(04-17-2014 07:45 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  I didn't read all 70+ posts so forgive me if I repeat something that's already been said. Here I go:

1. The ranchers were using land that was unused by anyone else and weren't destroying things - much unlike the Occupiers.

2. It's not costing the government a dime to secure, protect, or prevent crime on the land - much unlike the Occupiers.

3. There are no drugs on this land, or rapes, or destruction of property - much unlike the Occupiers.

4. If wild horses were on that land they'd be protected by the government, but cows not so much.

5. The ranchers pay federal taxes, shouldn't they be able to use federal land if no one else is using it as long as they don't damage anything?

6. There's a question about the land actually being federal land, it's been said it's really state land and the state doesn't give a crap.

7. If we're going to arrest trespassers then why don't we go after the 12 million illegal alien trespassers who commit murders, rapes, and other crimes as well as sucking up government resources?

8. I smell Reid in this. He's made several statements about the ranchers being wrong which surprised me because 1.) he's not backing up his constituents, 2.) he usually doesn't care about this sort of stuff, 3.) he can't blame the Koch brothers.

MONEY

(04-19-2014 09:03 AM)Paul M Wrote:  When guns are pointed at you it's appropriate to point back.

Only if you want to die says any law enforcement agency.

When they fire, it's appropriate to fire back.

(04-19-2014 09:16 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(04-17-2014 07:45 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  I didn't read all 70+ posts so forgive me if I repeat something that's already been said. Here I go:

1. The ranchers were using land that was unused by anyone else and weren't destroying things - much unlike the Occupiers.

2. It's not costing the government a dime to secure, protect, or prevent crime on the land - much unlike the Occupiers.

3. There are no drugs on this land, or rapes, or destruction of property - much unlike the Occupiers.

4. If wild horses were on that land they'd be protected by the government, but cows not so much.

5. The ranchers pay federal taxes, shouldn't they be able to use federal land if no one else is using it as long as they don't damage anything?

6. There's a question about the land actually being federal land, it's been said it's really state land and the state doesn't give a crap.

7. If we're going to arrest trespassers then why don't we go after the 12 million illegal alien trespassers who commit murders, rapes, and other crimes as well as sucking up government resources?

8. I smell Reid in this. He's made several statements about the ranchers being wrong which surprised me because 1.) he's not backing up his constituents, 2.) he usually doesn't care about this sort of stuff, 3.) he can't blame the Koch brothers.

MONEY

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/...ive-bribe/

Harry has his hands full right now:

Quote:Indicted Businessman Names Harry Reid as Alleged Recipient of Massive Bribe

(04-19-2014 10:42 AM)Paul M Wrote:  When they fire, it's appropriate to fire back.

Go ahead then. #rubyridge #waco

(04-20-2014 06:30 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(04-19-2014 10:42 AM)Paul M Wrote:  When they fire, it's appropriate to fire back.

Go ahead then. #rubyridge #waco

That would have already happened 20 years ago.

Those days are over because of the Internet and HD cell phone movies.

You can't just kill people when you no longer control the flow of news and information.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/...ive-bribe/

Harry has his hands full right now:

Quote:Indicted Businessman Names Harry Reid as Alleged Recipient of Massive Bribe

[/quote]


Well I hope something comes out of this and not another water on a ducks back scandal.

Sorry Ollie, but you've got one crooked business man trying to get some leniency. Tell him to back it up with some paperwork (or money in a freezer *hehe*) that ties this directly into Reid and then I'll believe what he says.

Guess those that stood at Lexington and Concord should have been hanged.
Those "traitors to the crown" became heroes.

(04-20-2014 10:42 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Sorry Ollie, but you've got one crooked business man trying to get some leniency. Tell him to back it up with some paperwork (or money in a freezer *hehe*) that ties this directly into Reid and then I'll believe what he says.

Then you will blow it off as "part of the game" whilst you hope to find some scandal on the other side of the isle...

(04-21-2014 08:10 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-20-2014 10:42 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  Sorry Ollie, but you've got one crooked business man trying to get some leniency. Tell him to back it up with some paperwork (or money in a freezer *hehe*) that ties this directly into Reid and then I'll believe what he says.

Then you will blow it off as "part of the game" whilst you hope to find some scandal on the other side of the isle...

Dude.. I'd rather not see any scandals on either side of the aisle. But why would I HOPE to find a scandal?

Hell dude, You know I cant' stand Dingy Harry. He is a contemptible, horrible individual who wants to be the "power behind the throne" and wants to ruin this country as long as he gets power (YES, I SAID IT). But find something more than a comment from a business man who said he did business with one aide...