(07-09-2014 01:22 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:04 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  The tolerant left's war on women (and babies) strikes again.

Quote:

Holly Fisher drew scorn from left-wing opponents on Twitter when she posted a photo of herself wearing a pro-life shirt in front of a Hobby Lobby store and another on July 4th in which she was holding a gun and Bible in front of the American flag.

The latter photo was turned into a meme in which Fisher was likened to an Islamic terrorist.

Fisher discussed the disturbing attacks, including one appalling message that targeted her baby. After she complained that due to ObamaCare, she had lost her baby's cardiologist, someone on Twitter responded, "Good, I'm glad she did. One less conservative underling to worry about. Have a nice life."

"It's sad that someone who disagrees with you would wish death upon a baby. I can take the criticism upon myself, I know that's gonna happen. But for anyone to go so low as to wish death upon a baby, especially people who claim I'm intolerant and I'm hateful because I disagree with them? It's just shocking," said Fisher, who added she wants to encourage other conservatives to stand up for their beliefs.

Another tweet to Fisher asked her to "fly on down to Florida so we could stone you to death." Fisher said she doesn't understand why the Fourth of July photo generated so much backlash.

"It's America's founding principles. That's all that's in the picture," said Fisher, adding she has noticed a "growing intolerance" from the left toward conservatives in recent years.

Watch the full interview above.

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/07/09/mom...-and-bible

Freedom of speech does not come without consequences.

I love it how you and UofM use the 1st Amendment to hide behind but all a conservative has to do is peep a word of what you don't like and you blast us by calling us racists, homophobes, or whatever.

(07-09-2014 01:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  UofMemphis has a guilty conscience. It seems his defense of these twitter trolls shows some kind of allegiance. Seeing an actual reaction from on of his normal targets has him a bit uncomfortable.

When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

and I'll say it again. I really wish more of these people would come out of the shadows...

I've seen plenty of comments coming from the right over the years that were equally as nasty.

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  UofMemphis has a guilty conscience. It seems his defense of these twitter trolls shows some kind of allegiance. Seeing an actual reaction from on of his normal targets has him a bit uncomfortable.

When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

Quote:It's sad that someone who disagrees with you would wish death upon a baby. I can take the criticism upon myself, I know that's gonna happen. But for anyone to go so low as to wish death upon a baby, especially people who claim I'm intolerant and I'm hateful because I disagree with them? It's just shocking," said Fisher, who added she wants to encourage other conservatives to stand up for their beliefs.

The baby didn't put its personal life online. Wishing death upon it is distasteful at best.

Notice how quickly our resident liberals condoned this kind of behavior. One actually suggesting she deserved it for posting her "personal life"

It just reinforces my initial statements. Come out of the shadows cowards.

(07-09-2014 01:27 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  UofMemphis has a guilty conscience. It seems his defense of these twitter trolls shows some kind of allegiance. Seeing an actual reaction from on of his normal targets has him a bit uncomfortable.

When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

and I'll say it again. I really wish more of these people would come out of the shadows...

I've seen plenty of comments coming from the right over the years that were equally as nasty.

Then start a thread about them.

(07-09-2014 01:28 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  UofMemphis has a guilty conscience. It seems his defense of these twitter trolls shows some kind of allegiance. Seeing an actual reaction from on of his normal targets has him a bit uncomfortable.

When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

Quote:It's sad that someone who disagrees with you would wish death upon a baby. I can take the criticism upon myself, I know that's gonna happen. But for anyone to go so low as to wish death upon a baby, especially people who claim I'm intolerant and I'm hateful because I disagree with them? It's just shocking," said Fisher, who added she wants to encourage other conservatives to stand up for their beliefs.

The baby didn't put its personal life online. Wishing death upon it is distasteful at best.

I agree. The baby has nothing to do with it.

As a mother however, you should consider the consequences before doing stuff like this. It's obvious she wanted attention and now she has it.

(07-09-2014 01:29 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:28 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  UofMemphis has a guilty conscience. It seems his defense of these twitter trolls shows some kind of allegiance. Seeing an actual reaction from on of his normal targets has him a bit uncomfortable.

When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

Quote:It's sad that someone who disagrees with you would wish death upon a baby. I can take the criticism upon myself, I know that's gonna happen. But for anyone to go so low as to wish death upon a baby, especially people who claim I'm intolerant and I'm hateful because I disagree with them? It's just shocking," said Fisher, who added she wants to encourage other conservatives to stand up for their beliefs.

The baby didn't put its personal life online. Wishing death upon it is distasteful at best.

I agree. The baby has nothing to do with it.

As a mother however, you should consider the consequences before doing stuff like this. It's obvious she wanted attention and now she has it.

BS. She did nothing that warrants "consequences"

There is nothing controversial about that photograph other than liberals thinking their hatred for America should be mainstream.

I love when the paranoid mafia comes out in full force. She posted a picture trying to troll liberals and then cried when they made fun of her...what a loser...

(07-09-2014 01:31 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:29 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:28 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  UofMemphis has a guilty conscience. It seems his defense of these twitter trolls shows some kind of allegiance. Seeing an actual reaction from on of his normal targets has him a bit uncomfortable.

When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

Quote:It's sad that someone who disagrees with you would wish death upon a baby. I can take the criticism upon myself, I know that's gonna happen. But for anyone to go so low as to wish death upon a baby, especially people who claim I'm intolerant and I'm hateful because I disagree with them? It's just shocking," said Fisher, who added she wants to encourage other conservatives to stand up for their beliefs.

The baby didn't put its personal life online. Wishing death upon it is distasteful at best.

I agree. The baby has nothing to do with it.

