tigertom
"Illegitimus Non Tatum Carborundum"
Posts: 20,481
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 312
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: USA & CO Dreaming
|
Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
|
|
06-09-2014 01:31 PM |
|
HeartOfDixie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
No
|
|
06-09-2014 01:37 PM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Only 18% say yes (w/ another 20% saying "it depends"). Once again, the tyranny of the minority.
|
|
06-09-2014 01:42 PM |
|
All Dukes_All Day
All American
Posts: 4,336
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 62
I Root For: JMU, Pitt
Location:
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
More importantly though, will China and India (you know, 1/3 of the world)? I have a hunch I know the answer.
|
|
06-09-2014 01:47 PM |
|
Doctor Krieger
1st String
Posts: 1,680
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 26
I Root For: :)
Location: Wiscompton
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
About the answer I'd expect from a business/public policy website.
|
|
06-09-2014 01:49 PM |
|
vandiver49
Heisman
Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Not in the manner by which they wish to accomplish said reductions.
|
|
06-09-2014 01:53 PM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,758
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
|
|
06-09-2014 02:26 PM |
|
HeartOfDixie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
Missed the 80s and 2009 huh?
|
|
06-09-2014 02:30 PM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
Ahh, the auto industry is all rainbows and unicorns, huh commietommie. Meanwhile in the real world, the US is not the preferred place for the auto industry. I'm sure glad people like commietom allowed them to continue to exist. The evil auto companies.
|
|
06-09-2014 02:36 PM |
|
smn1256
I miss Tripster
Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
How much have those improvements added to the cost of a car? Not saying they're unneeded, but they add to the cost of the vehicle, the weight of the vehicle which reduces MPG, and takes away affordability from some people.
|
|
06-09-2014 02:44 PM |
|
vandiver49
Heisman
Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
Again, I'm not opposed to the reductions, but 'cap and trade' is asinine. Renewable Energy will never make up more than 20% of the nation's energy portfolio. I refuse to pay to assuage the First World guilt some people in this movement are motivated by. Acknowledge these points and I'm all in.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2014 02:56 PM by vandiver49.)
|
|
06-09-2014 02:52 PM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
(06-04-2014 04:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: I'm by no means a physicist or chemist. Of course I willingly admit that,
|
|
06-09-2014 02:53 PM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,758
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:52 PM)vandiver49 Wrote: (06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
Again, I'm not opposed to the reductions, but 'cap and trade' is asinine. Renewable Energy will never make up more than 20% of the nation's energy portfolio. I refuse to pay to assuage the First World guilt some people in this movement are motivated by. Acknowledge these points and I'm all in.
Boy...that's the kind of thinking we need.
|
|
06-09-2014 03:55 PM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,758
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:53 PM)DrTorch Wrote: (06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
(06-04-2014 04:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: I'm by no means a physicist or chemist. Of course I willingly admit that,
Nice story bro.
|
|
06-09-2014 03:57 PM |
|
vandiver49
Heisman
Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 03:55 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: (06-09-2014 02:52 PM)vandiver49 Wrote: (06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
Again, I'm not opposed to the reductions, but 'cap and trade' is asinine. Renewable Energy will never make up more than 20% of the nation's energy portfolio. I refuse to pay to assuage the First World guilt some people in this movement are motivated by. Acknowledge these points and I'm all in.
Boy...that's the kind of thinking we need.
Dont get mad at me, take out your frustration with the Laws of Thermodynamics.
|
|
06-09-2014 04:40 PM |
|
QuestionSocratic
Banned
Posts: 8,276
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.
In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."
In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."
By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
I think that miracle might be called a government bailout.
|
|
06-09-2014 04:47 PM |
|
mptnstr@44
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,047
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 427
I Root For: Nati Bearcats
Location:
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
|
|
06-09-2014 07:10 PM |
|
THE NC Herd Fan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 16,168
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 521
I Root For: Marshall
Location: Charlotte
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
NO
|
|
06-09-2014 07:11 PM |
|
Fo Shizzle
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
NO..NO..NO..Fck NO.
|
|
06-09-2014 07:15 PM |
|
mptnstr@44
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,047
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 427
I Root For: Nati Bearcats
Location:
|
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Based on the poll results the majority says No too.
|
|
06-09-2014 09:07 PM |
|