Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
No expansion for the Sunbelt
Author Message
MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,850
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 179
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #1
No expansion for the Sunbelt
http://sunbeltsports.org/news/2014/5/21/...45658.aspx

Staying at 11/11.

Interesting no full invite for NMSU.
05-21-2014 12:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


USM@FTL Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,640
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 68
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Post: #2
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
So UMass is going to be Indy.
05-21-2014 12:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Online
Legend
*

Posts: 46,401
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 740
I Root For: Sports
Location:
Post: #3
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
not a surprise at all about NMSU not getting full invite. the eastern schools I don't think want any part of that at all.
05-21-2014 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NBPirate Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,704
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 188
I Root For: Georgetown
Location: The Hilltop
Post: #4
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
UMass going back to FCS?
05-21-2014 12:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
swampbear Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,511
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 31
I Root For: Louisiana
Location: Missouri City, TX.
Post: #5
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
(05-21-2014 12:51 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  UMass going back to FCS?

UMASS has 2 years left, I believe in the MAC. If that is correct they can certainly be invited during that time frame
05-21-2014 01:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SlyFox Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,784
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 120
I Root For: Liberty
Location: Lake Conroe, Texas
Post: #6
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
Should there be any movement there likely will be some backfill opportunities down the road. As a Liberty alum, I am disappointed that the SBC didn't make the move. All they did was prolong a process and gamble that they don't suddenly need to add schools in the next 12 months should some of their members bolt for greener pastures or that the final CCG deregulation reads the way they are hoping.
05-21-2014 01:08 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


arkstfan Away
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 25,850
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 986
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #7
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
Of course there are schools the Sun Belt has said no thanks to right now that might be called should there be a defection.

But no body chooses to go home with the ugly girl at 9:30 for fear that there will be nothing left but ugly girls to choose from at 2am.
05-21-2014 01:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SlyFox Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,784
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 120
I Root For: Liberty
Location: Lake Conroe, Texas
Post: #8
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
Not arguing that point. But it doesn't mean that there couldn't be regret for today's inaction in the near future.

We continue to wear you guys down with our availability.
05-21-2014 01:26 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Saint3333 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,421
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 854
I Root For: App State
Location:
Post: #9
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
If they need to add schools they'll still be there. How is that gambling?
05-21-2014 01:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SlyFox Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,784
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 120
I Root For: Liberty
Location: Lake Conroe, Texas
Post: #10
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
Potential gap years
05-21-2014 01:27 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HP-TBDPITL Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,495
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 82
I Root For: College Sports
Location:
Post: #11
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
I think it's just a wait and see game...UMass isn't available for 2 years, so there is no reason to do anything now.

Once the existing expansions come to fruition in July for next season and UMass is closer to leaving the MAC, the Sun Belt will re-evaluate.

Plus UMass was terrible last year. Maybe they can win 6 or 7 games this season and make a move look better for the SBC.
(This post was last modified: 05-21-2014 01:31 PM by HP-TBDPITL.)
05-21-2014 01:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


IceJus10 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,152
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 90
I Root For: Sports
Location: New York
Post: #12
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
Ummmm this doesn't mean no expansion for the Sunbelt... it merely says that the conference won't be gaining or losing members on July 1st. Because it will have lost a member on June 30th and the UMass entry isn't complete yet... LOL In fact, it alludes to more change ahead:

"While we may explore adding a 12th all-sports member join the Sun Belt Conference, at this time we are moving the conference forward with our membership as is," said Sun Belt Conference Commissioner Karl Benson. "Come July 1 the membership will be stable for the first time in over two years with no incoming or departing members. The makeup of that 11 all-sports conference will give us more than just stability - it will give us strength and opportunity."
05-21-2014 01:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Seminole Indian Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,418
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Texas
Location:
Post: #13
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
(05-21-2014 01:29 PM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  I think it's just a wait and see game...UMass isn't available for 2 years, so there is no reason to do anything now.

Once the existing expansions come to fruition in July for next season and UMass is closer to leaving the MAC, the Sun Belt will re-evaluate.

Plus UMass was terrible last year. Maybe they can win 6 or 7 games this season and make a move look better for the SBC.
Probably not one of the reasons they are standing pat, but the SBC was the top non-aq league last year and 2nd the year before.

Granted it would not have happened if CUSA had not taken the bottom feeders off their hands, but they appear (as evidenced by adding AppSt and GaSo) to be serious about playing good football. To that end it appears to be a good move.

