Quote:Two Connecticut State Troopers have now confirmed to Wolfgang Halbig that an 11,000 page document in his possession was “the script” for the Sandy Hook fake shooting.

The document details virtually every aspect of the staged event that would be presented to the public as though it had been a real shooting where 20 children died. This is “smoking gun” evidence.

The script even includes sworn statements from 16 Connecticut state troopers, including that they had entered the building through the shattered window at the school’s entrance. Those statements appear to be blatantly false.

No one who has seen photos of that window could possibly believe that such a large number could possibly have made an entry through that opening without risking harm to themselves or cutting their clothing. This is not something that trained Connecticut law enforcement officers would have done.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/07/16/...ffidavits/

The whole shooting was weird to say the least with the son going crazy and all.. But I can't buy into this conspiracy.

Last straw for me. I'm putting him on ignore and will no longer respond to him. I encourage everyone else to do the same.

Deplorable.

Now we know who Weir Al was serenading.

Wow. you're an idiot.

Hold up.. There's a such thing as not agreeing with someone, but there's also no need to insult the man. We're all allowed to believe what we want to believe.

Sandy Hook was an 11,000 page script, a live performance followed to T by 1,000 of actors?

I wished these conspiracy theorists would simply post these findings rather than saying this sh*t. They just come off as d'bags that like to make sh*t up to me.

(07-22-2014 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Last straw for me. I'm putting him on ignore and will no longer respond to him. I encourage everyone else to do the same.

Deplorable.

Dude you're a freaking puss. Stop clicking on his threads to piss moan and cry about them. Just don't click it if you don't want to read it. DUH

(07-22-2014 09:38 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-22-2014 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Last straw for me. I'm putting him on ignore and will no longer respond to him. I encourage everyone else to do the same.

Deplorable.

Dude you're a freaking puss. Stop clicking on his threads to piss moan and cry about them. Just don't click it if you don't want to read it. DUH

Liberals love to feign outrage.

Isn't that kinda what internet message boards are for?

There is a lot of weird stuff about it but like G, I don't buy the conspiracy theory.

(07-22-2014 10:35 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  There is a lot of weird stuff about it but like G, I don't buy the conspiracy theory.

If he has the script, he needs to show it. He does make a good point about the broken glass though.

(07-22-2014 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Last straw for me. I'm putting him on ignore and will no longer respond to him. I encourage everyone else to do the same.

Deplorable.

I'll get right on that! Um, not. Maybe you should put the wacko CT State Troopers on ignore...

I don't put anyone on ignore, that you can't brook arguments against your fatally flawed ideology says all I ever needed to hear about you.

(07-22-2014 09:18 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Hold up.. There's a such thing as not agreeing with someone, but there's also no need to insult the man. We're all allowed to believe what we want to believe.

Only if by "we" you mean progressive leftists...

(07-22-2014 09:39 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-22-2014 09:38 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-22-2014 08:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Last straw for me. I'm putting him on ignore and will no longer respond to him. I encourage everyone else to do the same.

Deplorable.

Dude you're a freaking puss. Stop clicking on his threads to piss moan and cry about them. Just don't click it if you don't want to read it. DUH

Liberals love to feign outrage.

It's part and parcel of their zeitgeist.

(07-22-2014 10:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(07-22-2014 10:35 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  There is a lot of weird stuff about it but like G, I don't buy the conspiracy theory.

Questioning known liars who have proven in the past to stage events (or allow them to happen) for political gain is not a conspiracy theory.

If there was nothing to see here, the government/authorities should simply adhere to expert's FOIA requests, rather than ignore, cover up, redact, edit, white-out, censor, etc.

Liberals have no problems with conspiracy theories as longs as they concoct them.

(07-22-2014 09:18 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Sandy Hook was an 11,000 page script, a live performance followed to T by 1,000 of actors?

Yeah, i don't get this one either.... I'm confused what kind of "script" is this supposed to be?

Are we supposed to believe that Obama is incompetent yet capable of pulling this off?

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

The Sandy Hook Hoax “Smoking Gun”: Game, Set, Match!

Quote:The most extraordinary is that the “iconic” photograph taken by Shannon Hicks for which she was named “Photographer of the Year” was actually one in a series staged for the fake shooting!

Quote:This case abounds with extraordinary proof that has been published in “Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an elaborate Hoax”, “Sandy Hook Elementary School: Closed in 2008, a stage in 2012″ and “The Newtown School Board meeting and the meaning of silence”, including, for example:

* that the final report from Connecticut authorities does not included the names, the ages or the sex of the alleged victims of the shooting: THAT IS EXTRAORDINARY!

* that the Clerk of Newtown entered into secret negotiations with the state legislature to avoid releasing their death certifications: THAT IS EXTRAORDINARY!

* that the Connecticut State Attorney General opposed the release of the 911 calls and had to be denied withholding them by courts: THAT IS EXTRAORDINARY!

* that a special panel of the state legislature recommended state employees who released information about Sandy Hook be subject to an E-felony: THAT IS EXTRAORDINARY!

* that those who were involved in the demolition of the school building itself were required to sign life-time gag orders about anything they saw or did not see: THAT IS EXTRAORDINARY!

What good reason could there possibly be to withhold the names, ages and sex of the deceased from the final reports about this child massacre? The claim was made that it was to spare the feelings of their parents, but think about it: their parents already knew they were dead!

In the face of abundant “extraordinary proof”, which I presented during our debate, Count One challenged its authenticity across the board. Since we have documented it from publicly available sources, it constitutes (what is known as) a prime facie case, which is entitled to be accepted as true absent any rebuttal, which Count One made no effort to provide. It was a debating stunt that no one should take seriously. It was a verbal charade.

Perhaps the most extraordinary proof, however, is the “iconic” photograph that was taken by Shannon Hicks, Associate Editor of The Newtown Bee, which Dennis Cimino and I have subjected to an extensive and detailed analysis. It is the only photo we have seen of any children being evacuated from the school:



Hicks reportedly took this photo “as an associate editor” and then, when another editor arrived, “changed into her firefighting gear and tried to help.” The account was promoted by NPR. Rather to our astonishment, Dan Cady, “The Sun and Sandy Hook”, had established the fact of the matter on 14 January 2013, more than a year-and-a-half prior to our efforts.

He has concluded that the Shannon Hicks’ photograph was taken at 9:45 AM on 12 November 2012, over a month before Sandy Hook. For the details of his calculation of the specific date and time, check out the article cited above. But shadow analysis is surprisingly complex and, given the distribution of the vehicles in the photo, I would not be surprised if it had been taken in much closer proximity to the event.