(06-04-2014 06:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  we are doomed if oleary is our spokesman on ethics

Weak.

(06-04-2014 07:15 PM)Knightshift Wrote:  

(06-04-2014 06:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  we are doomed if oleary is our spokesman on ethics

Weak.

Is the "Improper use of a John Belushi image" flag a 5, 10, or 15 yard penalty?

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(06-04-2014 12:13 PM)bearcatfan Wrote:  I'm liking O'Leary more every day.

"They sound like the South during the Civil War," O'Leary said. "If they don't get their way, they're going to secede and start their own country … I think college football is in real trouble."

"The thing that's disturbing is that college football has been fighting for years to create a level playing field and now they're trying to go the other way and create an even wider gap between the haves and have-nots," O'Leary added. "I think some of these schools have forgotten where they came from."

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...-civil-war

Now most of the P5 will boycott scheduling games with UCF, !Brilliant move motor mouth!

(06-04-2014 07:55 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  

(06-04-2014 12:13 PM)bearcatfan Wrote:  I'm liking O'Leary more every day.

"They sound like the South during the Civil War," O'Leary said. "If they don't get their way, they're going to secede and start their own country … I think college football is in real trouble."

"The thing that's disturbing is that college football has been fighting for years to create a level playing field and now they're trying to go the other way and create an even wider gap between the haves and have-nots," O'Leary added. "I think some of these schools have forgotten where they came from."

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...-civil-war

Now most of the P5 will boycott scheduling games with UCF, !Brilliant move motor mouth!

That is not going to happen. UCF sits in the middle of one of the best recruiting areas in the country. Do you really think a program that recruits Florida would turn down a chance for their recruits to play in front of their families? I just don't see that happening.
CJ

(06-04-2014 07:59 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(06-04-2014 07:55 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  

(06-04-2014 12:13 PM)bearcatfan Wrote:  I'm liking O'Leary more every day.

"They sound like the South during the Civil War," O'Leary said. "If they don't get their way, they're going to secede and start their own country … I think college football is in real trouble."

"The thing that's disturbing is that college football has been fighting for years to create a level playing field and now they're trying to go the other way and create an even wider gap between the haves and have-nots," O'Leary added. "I think some of these schools have forgotten where they came from."

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...-civil-war

Now most of the P5 will boycott scheduling games with UCF, !Brilliant move motor mouth!

That is not going to happen. UCF sits in the middle of one of the best recruiting areas in the country. Do you really think a program that recruits Florida would turn down a chance for their recruits to play in front of their families? I just don't see that happening.
CJ

Sure it will, Florida is not going to help make the UCF football program liginamite! Just like it took the Kentucky State Government to make UK play us!

(06-04-2014 07:55 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  

(06-04-2014 12:13 PM)bearcatfan Wrote:  I'm liking O'Leary more every day.

"They sound like the South during the Civil War," O'Leary said. "If they don't get their way, they're going to secede and start their own country … I think college football is in real trouble."

"The thing that's disturbing is that college football has been fighting for years to create a level playing field and now they're trying to go the other way and create an even wider gap between the haves and have-nots," O'Leary added. "I think some of these schools have forgotten where they came from."

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...-civil-war

Now most of the P5 will boycott scheduling games with UCF, !Brilliant move motor mouth!

As if they weren't already scared of UCF after the Fiesta Bowl blowout.

Fire O'Leary before he has the NCAA snooping around Orlando.

(06-04-2014 06:55 PM)Pirate1 Wrote:  No mention that the big power grab coincides with the new mega millions playoff either... all for us(P5)...none for you (g5)

Actually, the G5 conferences are going to get much more money under the CFP than they have ever gotten under any prior system.

(06-04-2014 07:55 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  

(06-04-2014 12:13 PM)bearcatfan Wrote:  I'm liking O'Leary more every day.

"They sound like the South during the Civil War," O'Leary said. "If they don't get their way, they're going to secede and start their own country … I think college football is in real trouble."

"The thing that's disturbing is that college football has been fighting for years to create a level playing field and now they're trying to go the other way and create an even wider gap between the haves and have-nots," O'Leary added. "I think some of these schools have forgotten where they came from."

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...-civil-war

Now most of the P5 will boycott scheduling games with UCF, !Brilliant move motor mouth!

Just as predicted...the knee pad sympathizer shows up to talking out of his A$$.

ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, etc...probably agreed with much of what GOL said...as those conf don't want to leave the NCAA...something SEC Commish has threatened to do.

You, wait. They avoided Louisville, UCF is a thread to rock their boat also.

