(07-01-2014 09:41 AM)Cali_Cat Wrote: Sorry to break up the circle jerk, but you mind providing me with actual evidence??? UC was content doing nothing until UofL left after that they announced the Nippert expansion and started sending Christmas cards. Ono being some great CR wizard has no basis......
I agree with you, that there is room for you and Rag to be critical of Ono (Bohn? Let's see later). I believe he had one quote that stated this was a "president's club". Well, the recent article about how involved UL's Jurich was in their ACC bid underscores the importance of an AD's role in this.
Can we PLEASE drop this "expansion is done at the presidents' level" charade? Technically, yes, that is where the decisions are made. However, when athletics are taken into account, the AD's input is absolutely crucial.
Anyone who didn't think that the "dead period" after Thomas left, where we didn't have a full-time AD for a couple months, didn't affect our expansion profile has his/her head in the sand.
Also, it shouldn't be ignored that, ever since our failed bid for the ACC, it seems like BYU has been discussed much more than UC, regarding the Big 12. And, UCF has been discussed at least as much as us. UCF - perhaps moving ahead of us since UL left. Should we be satisfied with that??
(edit) I guess I only get irritated by the overt frustration over our conference, because there are a lot worse things that can happen one's own life. But I never did say that I disagreed with the sentiment :-)