SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
Can the Federal Gov't Constitutionally Own Land Without a Legitimate Purpose For It?
Judge Nap on TX Land Battle: 'Pigheaded' BLM Telling Supreme Court to 'Take a Hike'
Quote:Describing the BLM as "pigheaded, bullheaded, arrogant, headstrong and unlawful," he said the executive branch is essentially telling the Supreme Court to "take a hike."
"A lot of commas, but you certainly drove your point home," Brian Kilmeade joked, asking why the BLM wants this "headache."
Napolitano answered by saying the BLM "has an insatiable lust for land," arguing there are still constitutional questions about whether the federal government can own land that doesn't appear to serve any legitimate purpose.
|
|
04-24-2014 11:03 AM |
|
Fitbud
Banned
Posts: 30,983
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
|
RE: Can the Federal Gov't Constitutionally Own Land Without a Legitimate Purpose For It?
The short answer is yes.
|
|
04-24-2014 11:04 AM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Can the Federal Gov't Constitutionally Own Land Without a Legitimate Purpose For It?
(04-24-2014 11:04 AM)Fitbud Wrote: The short answer is yes.
Maybe you should watch the video before you open your piehole.
|
|
04-24-2014 11:17 AM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Can the Federal Gov't Constitutionally Own Land Without a Legitimate Purpose For It?
|
|
04-24-2014 11:21 AM |
|