(04-16-2014 07:52 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote: (04-16-2014 04:24 PM)Marge Schott Wrote: (04-16-2014 12:32 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote: (04-16-2014 12:22 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote: How do you guys feel about the likely 2014 ACC QBs?
Jameis Winston, Florida State (SO)
Marquise Williams, North Carolina (JR)
Anthony Boone, Duke (SR)
Cole Stoudt, Clemson (SR)
Chad Voytik, Pittsburgh (SO)
Will Gardner, Louisville (SO)
Jacoby Brissett, NC State (JR)
Terrel Hunt, Syracuse (JR)
Justin Thomas, Georgia Tech (SO)
Kevin Olsen, Miami (FR)
Tyler Murphy, Boston College (SR)
Michael Brewer, Virginia Tech (JR)
Greyson Lambert, Virginia (SO)
Tyler Cameron, Wake Forest (SO)
One headliner and then a veritable stampede of unknown to mediocre to below average.
True dat. Looks like a bunch of crap.
HARSH.
Actually, FSU's QB may be the backup - LINK.
I'm aware of the article. It's shoddy journalism, rehashing the same story and omitting some incredibly important details. But hey.
EDIT: There are close to 50 other universities being investigated over Title IX issues but they know the way to get tards to click their website is to write about the Heisman winner and national champion. For an author with multiple Pulitzers, there sure wasn't much groundbreaking information presented despite spending months in Tallahassee digging.
FSU released a statement about the article:
http://fsunytimes.fsu.edu/
A portion:
Quote:The university expresses its deep disappointment in today's New York Times story alleging FSU officials did not properly investigate a rape allegation against Jameis Winston "in apparent violation of federal law." It also vigorously objects to the newspaper's characterization of the university as being uncooperative in explaining its actions.
The university provided the newspaper with a general statement (below) and numerous written answers over a period of weeks. Most of the responses were left out of the story, giving readers an incorrect impression of the university's efforts on behalf of sexual assault victims under Title IX.
And lastly, just a refresher of some of the victim's claims:
1. She was blackout drunk - False, according to a blood alcohol screening that same night she was below the legal limit.
2. She was drugged - False, according to toxicology reports by the FL Dept. of Law Enforcement and a second test performed by a UF toxicologist.
3. She was hit in the head - Likely False, she never reported this to police or the attending nurse at the hospital.
-----------
4. She had two separate DNA matches on her person and refused to identify whom she thought/knew the 2nd set of DNA belonged.
5. Her examination as part of the rape kit indicated no tearing of the posterior fourchette (specific vaginal area), which if torn would be indicative of forced intercourse.
6. She never filed a complaint with FSU that would've led to an internal Title IX investigation, nor was Winston arrested or charged with a crime. (New info)
