I would add BYU, Colorado State, New Mexico, and Wyoming.

North: BYU, Colorado State, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, West Virginia, Wyoming
South: Baylor, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas Christian, Texas Tech

(05-01-2014 03:10 PM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I would add BYU, Colorado State, New Mexico, and Wyoming.

North: BYU, Colorado State, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, West Virginia, Wyoming
South: Baylor, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas Christian, Texas Tech

Good thing you aren't the commissioner.

I would have had the conference title game at Jerry's World.

Just curious... Which team/conference do you root for?

(05-02-2014 02:40 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I would have had the conference title game at Jerry's World.

I'd have to say that is a good idea.

I live in Chico, CA. I cheer for Chico State in Division 2. My favorite Big 12 school is Texas because my uncle went there for grad school.

In the future, post all expansion related threads in the College Sports and Conference Realignment forum. If we can't generate traffic in here to discuss B12 sports, I'd rather see no traffic. The College Sports and Conference Realignment forum was created for discussions of this nature, and that's where they should take place.

(05-04-2014 10:31 AM)bitcruncher Wrote:  In the future, post all expansion related threads in the College Sports and Conference Realignment forum. If we can't generate traffic in here to discuss B12 sports, I'd rather see no traffic. The College Sports and Conference Realignment forum was created for discussions of this nature, and that's where they should take place.

I think we found the reason this board is dead.....

(05-04-2014 11:44 AM)Otacon Wrote:  

(05-04-2014 10:31 AM)bitcruncher Wrote:  In the future, post all expansion related threads in the College Sports and Conference Realignment forum. If we can't generate traffic in here to discuss B12 sports, I'd rather see no traffic. The College Sports and Conference Realignment forum was created for discussions of this nature, and that's where they should take place.

I think we found the reason this board is dead.....

If all you want to talk about is realignment, the CS&CR forum was created for that specific purpose. The forum that was specifically created for discussions about conference expansion is where all such discussions belong. You don't need to continue those conversations across every forum on the board. If you're going to do that, why create a forum for those discussions in the first place?

(05-05-2014 01:25 PM)bitcruncher Wrote:  

(05-04-2014 11:44 AM)Otacon Wrote:  

(05-04-2014 10:31 AM)bitcruncher Wrote:  In the future, post all expansion related threads in the College Sports and Conference Realignment forum. If we can't generate traffic in here to discuss B12 sports, I'd rather see no traffic. The College Sports and Conference Realignment forum was created for discussions of this nature, and that's where they should take place.

I think we found the reason this board is dead.....

If all you want to talk about is realignment, the CS&CR forum was created for that specific purpose. The forum that was specifically created for discussions about conference expansion is where all such discussions belong. You don't need to continue those conversations across every forum on the board. If you're going to do that, why create a forum for those discussions in the first place?

Otacon appears to be correct.

And logic has flown out the window.

(05-07-2014 03:27 PM)bitcruncher Wrote:  And logic has flown out the window.

This is kinda strange to me. The other thread about "Is WVU still happy in the B12. Isn't that also about conference realignment, at least indirectly. Yet that thread doesn't seem to bother you.

I too think Octagon is correct!

i'd add Rice, New mexico, USF, & UCF

Thank goodness you're not the B12 commissioner. Rice and New Mexico? Get real.

I would have at least 12 teams in it since it's called the Big 12 Conference.

Just so you know, the Big 12 also owns the rights to the name, "Big 16".

(06-08-2014 04:52 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I would have at least 12 teams in it since it's called the Big 12 Conference.

The Big Ten hasn't had 10 member for over a decade now. So I don't think the number in a conference name means anything any longer. If you can't handle it, that's your problem, not the B12's.

(06-08-2014 04:52 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I would have at least 12 teams in it since it's called the Big 12 Conference.

Spot on!!!!!!!!!!!

(06-08-2014 09:25 AM)USFRamenu Wrote:  Just so you know, the Big 12 also owns the rights to the name, "Big 16".

Who owns the name "Big 14"?

(06-08-2014 12:37 PM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  

(06-08-2014 09:25 AM)USFRamenu Wrote:  Just so you know, the Big 12 also owns the rights to the name, "Big 16".

Who owns the name "Big 14"?

To my knowledge that hasn't been pattented.