Hey Marsha fan.


9-0.

*drops the mic*

(06-30-2014 12:41 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  Hey Marsha fan.


9-0.

*drops the mic*

??

Wow I would be extremely embarrassed to go to the sec board talking sh@t. Lol!! You small fries really do have small jock issues about the aac.

(06-30-2014 12:20 PM)Seminole Indian Wrote:  Actually, I think every school not in one of the power conference, and many that are, has adopted the position that it is every dog for themselves under the new 'arrangement'.

Because most of the AAC have been members in good standings with the have-not's for some time this will not come as a shock.

Sorry some of you don't like having negative names attached to your programs based on circumstances and not merit but welcome to America, because that is what Americans do.

I do look forward to seeing how your teams perform on the field this year, so best of luck to each program, and I hope you have a successful season.

you are projecting your own personal sunbelt views from your sunbelt perspective on everyoe else

your in a position where your conference as a whole has no chance at respect and the only way any respect comes anyones way it will be on an individual team level.

that is not the situation here actually it is the opposite, in c-usa almost every team had a "dogfight for themselves" mentality and absolutely non preached conference

since joining the AAC everyone preaches conference,even most of the other g4 talk about our inflated egos think we are better than we are a a conference, true or not its shows the unity and greatness we think this league could be. go to every single teams official twitter or twitter of the AD's. if you'l scroll throughl find all of them cheering on UCF in the BCS and congratulating them after. youll find them cheering on UConn during the tourney and posting tweets about having the best postseason winning percentage from all tourneys. all our coaches talk about this league as a good platform for recruiting.

and just last week aresco was in ecu saying we are knocking on the door of being a power confernce, they right now its the p5 plus 1

and in the new "arrangement" its actually become more conference oriented, with auto bids gone the devaluing of the "bcs bowls" with only 4 playoffs spots and 5 major conference. the value of conference strength has been amplified. a few years ago the arguments were "i think usc is better than texas" today you are 10x more likely to here debates like "i think the pac12 is better than the big12"

in the sunbelt you are in the dog fight for yourself but that isnt the case here. your perspective isnt our perspective

Preach on pesik. I think our mind set kinda caught uconn fans off guard but I think they ended up appreciating it. We all know that we would jump in a heartbeat for a p5 invite but most real fans see the potential of the American. Last year was a fun ride that pleasantly surprised everyone.

(06-30-2014 11:47 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 10:46 AM)NBPirate Wrote:  Non-Qualifier University

Also known as good ole "NQU."

They have a thread about non-qualifiers right now on the CUSA Board.

For the previous ECU posters. Show some class guys. You do remember they curb stomp us in WV last year? What about our 2000 bowl game? Don't forget were you come from

(07-01-2014 01:13 AM)ecupirate01 Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 11:47 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 10:46 AM)NBPirate Wrote:  Non-Qualifier University

Also known as good ole "NQU."

They have a thread about non-qualifiers right now on the CUSA Board.

For the previous ECU posters. Show some class guys. You do remember they curb stomp us in WV last year? What about our 2000 bowl game? Don't forget were you come from

We are not forgetting where we came from, which is why ECU fans are happy to be back with the schools we have always played against. USM will be missed, but I for one will not miss Marshall. Marshall = Appalachian State, except Appalachian State doesn't cheat or accept a roster full of nonqualifiers.

(06-30-2014 12:56 PM)mufanatehc Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 12:41 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  Hey Marsha fan.


9-0.

*drops the mic*

??

Let's see if you remember this one: 54-17

(07-01-2014 07:39 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 01:13 AM)ecupirate01 Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 11:47 AM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 10:46 AM)NBPirate Wrote:  Non-Qualifier University

Also known as good ole "NQU."

They have a thread about non-qualifiers right now on the CUSA Board.

For the previous ECU posters. Show some class guys. You do remember they curb stomp us in WV last year? What about our 2000 bowl game? Don't forget were you come from

We are not forgetting where we came from, which is why ECU fans are happy to be back with the schools we have always played against. USM will be missed, but I for one will not miss Marshall. Marshall = Appalachian State, except Appalachian State doesn't cheat or accept a roster full of nonqualifiers.

I am with ya Marv, glad to be back with some of our old foes. But I don't have anything against Marshall. Every Marsh fan that has come by my tailgate have been respectful. Went to the other school in WV for a game in 2005 and thought I was going to end up in jail by the time the game was over. Those couch burners are a different breed.

(07-01-2014 09:19 AM)RobUCF Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 12:56 PM)mufanatehc Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 12:41 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  Hey Marsha fan.


9-0.

*drops the mic*

??

Let's see if you remember this one: 54-17

If he was trying to pull out the series record, he was wrong...

(06-29-2014 04:34 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  

(06-29-2014 02:51 PM)Seminole Indian Wrote:  

(06-29-2014 02:34 PM)Tigersmoke Wrote:  Seminole Indian why oh why do you bottom of the barrel teams. In bottom of the barrel conferences keep coming to our board trying to convince us that we are all-in-one as far as the g5's go? The American is and has proven to be better than the other g4's. Lol

Don't think there is any doubt about that but I'm not really a Conference focused guy (last year the SBC was the top non-aq conference in football, and their teams got the BCS checks, and I think 2nd the year before), because going forward it is every school for themselves.

There are good football teams scattered through out the G5's, and bad ones. Every G5 Conference has both, and I can't wait to see which teams rise to the top of the G5 pack.

,

I see what you did there. AAC was an AQ conference this last year, so you're making that statement knowing you didn't include us in your comparison. This year will show just how far behind the AAC your conference really is. Good luck. But regardless of how hard you try, we're not equals. Never have been, never will be. So GFYS and go back to your board where you belong.

