http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/201...s/?print=1

Worst commie ever!

(07-03-2014 10:00 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/201...s/?print=1

Worst commie ever!

as if that walking dick with ears had anything to do with it.

Boy had we not had that stimulus plan, the Dow would be at 22,000 by now.

(07-03-2014 10:00 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/201...s/?print=1

Worst commie ever!

How did Obama do that? The market grew in spite of him, not because of him.

(07-03-2014 10:05 AM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:00 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/201...s/?print=1

Worst commie ever!

How did Obama do that? The market grew in spite of him, not because of him.

It's actually inflation b/c of a loose monetary policy. And since it's reported that many people are missing this rise, I'm not sure why this bit of income inequality is so good?

umemphis' streak of being wrong continues. reminds me of some other posters. Sock puppet much?

(07-03-2014 10:08 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:05 AM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:00 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/201...s/?print=1

Worst commie ever!

How did Obama do that? The market grew in spite of him, not because of him.

It's actually inflation b/c of a loose monetary policy. And since it's reported that many people are missing this rise, I'm not sure why this bit of income inequality is so good?

umemphis' streak of being wrong continues. reminds me of some other posters. Sock puppet much?

I know, this is truly the end times...

Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

apparently 1400 people a lot smarter than you

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

What statistical measure would you suggest, idiot. This is done all the time even by a University. You might as well give it up.

The COTUS is a effing disgrace to this nation and every hard working, or wanting to be hard working, individual worth anything.

(07-03-2014 10:26 AM)bevotex Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

apparently 1400 people a lot smarter than you

Ouch, you wound me, sir!

(07-03-2014 10:26 AM)bevotex Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

apparently 1400 people a lot smarter than you

and thanks

(07-03-2014 10:26 AM)tigertom Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

What statistical measure would you suggest, idiot. This is done all the time even by a University. You might as well give it up.

The COTUS is a effing disgrace to this nation and every hard working, or wanting to be hard working, individual worth anything.

I dunno...vote, maybe?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St...tion,_2012

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

Actually, if you knew anything about statistical sampling, you'd know that 1400 is an extremely strong sample. A sample size of 1400 provides a 99% confidence that the sample is correct to within +/-3%.

Obama has been great for Wall Street and a disaster for Main Street. I thought he was for helping the middle class and the little people? The stock numbers are up because the printing presses are printing money as fast as they can. This is not helping the average Joe.

(07-03-2014 10:33 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

Actually, if you knew anything about statistical sampling, you'd know that 1400 is an extremely strong sample.

When did polls start deciding things? polls say the majority want universal background checks and an assault weapons ban...how's that workin' out, champ?

Thank God for sequestration!!!!!!!!!!

We traded over 500k full time jobs for 800k part time jobs, while the number of people not in the labor force reached an all time high. Real wages remained stagnant.

And all the economically illiterate libs celebrate.

In related news, the Caracas stock market has been soaring the past few years.

(07-03-2014 10:28 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:26 AM)bevotex Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:22 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-03-2014 10:21 AM)tigertom Wrote:  Try this on you UofMemphis idiot.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-w...e=ugg11hdd

He didn't get this as a result of ANY economic policies... EVER.

A whole 1,400 people polled...wow

apparently 1400 people a lot smarter than you

Ouch, you wound me, sir!

The truth shall set you free, but first it will piss you off.

(07-03-2014 10:36 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  We traded over 500k full time jobs for 800k part time jobs, while the number of people not in the labor force reached an all time high. Real wages remained stagnant.

And all the economically illiterate libs celebrate.

In related news, the Caracas stock market has been soaring the past few years.

Great point! Lets raise the minimum wage! Hasn't gone up in 5 years...