(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

You're not the Supreme Court. Nobody cares what you want.

(07-01-2014 03:22 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

You're not the Supreme Court. Nobody cares what you want.

clearly he does...speaking in absolutes again?

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

You want them to follow a regulation or a law?

last I looked the ACA was a law.

(07-01-2014 03:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

You want them to follow a regulation or a law?

last I looked the ACA was a law.

Thanks for demonstrating that discussing the topic is entirely beyond you.

(07-01-2014 03:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

You want them to follow a regulation or a law?

last I looked the ACA was a law.

Thanks for demonstrating that discussing the topic is entirely beyond you.

if it's so simple, explain it...i'll wait...I'm just another liberal watching soccer.

You and all the rest of us are waiting for Zero to follow his own law.

(07-01-2014 04:31 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

You want them to follow a regulation or a law?

last I looked the ACA was a law.

Thanks for demonstrating that discussing the topic is entirely beyond you.

if it's so simple, explain it...i'll wait...I'm just another liberal watching soccer.

Law v regulation

They are different words with different meanings, simple.

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

And now according to the Supreme Court....they are. You got what you wanted.

(07-01-2014 05:52 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

And now according to the Supreme Court....they are. You got what you wanted.

I never said what I wanted...I follow the law.

(07-01-2014 05:53 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:52 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

And now according to the Supreme Court....they are. You got what you wanted.

I never said what I wanted...I follow the law.

Yes you did.

(07-01-2014 05:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:53 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:52 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

And now according to the Supreme Court....they are. You got what you wanted.

I never said what I wanted...I follow the law.

Yes you did.

you got me...I just mowed the yard...I should probably go lie down...damn it's hot out here

(07-01-2014 05:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:53 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:52 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

And now according to the Supreme Court....they are. You got what you wanted.

I never said what I wanted...I follow the law.

Yes you did.

you got me...I just mowed the yard...I should probably go lie down...damn it's hot out here

I'm with you on that, it is definitely hot out there.

(07-01-2014 09:43 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Putting out the "war on women" narrative is only for the ill-informed plantation women. It has worked well for democrats in the past and will probably continue because a majority of apathetic women exist today and the false talking points, fabricated in focus groups is the thing that is running rampant.

Has anyone pointed out that of the 20 kinds of birth control originally mandated by ACA only 4 will be dropped 2 of which are morning after pills. The most common pills will still be covered.

(07-01-2014 06:20 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 09:43 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Putting out the "war on women" narrative is only for the ill-informed plantation women. It has worked well for democrats in the past and will probably continue because a majority of apathetic women exist today and the false talking points, fabricated in focus groups is the thing that is running rampant.

Has anyone pointed out that of the 20 kinds of birth control originally mandated by ACA only 4 will be dropped 2 of which are morning after pills. The most common pills will still be covered.

countless times, but there are two kinds of people who repeat the rhetoric: Those who know it is false and use it on the stupid and those who are too stupid to understand anything regarding those 4 contraceptives. The latter are uneducated, illogical people driven by emotion, and only listen to populist talking points.

(07-01-2014 03:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 02:59 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  liberals think that not requiring someone else to pay for an item is equal to denying the person from getting an item.


so I purpose that we have a gun control bill that states that ones employer is not required to purchase a plan that would buy the employee a gun and tell them that is denying the employee from getting a gun.

I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

You want them to follow a regulation or a law?

last I looked the ACA was a law.

the fugitive slave act was a law. so, it's possible for a flawed congress to pass a bad law, and for a comically incompetent president to sign it.

(07-01-2014 05:40 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  You and all the rest of us are waiting for Zero to follow the Constitution.

FIFY

(07-01-2014 08:57 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  The company raised its full-time wages from $13 to $14 per hour – almost double the federal minimum wage – in April of last year. Hobby Lobby also opened more than 30 new stores across the U.S. last year, creating over 1,000 additional jobs.

So, to be clear, liberals are upset about a company that still offers birth control and pays their employees a minimum wage of $14 an hour.

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/07/152495-h...t-get-job/

I'm going over there today and buy something nice for my house. And I'm going to make sure it's not on sale!

(07-01-2014 05:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:53 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:52 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 03:03 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  I wanted Hobby Lobby to follow the law...nothing more.

And now according to the Supreme Court....they are. You got what you wanted.

I never said what I wanted...I follow the law.

Yes you did.

you got me...I just mowed the yard...I should probably go lie down...damn it's hot out here

Do you need some Mexes to do the job Americans won't do? Liberals need to support their overlords.

I haven't stepped foot in a Hobby Lobby in many years but for me the entire thing comes down to the right of the owners to run their business as they see fit. The company doesn't belong to the public and nobody says anybody has to work there. It's simple freedom of association and freedom to pursue your own goals as a business and as individuals to whom the company is an expression of them.

(07-02-2014 11:27 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:53 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 05:52 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  And now according to the Supreme Court....they are. You got what you wanted.

I never said what I wanted...I follow the law.

Yes you did.

you got me...I just mowed the yard...I should probably go lie down...damn it's hot out here

Do you need some Mexes to do the job Americans won't do? Liberals need to support their overlords.

My dad had knee replacement, and mom had cataract surgery...I'm filling in by mowing the yard, cleaning their floors, and dusting the house while their out of commission. (Like a good son should)