Dude your starting to sound like Rutgers fans talking about the AAC. We earned our way and started in the sbc and they can to. Hopefully we are in the b12 by then


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(06-30-2014 12:56 PM)mufanatehc Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 12:41 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  Hey Marsha fan.


9-0.

*drops the mic*

??

Rap contest?

(06-29-2014 10:45 PM)banker Wrote:  

(06-28-2014 05:31 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 09:19 PM)banker Wrote:  His argument is apparently that the best AAC teams can beat mediocre B12 teams and the best B12 teams can beat mediocre AAC teams. The way to do it would be to list 1 vs 1 thru 10 vs 10. I would say the B12 would go 7-3 at worst and probably 9-1.

Sounds like you were part of the group that bet $$$ and took Baylor -17 vs UCF in the BCS Bowl.

Congrats

Nope, but I don't confuse the outcome of one game with what a team could do across a full season. Example, wvu wins the Big East and destroys Clemson in the Orange. Bowl. Next season, with their QB and 2 first round WRs back, along with most of their team, they start 5-0 but then break down playing week in and week out against the Big 12.

Have a great game against a big opponent in a big game, especially when the other team views you as beneath them, is a great story, but it's not the same as beating quality teams week after week after week.

Sounds sorta like last year's season ending beating of ECU then getting gang raped by Rice?

(06-29-2014 10:45 PM)banker Wrote:  

(06-28-2014 05:31 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 09:19 PM)banker Wrote:  His argument is apparently that the best AAC teams can beat mediocre B12 teams and the best B12 teams can beat mediocre AAC teams. The way to do it would be to list 1 vs 1 thru 10 vs 10. I would say the B12 would go 7-3 at worst and probably 9-1.

Sounds like you were part of the group that bet $$$ and took Baylor -17 vs UCF in the BCS Bowl.

Congrats

Nope, but I don't confuse the outcome of one game with what a team could do across a full season. Example, wvu wins the Big East and destroys Clemson in the Orange. Bowl. Next season, with their QB and 2 first round WRs back, along with most of their team, they start 5-0 but then break down playing week in and week out against the Big 12.

Have a great game against a big opponent in a big game, especially when the other team views you as beneath them, is a great story, but it's not the same as beating quality teams week after week after week.

Dude (banker) are you lost? This is the same guy who gave ECU, Tulsa, and Tulane members hell their last year on Cusa board. He and his buddy MuWho attacked all of us daily. These two are Marshall rejects who try win games on paper but still have NOT won a male championship in any sports its 9 years of Cusa play. Now it is our turn........go away as you use to tell us, "this is not aak (AAC) board" but guess what.......now it is:) I encourage all AAC poster to avoid him........he is truly an AAC hater.

(07-02-2014 07:43 AM)mufanatehc Wrote:  

(07-01-2014 09:19 AM)RobUCF Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 12:56 PM)mufanatehc Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 12:41 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  Hey Marsha fan.


9-0.

*drops the mic*

??

Let's see if you remember this one: 54-17

If he was trying to pull out the series record, he was wrong...

I think he was pulling out the last 9 games of the series.

(07-01-2014 09:19 AM)RobUCF Wrote:  

(06-30-2014 12:56 PM)mufanatehc Wrote:  [quote='Knightsweat' pid='10871969' dateline='1404150088']
Hey Marsha fan.


9-0.

*drops the mic*

??

Let's see if you remember this one: 54-17
[/quote

Let's see if you remember entire history of play:
10 (ECU) - 5 (Marshall) overall .......now, who's your DADDY!
(Again, just go back to c-usa board......AAC left you behind!)

(06-29-2014 10:45 PM)banker Wrote:  

(06-28-2014 05:31 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 09:19 PM)banker Wrote:  His argument is apparently that the best AAC teams can beat mediocre B12 teams and the best B12 teams can beat mediocre AAC teams. The way to do it would be to list 1 vs 1 thru 10 vs 10. I would say the B12 would go 7-3 at worst and probably 9-1.

Sounds like you were part of the group that bet $$$ and took Baylor -17 vs UCF in the BCS Bowl.

Congrats

Nope, but I don't confuse the outcome of one game with what a team could do across a full season. Example, wvu wins the Big East and destroys Clemson in the Orange. Bowl. Next season, with their QB and 2 first round WRs back, along with most of their team, they start 5-0 but then break down playing week in and week out against the Big 12.

Have a great game against a big opponent in a big game, especially when the other team views you as beneath them, is a great story, but it's not the same as beating quality teams week after week after week.

Here is another high character guy that Doc has on your team. It was only his third arrest, so he may be back on the team pretty soon.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-s...01742.html

(06-29-2014 02:51 PM)Seminole Indian Wrote:  

(06-29-2014 02:34 PM)Tigersmoke Wrote:  Seminole Indian why oh why do you bottom of the barrel teams. In bottom of the barrel conferences keep coming to our board trying to convince us that we are all-in-one as far as the g5's go? The American is and has proven to be better than the other g4's. Lol

Don't think there is any doubt about that but I'm not really a Conference focused guy (last year the SBC was the top non-aq conference in football, and their teams got the BCS checks, and I think 2nd the year before), because going forward it is every school for themselves.

There are good football teams scattered through out the G5's, and bad ones. Every G5 Conference has both, and I can't wait to see which teams rise to the top of the G5 pack.

,

Hate to rain on your parade here whorn but every P5 has both too. With the money the P5's get, every team should be better year end year out than the G5's, but every team is not. There are bottom dwellers (Baylor was one for the first 14 years of the Big12, until Art Briles arrived) that are in EVERY conference.