Is it even possible for this b#tch to tell the truth? Benghazi was bad enough, but now she tells a whopper about the America hating deserter Obama just swapped five high level terrorists for.

I'm thinking I'll withhold judgement until all the facts come out and I admit upfront that I haven't followed this story closely enough to know what the real story is.

(06-03-2014 08:31 AM)Crebman Wrote:  I'm thinking I'll withhold judgement until all the facts come out and I admit upfront that I haven't followed this story closely enough to know what the real story is.

I suggest you do some reading and it won't take long to see this soldier didn't serve with any honor and dignity. In fact he was a deserter and an aid to the enemy.

(06-03-2014 09:09 AM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 08:31 AM)Crebman Wrote:  I'm thinking I'll withhold judgement until all the facts come out and I admit upfront that I haven't followed this story closely enough to know what the real story is.

I suggest you do some reading and it won't take long to see this soldier didn't serve with any honor and dignity. In fact he was a deserter and an aid to the enemy.

I'm sure they honestly thought this when they made the trade.

it was their fundamental inability to understand "normal americans" (as opposed to the elite thinkers on the left) that led them to think that trading 5 murdering terrorists that are guilty of crimes against humanity for a single deserter than collaborated with the enemy would be a good thing.

(06-03-2014 02:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 09:09 AM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 08:31 AM)Crebman Wrote:  I'm thinking I'll withhold judgement until all the facts come out and I admit upfront that I haven't followed this story closely enough to know what the real story is.

I suggest you do some reading and it won't take long to see this soldier didn't serve with any honor and dignity. In fact he was a deserter and an aid to the enemy.

I'm sure they honestly thought this when they made the trade.

it was their fundamental inability to understand "normal americans" (as opposed to the elite thinkers on the left) that led them to think that trading 5 murdering terrorists that are guilty of crimes against humanity for a single deserter than collaborated with the enemy would be a good thing.

Of course Obama thought it was a good thing - he invited the Taliban parents to the White House.

after watching the staggering stupidity on the prisoner "trade", I will admit that now, I think it may actually be possible that these gigantic retards really and truly thought that chris stevens was killed by a movie critic.

(06-03-2014 02:20 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 02:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 09:09 AM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 08:31 AM)Crebman Wrote:  I'm thinking I'll withhold judgement until all the facts come out and I admit upfront that I haven't followed this story closely enough to know what the real story is.

I suggest you do some reading and it won't take long to see this soldier didn't serve with any honor and dignity. In fact he was a deserter and an aid to the enemy.

I'm sure they honestly thought this when they made the trade.

it was their fundamental inability to understand "normal americans" (as opposed to the elite thinkers on the left) that led them to think that trading 5 murdering terrorists that are guilty of crimes against humanity for a single deserter than collaborated with the enemy would be a good thing.

Of course Obama thought it was a good thing - he invited the Taliban parents to the White House.

exactly. he played the crap up, obviously oblivious to the fact that this was going to be universally condemned.

Susan Rice + Sunday morning shows = Big Lie

It absolutely amazes me that this Rice person would allow herself to be completely and utterly embarrassed and hung out to dry, yet again, on almost the exact same kind of outright lie that she propagated the last time she went out flapping her gums.

It's astounding. She's either incredibly loyal and doesn't care, a very useful idiot, or a complete moron that gets laughed at behind her back as she takes her talking points and dutifully leads herself to yet another slaughter.

Psssst, Ben? Watch this! I'm gonna send Susan out again this week, with, look at this.... Yea, yea, no schit. Really. Lets go tune in Faze the Nation, this one oughta be great! Hahahahahahahahahaha.

Good God, talk about NO credibility left at all. No dignity either. Who would invite her back on and why?

(06-03-2014 02:39 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  It absolutely amazes me that this Rice person would allow herself to be completely and utterly embarrassed and hung out to dry, yet again, on almost the exact same kind of outright lie that she propagated the last time she went out flapping her gums.

It's astounding. She's either incredibly loyal and doesn't care, a very useful idiot, or a complete moron that gets laughed at behind her back as she takes her talking points and dutifully leads herself to yet another slaughter.

Psssst, Ben? Watch this! I'm gonna send Susan out again this week, with, look at this.... Yea, yea, no schit. Really. Lets go tune in Faze the Nation, this one oughta be great! Hahahahahahahahahaha.

Good God, talk about NO credibility left at all. No dignity either. Who would invite her back on and why?

I'm beginning to think that they really believe the sh!t that comes out of their mouths. observable reality is subordinate to their political doctrine, and when in conflict, they always go with doctrine.

Terrorists could nuke Manhattan and Susan Rice would say we are not sure if this was a terrorist act, it might have
been a meteorite strike, and at least Philly is OK.

(06-03-2014 02:22 PM)EagleX Wrote:  after watching the staggering stupidity on the prisoner "trade", I will admit that now, I think it may actually be possible that these gigantic retards really and truly thought that chris stevens was killed by a movie critic.

Best and brightest, amirite?

(06-03-2014 02:23 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 02:20 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 02:18 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 09:09 AM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(06-03-2014 08:31 AM)Crebman Wrote:  I'm thinking I'll withhold judgement until all the facts come out and I admit upfront that I haven't followed this story closely enough to know what the real story is.

I suggest you do some reading and it won't take long to see this soldier didn't serve with any honor and dignity. In fact he was a deserter and an aid to the enemy.

I'm sure they honestly thought this when they made the trade.

it was their fundamental inability to understand "normal americans" (as opposed to the elite thinkers on the left) that led them to think that trading 5 murdering terrorists that are guilty of crimes against humanity for a single deserter than collaborated with the enemy would be a good thing.

Of course Obama thought it was a good thing - he invited the Taliban parents to the White House.

exactly. he played the crap up, obviously oblivious to the fact that this was going to be universally condemned.

Obama will probably use his old stand by excuse - no one told him about it and learned about the swap on the news.

She needs to run for vice president with Hillary.

(06-03-2014 05:24 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  She needs to run for vice president with Hillary.

She's auditioning to replace Jay Carney.

Rice Compares Her Comments On Bergdahl To Benghazi Talking Points: “I Provided Best Information” We Had, “Doesn’t Make Me A Liar”…



Actually, you are a liar, in both instances you knew what you were saying wasn’t true. Bergdahl didn’t serve with “honor and distinction” and Benghazi had nothing to do with a YouTube video. So yes, you are a lying $@#!$.

Quote:It hasn’t been an easy week for Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser.

A day after the Obama administration completed the exchange of five Taliban operatives for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the only U.S. service member held in captivity during the Afghan war, she said that the soldier had served with “honor and distinction.” That, despite a body of evidence suggesting Bergdahl had walked off his military outpost in eastern Afghanistan on June 30, 2009, raising the prospect that he went absent without leave or deserted his position. Both are crimes in the military. [...]

Asked Friday about her past comments on Benghazi, Rice did not shy away from comparing the two controversies.

“Similarly with Benghazi, as has been recounted on many occasions, I provided the best information that the U.S. government had at the time,” she said. “Parts of it turned out to be wrong. I regret that the information I was provided was wrong and that I delivered to the American people. That doesn’t make me a liar. That makes me a public servant trying to say what we knew at the time and when I gave that information I caveated it and noted that it was what we knew then and there, but it could well change.”

If Rice was not aware of Bergdahl’s past last weekend, however, it isn’t because questions about him had not arisen bef

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/check...-reaction/