Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Author Message
tigertom Offline
"Illegitimus Non Tatum Carborundum"
*

Posts: 20,481
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 312
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: USA & CO Dreaming

Donators
Post: #1
Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
http://www2.smartbrief.com/servlet/encod...04bf4c943b


Take the poll and see the results.
06-09-2014 01:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #2
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
No
06-09-2014 01:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #3
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Only 18% say yes (w/ another 20% saying "it depends"). Once again, the tyranny of the minority.
06-09-2014 01:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
All Dukes_All Day Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,336
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 62
I Root For: JMU, Pitt
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
More importantly though, will China and India (you know, 1/3 of the world)? I have a hunch I know the answer.
06-09-2014 01:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Doctor Krieger Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,680
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 26
I Root For: :)
Location: Wiscompton
Post: #5
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
About the answer I'd expect from a business/public policy website.
06-09-2014 01:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #6
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Not in the manner by which they wish to accomplish said reductions.
06-09-2014 01:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,758
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #7
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.
06-09-2014 02:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #8
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

Missed the 80s and 2009 huh?
06-09-2014 02:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

Ahh, the auto industry is all rainbows and unicorns, huh commietommie. Meanwhile in the real world, the US is not the preferred place for the auto industry. I'm sure glad people like commietom allowed them to continue to exist. The evil auto companies.
06-09-2014 02:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #10
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

How much have those improvements added to the cost of a car? Not saying they're unneeded, but they add to the cost of the vehicle, the weight of the vehicle which reduces MPG, and takes away affordability from some people.
06-09-2014 02:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #11
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

Again, I'm not opposed to the reductions, but 'cap and trade' is asinine. Renewable Energy will never make up more than 20% of the nation's energy portfolio. I refuse to pay to assuage the First World guilt some people in this movement are motivated by. Acknowledge these points and I'm all in.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2014 02:56 PM by vandiver49.)
06-09-2014 02:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #12
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

(06-04-2014 04:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm by no means a physicist or chemist. Of course I willingly admit that,
06-09-2014 02:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,758
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #13
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:52 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

Again, I'm not opposed to the reductions, but 'cap and trade' is asinine. Renewable Energy will never make up more than 20% of the nation's energy portfolio. I refuse to pay to assuage the First World guilt some people in this movement are motivated by. Acknowledge these points and I'm all in.

Boy...that's the kind of thinking we need. 03-zzz
06-09-2014 03:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,758
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 980
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #14
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:53 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

(06-04-2014 04:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm by no means a physicist or chemist. Of course I willingly admit that,

Nice story bro.
06-09-2014 03:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #15
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 03:55 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(06-09-2014 02:52 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

Again, I'm not opposed to the reductions, but 'cap and trade' is asinine. Renewable Energy will never make up more than 20% of the nation's energy portfolio. I refuse to pay to assuage the First World guilt some people in this movement are motivated by. Acknowledge these points and I'm all in.

Boy...that's the kind of thinking we need. 03-zzz

Dont get mad at me, take out your frustration with the Laws of Thermodynamics.
06-09-2014 04:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
QuestionSocratic Offline
Banned

Posts: 8,276
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 02:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Henry Ford II whined that seatbelts, headrests and turn signals would "close down" the auto industry.

In 1971, Lee Iacocca said "And you can see that safety has really killed all of our business.... We're not only frustrated, but, uh, we've reached the despair point....Shoulder harnesses and headrests are a complete waste of money."

In 1972, General Motors executive Ernest S. Starkman testifying against proposed emissions standards said, "It is conceivable that complete stoppage of the entire production could occur, with the obvious tremendous loss to company shareholders, employees, suppliers and communities."

By some miracle, the auto industry survived.

I think that miracle might be called a government bailout.
06-09-2014 04:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


mptnstr@44 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,047
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 427
I Root For: Nati Bearcats
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
(06-09-2014 01:31 PM)tigertom Wrote:  http://www2.smartbrief.com/servlet/encod...04bf4c943b


Take the poll and see the results.

No. It's stupid.
06-09-2014 07:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
THE NC Herd Fan Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,168
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 521
I Root For: Marshall
Location: Charlotte
Post: #18
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
NO
06-09-2014 07:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #19
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
NO..NO..NO..Fck NO.
06-09-2014 07:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mptnstr@44 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,047
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 427
I Root For: Nati Bearcats
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Are you willing to pay higher costs for carbon reduction?
Based on the poll results the majority says No too.
06-09-2014 09:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.