The unofficial online home for fans of the Western Michigan University Broncos. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

Who knew:

http://www2.thepostgame.com/blog/daily-t...d%3D494927

Cry for attention.

^I was just going to say, "who listens to her anyway".

(06-28-2014 07:57 PM)Broncobelt Wrote:  ^I was just going to say, "who listens to her anyway".

Strangely, Coulters books end buried in the back of the book store with no markdowns and they still end up on the NYTs best sellers list.

Libs hate her because because her column takes something that is news worthy that week, points out the holes in the argument and then mocks the lefties for their twisted logic. Pretty much exactly what John Daily does with conservatives, but the conservatives don't get in a lather. Libs think they're the smartest people in the room and cant handle their own words being mocked, hence they go ape chit over Coulter.

If you actually read her article rather than the sad sack nobody trying to piggy back on her popularity, you would see she's just yanking liberals chains, which as stated drives them bonkers.

But like you say, who listens to her

Saying that about soccer was just a lame ploy for headlines...that worked. She, Rush and Dip must coordinate their bs outrageous statements to get attention.

(06-28-2014 10:52 PM)DesertBronco Wrote:  Saying that about soccer was just a lame ploy for headlines...that worked. She, Rush and Dip must coordinate their bs outrageous statements to get attention.

Predictable.

You read a guys article that was critical of what she said, and you bought it hook, line and sinker. Did you even read the ACTUAL ARTICLE?

If you did, please pick out something in the article that is a lame ploy for headlines? She deals in sarcasm, I'm pretty sure a smart guy like you gets that.

I will say, I have enjoyed watching the US in the World Cup, but I can't sit through an entire game, Simply too dull, and not much happening. I can take it in doses, and admittedly am watching it more out of a patriotic sense than do to a great passion for the sport.

As for saying it's a lame ploy on her part. The only lame ploy is the by the nobody who wrote the article. No knows who the hell this guy is other than another unknown blogger trying to get his name out there. Piggy backing on Ann Coulter (well known, a best selling author) is about the only chance this twit will ever have of getting his fifteen seconds of fame.

Again, read the article, try not to be a complete dolt and take it totally literal (she writes with a sarcastic flare simply to irritate and mock libs), and tell me what she says that is so off the wall to you. Here, I'll begin. Let me know what you find so off the wall about her opening paragraph. Be specific, don't spin , don't drop a bunch of pointless cliches.

Coulter

Quote:(1) Individual achievement is not a big factor in soccer. In a real sport, players fumble passes, throw bricks and drop fly balls -- all in front of a crowd. When baseball players strike out, they're standing alone at the plate. But there's also individual glory in home runs, touchdowns and slam-dunks.


In soccer, the blame is dispersed and almost no one scores anyway. There are no heroes, no losers, no accountability, and no child's fragile self-esteem is bruised. There's a reason perpetually alarmed women are called "soccer moms," not "football moms."

(06-28-2014 11:58 PM)Chipdip2 Wrote:  

(06-28-2014 10:52 PM)DesertBronco Wrote:  Saying that about soccer was just a lame ploy for headlines...that worked. She, Rush and Dip must coordinate their bs outrageous statements to get attention.

Predictable.

You read a guys article that was critical of what she said, and you bought it hook, line and sinker. Did you even read the ACTUAL ARTICLE?

If you did, please pick out something in the article that is a lame ploy for headlines? She deals in sarcasm, I'm pretty sure a smart guy like you gets that.

I will say, I have enjoyed watching the US in the World Cup, but I can't sit through an entire game, Simply too dull, and not much happening. I can take it in doses, and admittedly am watching it more out of a patriotic sense than do to a great passion for the sport.

As for saying it's a lame ploy on her part. The only lame ploy is the by the nobody who wrote the article. No knows who the hell this guy is other than another unknown blogger trying to get his name out there. Piggy backing on Ann Coulter (well known, a best selling author) is about the only chance this twit will ever have of getting his fifteen seconds of fame.

Again, read the article, try not to be a complete dolt and take it totally literal (she writes with a sarcastic flare simply to irritate and mock libs), and tell me what she says that is so off the wall to you. Here, I'll begin. Let me know what you find so off the wall about her opening paragraph. Be specific, don't spin , don't drop a bunch of pointless cliches.

