(05-07-2014 11:02 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: Are there any Hindus in the Nevada state senate? If so then this was shockingly rude. If not, then then putting that man up there was itself an insult as it was nothing but a farce to prove some political point.
It was the United States Senate.
Regardless.
Btw, this happened more than 7 years ago.
Wait, is this right? 7 freaking years ago? And NOW these kids that were still watching Drake and Josh back then, are NOW gettin' panties all abunch?!? hahahaaha.
If that's true, then your leaders of the "professionally Ooofended" clearly fell down on the job. one talk. 7 years old. no pie in face. Consider it a victory kids!
(05-07-2014 11:02 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: Are there any Hindus in the Nevada state senate? If so then this was shockingly rude. If not, then then putting that man up there was itself an insult as it was nothing but a farce to prove some political point.
It was the United States Senate.
Regardless.
Btw, this happened more than 7 years ago.
Wait, is this right? 7 freaking years ago? And NOW these kids that were still watching Drake and Josh back then, are NOW gettin' panties all abunch?!? hahahaaha.
If that's true, then your leaders of the "professionally Ooofended" clearly fell down on the job. one talk. 7 years old. no pie in face. Consider it a victory kids!
You guys whine about Clinton. That was much longer ago than this.
(05-07-2014 10:30 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote: someone explain how this is "TYPICAL"... outside of the idiots at Westboro, please point me to the "typical" christian protests..
YOU get one group of idiots and then run with the "crazy Christians" meme?
Not Westboro.
So you're saying that Hindu prayer should be allowed in Congress? Muslim prayer? Buddhist prayer?
Personally, I would say no.. unless there's a Hindu serving, or a Muslim serving, or a buddhist, etc.
I disagree with smitty, who says he doesn't see a reason for any prayer. But I wouldn't discriminate against a religious beliver that wants their prayer heard.
But that wasn't my point, math. Again, my point is that you've got one group with loud protests and you went with the "Typical" comment.
Yet, that seems to be what you all do to Liberals.
"Hey, this one liberal did this bad thing! That must mean ALL liberals support it!"
(05-07-2014 11:02 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: Are there any Hindus in the Nevada state senate? If so then this was shockingly rude. If not, then then putting that man up there was itself an insult as it was nothing but a farce to prove some political point.
It was the United States Senate.
Regardless.
Btw, this happened more than 7 years ago.
Wait, is this right? 7 freaking years ago? And NOW these kids that were still watching Drake and Josh back then, are NOW gettin' panties all abunch?!? hahahaaha.
If that's true, then your leaders of the "professionally Ooofended" clearly fell down on the job. one talk. 7 years old. no pie in face. Consider it a victory kids!
You guys whine about Clinton. That was much longer ago than this.
Really, Mapenisis2? Who whines about a Clinton, not named Killary or cankles?
I'd take slicky-boy and his misogyny over this collection of amateur clowns any day of the week. He, at least, had run something before embarassing the entire nation and being impeached and disbarred. But, go for it! Hang your hat on that icon of virtue. hahahahahahhaaha.
(05-07-2014 11:04 PM)mathenis89 Wrote: It was the United States Senate.
Regardless.
Btw, this happened more than 7 years ago.
Wait, is this right? 7 freaking years ago? And NOW these kids that were still watching Drake and Josh back then, are NOW gettin' panties all abunch?!? hahahaaha.
If that's true, then your leaders of the "professionally Ooofended" clearly fell down on the job. one talk. 7 years old. no pie in face. Consider it a victory kids!
You guys whine about Clinton. That was much longer ago than this.
Really, Mapenisis2? Who whines about a Clinton, not named Killary or cankles?
I criticize Clinton. There is much to criticize him for.
But what I find interesting is that what is labeled as "typical" is actually a very atypical action that occurred some years ago. And even at that, it's open to further discussion.
Yet these young lion neo-atheists are so pathetically incapable when it comes to actual critical thought, that they simply throw out nonsense as if it was profound. And to them it is.
(05-07-2014 10:30 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote: someone explain how this is "TYPICAL"... outside of the idiots at Westboro, please point me to the "typical" christian protests..
YOU get one group of idiots and then run with the "crazy Christians" meme?
Sweeping generalizations: default setting of the intellectually lazy and/or stupid.
Quote:Other Christians, on the other hand, including Christian senators, expressed their approval of the event. They say even though the content may not be agreeable, it reflects the right to free speech in the government body. Christian supporters, therefore, were unhappy with the reactions of the three protestors, and concerned that their actions against the meeting could discourage the government from wanting to retain its long tradition of prayer.
I love watching you idiot liberals make fools out of yourselves. You're very good at it
(05-07-2014 10:23 PM)john01992 Wrote: reminds me of conservatives and their unconditional support for gun rights, gun owners, gun stores
except if said gun store wants to sell smart guns..........
I like you and all, but do you realize how stupid what you just said sounds? Don't fall in mathenis's trap, he's a mildly retarded troll. You DON'T want to be in his crew.
(05-07-2014 10:30 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote: someone explain how this is "TYPICAL"... outside of the idiots at Westboro, please point me to the "typical" christian protests..
YOU get one group of idiots and then run with the "crazy Christians" meme?
That's because it's typical of him. Therefore anything he despises is typical of the party he loathes. I bet he doesn't even know why he hates Conservatives.
(05-07-2014 11:02 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: Are there any Hindus in the Nevada state senate? If so then this was shockingly rude. If not, then then putting that man up there was itself an insult as it was nothing but a farce to prove some political point.
It was the United States Senate.
Regardless.
Btw, this happened more than 7 years ago.
Oh no, LMFAO, did that loser really go back 7 years to find this shiit and put "TYPICAL" before it??? BWAHAHAHAHAAH
(05-08-2014 12:38 AM)JDTulane Wrote: Once again, being an ******* is proven to be bipartisan.
No. No. Conservatives are the image of the Almighty God himself. Conservatives can do no wrong.
Clearly you're lost. We don't think we're God and we don't hate minorities like the retards like to say about us. We simply believe in earning what you get and we believe in family values. You know, REAL family values... Color doesn't matter.
(05-08-2014 09:03 AM)blunderbuss Wrote: To respond to the OP instead of slinging I personally have no problem with this guys prayer. Low class move by the idiot that interrupted.
There were three protesters and nobody supported their actions. mathenis is a drama queen failure.
I personally have no problem with this guys prayer. Low class move by the idiot that interrupted.
and nobody supported their actions. mathenis is a drama queen failure.