i am trying to have a debate with someone who legitimately believes employers should be allowed to fire people simply for being gay.

I knew it!!! SOP for John-boy, it seems!!!

have you contributed one thing to this thread other than trying to insult me in some way?

You are seriously reaching dixie level.

I did, actually. Post #11. Called GLAAD a hate group. Wasn't directed at you, though. Which is probably why you're mad at me.

So lets drill it down here. The Gay lobby wants teenagers to be gay and to announce this to their classmates,
I am GAY, you can't bully me. But the other kids who get bullied do not get the same protection.

(07-23-2014 08:44 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:40 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  How hard was this too understand john?

(07-23-2014 07:32 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  ....ALL BULLYING IS WRONG, ALL BULLIES GET PUNSIHED, THE PUNISHMENT FOR BULLYING IS THE SAME, THE REASON FOR THE BULLYING DOES NOT MATTER.

lets see......

the part where that poster legitimately thinks teasing someone for wearing high socks is the same as teasing someone for having black skin

the part where that particular poster lives in a fictional world where only LGBT bullying is getting punished while other forms of bullying are ignored.

the part where that poster is simply put an extremely ignorant poster who has been proven time & time again to not give a cr.ap about LGBT people being given the same treatment as others and even tonight has shown that he supports people getting fired simply for being gay.

The part where that poster ignores all the core parts of my argument including the centerpiece of my argument and doesn't even address it.

Are you the "poster"? I never said any of that, so you must be saying that.

About the firing gay people, YES religious organizations should not be required to hire or retain employees that don't agree with the values of that organization. Ever hear of separation of Church and State. I guess that doesn't apply in the gaystapo world.

Lol you were pretty clear what you were thinking......

not my fault you got outed....

(07-23-2014 08:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  So lets drill it down here. The Gay lobby wants teenagers to be gay and to announce this to their classmates,
I am GAY, you can't bully me. But the other kids who get bullied do not get the same protection.

Thats the anti-bully agenda.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(07-23-2014 08:46 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:28 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:21 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

And you have reached your rock bottom. All while continuing to ignore my talking points.

Not really surprised considering that i am trying to have a debate with someone who legitimately believes employers should be allowed to fire people simply for being gay.

I knew it!!! SOP for John-boy, it seems!!!

have you contributed one thing to this thread other than trying to insult me in some way?

You are seriously reaching dixie level.

I did, actually. Post #11. Called GLAAD a hate group. Wasn't directed at you, though. Which is probably why you're mad at me.

so for the other 40 posts you were doing what exactly?

(07-23-2014 08:52 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  So lets drill it down here. The Gay lobby wants teenagers to be gay and to announce this to their classmates,
I am GAY, you can't bully me. But the other kids who get bullied do not get the same protection.

Thats the anti-bully agenda.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

correction: that is the anti-bullying agenda that only the ignorant homophobics can see.

(07-23-2014 08:54 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:46 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:28 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And you have reached your rock bottom. All while continuing to ignore my talking points.

Not really surprised considering that i am trying to have a debate with someone who legitimately believes employers should be allowed to fire people simply for being gay.

I knew it!!! SOP for John-boy, it seems!!!

have you contributed one thing to this thread other than trying to insult me in some way?

You are seriously reaching dixie level.

I did, actually. Post #11. Called GLAAD a hate group. Wasn't directed at you, though. Which is probably why you're mad at me.

so for the other 40 posts you were doing what exactly?

Trying to get you to listen to reason I'm guessing.

(07-23-2014 08:52 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  So lets drill it down here. The Gay lobby wants teenagers to be gay and to announce this to their classmates,
I am GAY, you can't bully me. But the other kids who get bullied do not get the same protection.

Thats the anti-bully agenda.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

How would you even bully a gay kid? Wedgies won't work.

(07-23-2014 08:56 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:54 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:46 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-23-2014 08:28 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  I knew it!!! SOP for John-boy, it seems!!!

have you contributed one thing to this thread other than trying to insult me in some way?

You are seriously reaching dixie level.

I did, actually. Post #11. Called GLAAD a hate group. Wasn't directed at you, though. Which is probably why you're mad at me.

so for the other 40 posts you were doing what exactly?

Trying to get you to listen to reason I'm guessing.

No it was just his continuing his month long stalking of me.

Anytime we are both online at the same time you can bet you a.ss that he is chasing me in a thread.