(05-22-2014 10:22 AM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote: If the ACC could guarantee us that our annual rivals would be Virginia Tech, Miami and Syracuse, then I'd be all for the division-less set up. Unfortunately, that doesn't appear to be a part of their plan so our vote remains to retain the current set up.
I think the no-division mock-up plans by fans have been far more favorable to Pitt than SU.
SU's three partners mentioned the most are Pitt, BC, and Louisville.
But I'm open to that as long as there is balance (or should I say common sense) in dividing up the 5/5
First 5 for two years - FSU, GT, VT, NCST, Duke
Second 5 next two years - Miami, Clemson, UVa, UNC, Wake
Then just make sure Duke and Wake are away the year we get BC at home and an attractive conference home schedule can be something like:
Pitt, BC, FSU, NCST
Louisville, VT, GT, Duke
Pitt, BC, Miami, UNC
Louisville, Clemson, UVa, Wake
As the old saying goes, "make lemonade".
If you think long and hard about it, I'm sure you can come up with a similar scenario for Pitt without having to insist upon Miami, VT, and SU as your permanent partners.
Cheers,
Neil