Coulter

Quote:(1) Individual achievement is not a big factor in soccer. In a real sport, players fumble passes, throw bricks and drop fly balls -- all in front of a crowd. When baseball players strike out, they're standing alone at the plate. But there's also individual glory in home runs, touchdowns and slam-dunks.


In soccer, the blame is dispersed and almost no one scores anyway. There are no heroes, no losers, no accountability, and no child's fragile self-esteem is bruised. There's a reason perpetually alarmed women are called "soccer moms," not "football moms."

You MORON, did you not catch that I said, "Rush, Ann and Dip"? Cheese and Rice, you're pining to win an argument since I slapped you around on the football forum. Get over yourself.

That being said, it sure is funny to see you KNEE JERK react when anyone even mentions your BOY Ann Coulter in a negative light.

(06-29-2014 12:16 AM)DesertBronco Wrote:  

(06-28-2014 11:58 PM)Chipdip2 Wrote:  

(06-28-2014 10:52 PM)DesertBronco Wrote:  Saying that about soccer was just a lame ploy for headlines...that worked. She, Rush and Dip must coordinate their bs outrageous statements to get attention.

Predictable.

You read a guys article that was critical of what she said, and you bought it hook, line and sinker. Did you even read the ACTUAL ARTICLE?

If you did, please pick out something in the article that is a lame ploy for headlines? She deals in sarcasm, I'm pretty sure a smart guy like you gets that.

I will say, I have enjoyed watching the US in the World Cup, but I can't sit through an entire game, Simply too dull, and not much happening. I can take it in doses, and admittedly am watching it more out of a patriotic sense than do to a great passion for the sport.

As for saying it's a lame ploy on her part. The only lame ploy is the by the nobody who wrote the article. No knows who the hell this guy is other than another unknown blogger trying to get his name out there. Piggy backing on Ann Coulter (well known, a best selling author) is about the only chance this twit will ever have of getting his fifteen seconds of fame.

Again, read the article, try not to be a complete dolt and take it totally literal (she writes with a sarcastic flare simply to irritate and mock libs), and tell me what she says that is so off the wall to you. Here, I'll begin. Let me know what you find so off the wall about her opening paragraph. Be specific, don't spin , don't drop a bunch of pointless cliches.

Coulter

Quote:(1) Individual achievement is not a big factor in soccer. In a real sport, players fumble passes, throw bricks and drop fly balls -- all in front of a crowd. When baseball players strike out, they're standing alone at the plate. But there's also individual glory in home runs, touchdowns and slam-dunks.


In soccer, the blame is dispersed and almost no one scores anyway. There are no heroes, no losers, no accountability, and no child's fragile self-esteem is bruised. There's a reason perpetually alarmed women are called "soccer moms," not "football moms."

You MORON, did you not catch that I said, "Rush, Ann and Dip"? Cheese and Rice, you're pining to win an argument since I slapped you around on the football forum. Get over yourself.

That being said, it sure is funny to see you KNEE JERK react when anyone even mentions your BOY Ann Coulter in a negative light.

As ALWAYS, you can't delve in specifics. You generalize, throw out cliches, try to deflect from the details, and hope nobody notices. It appears they're starting to notice.

It's not that I actually care that you have a differing opinion. It's that you call anyone disagrees with you some idiotic catch phrase, BUT YOU NEVER ACTUALLY DEFEND YOUR POSITION.

As for slapping me around on the football forum, you're becoming delusional. You're not slapping anyone around. You're slowly becoming a forum joke. Your handle has become a punchline to jokes. It's almost sad to watch, a once reasonably informed WMU sports fan beginning to look as if his way of analyzing a program is to check the standings.

lol. That "sad to watch" catch phrase has been thrown around about you for years rubber neck. That's hilarious if you think you, and the old scout mafia really matter around here. Talk about a joke.

What sort of specifics do you need to debate Ann?! Seriously. Her soccer statement is just another in a long line of attention cries designed to stir up her base and get headlines.

Luckily for her, she has foot soldiers like you to do her bidding when most just discount her. That would be otherwise described as a bunch of stooges. Like you, slappo.