At issue are thousands of acres of land on the Texas side of the Red River, along the border between Texas and Oklahoma. Officials recently have raised concern that the BLM might be looking at claiming 90,000 acres of land as part of the public domain.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/...ma-border/

This isn't Dingy Harry territory. No way Texans let this happen.

Perry rips ‘out-of-control’ federal government over Texas land dispute

Civil War looms.

Agenda 21 is at hand.

(04-23-2014 09:16 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  This isn't Dingy Harry territory. No way Texans let this happen.

Perry rips ‘out-of-control’ federal government over Texas land dispute

Militia member says we are headed for armed conflict.

This isn't about the land. The feds sure as sh*t can't afford more land on their books to manage. This is about a test of power and anyone who can't see this for what it is is a moron. I don't care what your political leanings are.

Chant along with me: "Kelo, Kelo, Kelo."

(04-24-2014 08:02 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  Agenda 21 is at hand.

You didn't just really post this, did you?

(04-24-2014 08:48 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  This isn't about the land. The feds sure as sh*t can't afford more land on their books to manage. This is about a test of power and anyone who can't see this for what it is is a moron. I don't care what your political leanings are.

I hope it sets it off. The plan is to force rural residents into larger cities and to control their land for govt use.

(04-24-2014 09:23 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(04-24-2014 08:02 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  Agenda 21 is at hand.

You didn't just really post this, did you?

http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/...cation.pdf

(04-24-2014 09:23 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(04-24-2014 08:02 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  Agenda 21 is at hand.

You didn't just really post this, did you?

Nothing is impossible.

In so many words, the United Nations seeks to co-opt, via individual governments, and eventually, a “one-world government,” privately held land under the auspices of ensuring its “sustainability.” Worse still, the UN’s Agenda 21 has even laid out plans for “depopulation” or rather, “population control.” If it sounds like something out of George Orwell’s 1984, that is because Agenda 21′s tenets are eerily in line with the demented alternate reality Orwell himself had imagined while scribing the pages of his famed novel. Where one can live and what land should be designated for would, under fully-realized Agenda 21 plan, be controlled by a one-world government.

(04-24-2014 09:36 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-24-2014 09:23 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(04-24-2014 08:02 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  Agenda 21 is at hand.

You didn't just really post this, did you?

Nothing is impossible.

In so many words, the United Nations seeks to co-opt, via individual governments, and eventually, a “one-world government,” privately held land under the auspices of ensuring its “sustainability.” Worse still, the UN’s Agenda 21 has even laid out plans for “depopulation” or rather, “population control.” If it sounds like something out of George Orwell’s 1984, that is because Agenda 21′s tenets are eerily in line with the demented alternate reality Orwell himself had imagined while scribing the pages of his famed novel. Where one can live and what land should be designated for would, under fully-realized Agenda 21 plan, be controlled by a one-world government.

Forced March To The Cities
http://www.newgeography.com/content/0014...the-cities