As a mother however, you should consider the consequences before doing stuff like this. It's obvious she wanted attention and now she has it.

BS. She did nothing that warrants "consequences"

There is nothing controversial about that photograph other than liberals thinking their hatred for America should be mainstream.

If there is nothing controversial about this photograph then there is nothing controversial about the other photograph. Is there or isn't ther e a difference?

If one can be upset by one then others can be upset by the other.

It's consistancy here. That is all I am saying.

(07-09-2014 01:31 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:29 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:28 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:21 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  UofMemphis has a guilty conscience. It seems his defense of these twitter trolls shows some kind of allegiance. Seeing an actual reaction from on of his normal targets has him a bit uncomfortable.

When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

Quote:It's sad that someone who disagrees with you would wish death upon a baby. I can take the criticism upon myself, I know that's gonna happen. But for anyone to go so low as to wish death upon a baby, especially people who claim I'm intolerant and I'm hateful because I disagree with them? It's just shocking," said Fisher, who added she wants to encourage other conservatives to stand up for their beliefs.

The baby didn't put its personal life online. Wishing death upon it is distasteful at best.

I agree. The baby has nothing to do with it.

As a mother however, you should consider the consequences before doing stuff like this. It's obvious she wanted attention and now she has it.

BS. She did nothing that warrants "consequences"

There is nothing controversial about that photograph other than liberals thinking their hatred for America should be mainstream.

The only thing controversial about it is that it's creepily similar to a terrorist's pictures. I thought is was made to mock conservatives when I first saw it.

(07-09-2014 01:10 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Oh, the horror...

And this NEVER happens to a liberal online. NEVER!

(07-09-2014 01:34 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:31 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:29 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:28 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:23 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  When you post your personal life online, you can't complain when others give their opinion...keep your personal life, personal, if you can't deal with it.

Quote:It's sad that someone who disagrees with you would wish death upon a baby. I can take the criticism upon myself, I know that's gonna happen. But for anyone to go so low as to wish death upon a baby, especially people who claim I'm intolerant and I'm hateful because I disagree with them? It's just shocking," said Fisher, who added she wants to encourage other conservatives to stand up for their beliefs.

The baby didn't put its personal life online. Wishing death upon it is distasteful at best.

I agree. The baby has nothing to do with it.

As a mother however, you should consider the consequences before doing stuff like this. It's obvious she wanted attention and now she has it.

BS. She did nothing that warrants "consequences"

There is nothing controversial about that photograph other than liberals thinking their hatred for America should be mainstream.

The only thing controversial about it is that it's creepily similar to a terrorist's pictures. I thought is was made to mock conservatives when I first saw it.

Exactly.

I find it ironic that conservatives would be upset by the outrage over this picture when it is exactly the same as the other picture.

The only difference is the choice of religion. How can someone not have the same reaction by one and not the other is beyond me. That goes for both sides.

(07-09-2014 01:40 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:34 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:31 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:29 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:28 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  The baby didn't put its personal life online. Wishing death upon it is distasteful at best.

I agree. The baby has nothing to do with it.

As a mother however, you should consider the consequences before doing stuff like this. It's obvious she wanted attention and now she has it.

BS. She did nothing that warrants "consequences"

There is nothing controversial about that photograph other than liberals thinking their hatred for America should be mainstream.

The only thing controversial about it is that it's creepily similar to a terrorist's pictures. I thought is was made to mock conservatives when I first saw it.

Exactly.

I find it ironic that conservatives would be upset by the outrage over this picture when it is exactly the same as the other picture.

The only difference is the choice of religion. How can someone not have the same reaction by one and not the other is beyond me. That goes for both sides.

Because one is on our side and the other wants to kill us all?

(07-09-2014 01:41 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:40 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:34 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:31 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:29 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I agree. The baby has nothing to do with it.

As a mother however, you should consider the consequences before doing stuff like this. It's obvious she wanted attention and now she has it.

BS. She did nothing that warrants "consequences"

There is nothing controversial about that photograph other than liberals thinking their hatred for America should be mainstream.

The only thing controversial about it is that it's creepily similar to a terrorist's pictures. I thought is was made to mock conservatives when I first saw it.

Exactly.

I find it ironic that conservatives would be upset by the outrage over this picture when it is exactly the same as the other picture.

The only difference is the choice of religion. How can someone not have the same reaction by one and not the other is beyond me. That goes for both sides.

Because one is on our side and the other wants to kill us all?

But both are extreme positions because both photos push religions and governments of peace while at the same time pushing violence.

They should both be rejected in my opinion.

I have no sympathy for radical leftists that want to excuse this kind of trash by making up some kind of moral equivalency

It reminds me a lot of Bill Ayers.

(07-09-2014 01:47 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I have no sympathy for radical leftists that want to excuse this kind of trash by making up some kind of moral equivalency

It reminds me a lot of Bill Ayers.

On the contrary. I'm condemning it. But then again. I'm not a liberal.

This young lady must have drilled the liberals in the azz, because they sure are butthurt right now.

(07-09-2014 01:53 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-09-2014 01:47 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I have no sympathy for radical leftists that want to excuse this kind of trash by making up some kind of moral equivalency

It reminds me a lot of Bill Ayers.

On the contrary. I'm condemning it. But then again. I'm not a liberal.

This comment was directed to all liberals who have rushed in to defend these lowlifes. If you condemn it, then condemn it. There should be no condition attached or moral equivalency attached.

I see no difference between the two photographs and both should be condemned. If I'm not mistaken, both have been. Therefore, nothing to see here.

Normal people don't take pictures like that in the first place, even if they do agree.