(06-04-2014 10:10 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  You, wait. They avoided Louisville, UCF is a thread to rock their boat also.

Dude...many P5 teams have already been dodging UCF, well before GOL's comments. (Heck, KSU bought out their return game at UCF because they knew they were lucky to beat UCF at home in the closing seconds of that game). Most P5 teams aren't as good as South Carolina...and they obviously don't want to schedule a tough road non-conf game if they can avoid it (hence other teams scheduling games vs FIU, FAU, and USF instead).

That's why your previous post was BS.

He's got the mic right now due to last season's success. You go and use it George.



St-oo-dent Ath-oo-leets? Ohhh... That is brilliant, sir!

I'm still stunned that even insiders like O'Leary aren't paying attention to what is really going on.

The threat to make a new division has nothing to do with the G% and those outside it. The council has already capitulated to cost-of-attendance thresholds.

This whole controversy is about voting thresholds INSIDE the P5. Has nothing to do with those outside.

In other words, the fighting here is between P5 conferences, like the Pac12/B1G against the SEC.

I'd like to see the narrative change to reflect that point.

(06-05-2014 08:09 AM)upstater1 Wrote:  I'm still stunned that even insiders like O'Leary aren't paying attention to what is really going on.

The threat to make a new division has nothing to do with the G% and those outside it. The council has already capitulated to cost-of-attendance thresholds.

This whole controversy is about voting thresholds INSIDE the P5. Has nothing to do with those outside.

In other words, the fighting here is between P5 conferences, like the Pac12/B1G against the SEC.

Did you hear GOL call out the Pac-12 Commish?

Did you hear GOL call out the Big Ten Commish?

No...you heard him call out the SEC Commish.

Dang...even posters can't even follow what is actually said.

Nobody hates the SEC more than I do, but the yankee bias in O'Leary's statement was ignorant and uncalled for.

(06-05-2014 08:37 AM)Gray Avenger Wrote:  Nobody hates the SEC more than I do, but the yankee bias in O'Leary's statement was ignorant and uncalled for.

Yeah...one shouldn't DARE call out the SEC's desire to SECEDE from their collective Union (NCAA) with specific threats.

Guess GOL should have done what everyone else does when SEC makes threat...."don't say a word and cuddle with fear".

(06-05-2014 08:09 AM)upstater1 Wrote:  I'm still stunned that even insiders like O'Leary aren't paying attention to what is really going on.

The threat to make a new division has nothing to do with the G% and those outside it. The council has already capitulated to cost-of-attendance thresholds.

This whole controversy is about voting thresholds INSIDE the P5. Has nothing to do with those outside.

In other words, the fighting here is between P5 conferences, like the Pac12/B1G against the SEC.

Disagree. I bet Slive is pretty much speaking for the P5. So far, nothing, even cost of attendance, has been formally agreed to by anyone. Slive is putting pressure on the non-P5 to do just that.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(06-05-2014 08:23 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(06-05-2014 08:09 AM)upstater1 Wrote:  I'm still stunned that even insiders like O'Leary aren't paying attention to what is really going on.

The threat to make a new division has nothing to do with the G% and those outside it. The council has already capitulated to cost-of-attendance thresholds.

This whole controversy is about voting thresholds INSIDE the P5. Has nothing to do with those outside.

In other words, the fighting here is between P5 conferences, like the Pac12/B1G against the SEC.

Did you hear GOL call out the Pac-12 Commish?

Did you hear GOL call out the Big Ten Commish?

No...you heard him call out the SEC Commish.

Dang...even posters can't even follow what is actually said.

The SEC Commish is the only one who made that threat--directed at the P5.

People can't follow what is going on.

(06-05-2014 08:49 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(06-05-2014 08:09 AM)upstater1 Wrote:  I'm still stunned that even insiders like O'Leary aren't paying attention to what is really going on.

The threat to make a new division has nothing to do with the G% and those outside it. The council has already capitulated to cost-of-attendance thresholds.

This whole controversy is about voting thresholds INSIDE the P5. Has nothing to do with those outside.

In other words, the fighting here is between P5 conferences, like the Pac12/B1G against the SEC.

Disagree. I bet Slive is pretty much speaking for the P5. So far, nothing, even cost of attendance, has been formally agreed to by anyone. Slive is putting pressure on the non-P5 to do just that.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

How can you possibly disagree with this when the particulars of ths argument are about voting thresholds in the P5.

People are simply not paying attention to what is going on. Read the articles. It's in there. Why in the world would the G5 really care whether it takes 39 or 43 P5 teams to pass rules?