With the AAC joining the G5 this year, the competition to be the best G5 football league got tougher.
(This post was last modified: 05-21-2014 01:55 PM by Seminole Indian.)
05-21-2014 01:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Saint3333 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,421
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 854
I Root For: App State
Location:
Post: #14
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
(05-21-2014 01:27 PM)SlyFox Wrote:  Potential gap years

The risk of that is not mitigated by adding one school. The likelihood of a conference taking four members is remote. Good try Liberty. It is going to take a HUGE shakeup before you guys are invited though. By that time other programs may have stepped up.
05-21-2014 02:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
perimeterpost Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,977
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 132
I Root For: OHIO
Location:
Post: #15
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
if I remember correctly, once UMass rejects the MAC's offer for full membership the agreement moves towards termination after 2 years but if UMass chooses to leave sooner an early exit penalty would be involved. So even if SBC did invite UMass today they would not likely not begin membership until after the 2015 season.
05-21-2014 02:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rabonchild Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,339
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 52
I Root For: Charlotte
Location: Lex KY
Post: #16
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
I believe UMASS would go all sports to MAC or football to FCS before they would put their football in the Sunbelt.
05-21-2014 05:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


MJG Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,278
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 30
I Root For: U I , UMich, SC
Location: Myrtle Beach
Post: #17
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
(05-21-2014 05:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  I believe UMASS would go all sports to MAC or football to FCS before they would put their football in the Sunbelt.

Why would you believe that keeping basketball in the A10 made sense.

So an A10 and SBC combination is worse than MAC all-sports sorry U mass. Dropping back down is better A10 doesn't have football.
05-21-2014 05:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BruceMcF Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,177
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 785
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #18
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
(05-21-2014 01:29 PM)HP-TBDPITL Wrote:  I think it's just a wait and see game...UMass isn't available for 2 years, so there is no reason to do anything now.
(05-21-2014 02:22 PM)perimeterpost Wrote:  if I remember correctly, once UMass rejects the MAC's offer for full membership the agreement moves towards termination after 2 years but if UMass chooses to leave sooner an early exit penalty would be involved. So even if SBC did invite UMass today they would not likely not begin membership until after the 2015 season.

Of course UMass would have been available for 2015 if asked ... they would have had to pay $250,000 exit fee to the MAC, but that's just a fraction of what they would save over four years from not trying to play as an independent.

(05-21-2014 01:52 PM)IceJus10 Wrote:  Ummmm this doesn't mean no expansion for the Sunbelt... it merely says that the conference won't be gaining or losing members on July 1st. Because it will have lost a member on June 30th and the UMass entry isn't complete yet...
Yes, the Sunbelt could decide later this year to take UMass for an expansion in 2015 ~ possibly depending on how the CCG deregulation proposal is worded ~ or this time next year for 2016.

(05-21-2014 05:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  I believe UMASS would go all sports to MAC or football to FCS before they would put their football in the Sunbelt.
Go ahead and believe it, but it was UMass who decided not to use their option to join the MAC all-sports and UMass who contacted the Sunbelt to see if the 12th spot was available FB-only.
(This post was last modified: 05-21-2014 06:49 PM by BruceMcF.)
05-21-2014 06:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kittonhead Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: Beat Matisse
Location:
Post: #19
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
(05-21-2014 01:52 PM)IceJus10 Wrote:  Ummmm this doesn't mean no expansion for the Sunbelt... it merely says that the conference won't be gaining or losing members on July 1st. Because it will have lost a member on June 30th and the UMass entry isn't complete yet... LOL In fact, it alludes to more change ahead:

"While we may explore adding a 12th all-sports member join the Sun Belt Conference, at this time we are moving the conference forward with our membership as is," said Sun Belt Conference Commissioner Karl Benson. "Come July 1 the membership will be stable for the first time in over two years with no incoming or departing members. The makeup of that 11 all-sports conference will give us more than just stability - it will give at us strength and opportunity."

It doesn't even say that.

All you can read from it is the SBC has definitely thrown in the towel for admitting an FCS school for 5/31/14 (mostly obvious with 10 days to go).

UMass is available at any date and can cleanly transition to the SBC football conference as late as February of 2016. They will have no scheduling commitment with another conference the day after the 2015 MAC regular season finishes. There isn't a lot of moving parts floating out there to prevent UMass being added if desired on short notice in early 2016.
05-21-2014 09:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Online
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,840
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2880
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #20
RE: No expansion for the Sunbelt
(05-21-2014 05:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  I believe UMASS would go all sports to MAC or football to FCS before they would put their football in the Sunbelt.

Wow. Clearly you are wrong. UMass contacted the Sunbelt--not the other way around.
05-21-2014 09:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.