FWIW Athlon's Rankings
http://athlonsports.com/college-football...aches-2014

LOLZ

BS!! Coker at #67? That barely puts him in the middle of the pack! L.C. and the UTSA coaching staff have brought UTSA from 'no football' to an FBS winning program in virtually the blink of an eye. I doubt anyone else could've brought us this far any faster. And this after nearly every football "expert" picked us to finish last in C-USA with a total of only 1 or 2 wins for the season at best. Guy simply doesn't get the recognition he deserves.

(04-10-2014 11:39 PM)Volkmar Wrote:  BS!! Coker at #67? That barely puts him in the middle of the pack! L.C. and the UTSA coaching staff have brought UTSA from 'no football' to an FBS winning program in virtually the blink of an eye. I doubt anyone else could've brought us this far any faster. And this after nearly every football "expert" picked us to finish last in C-USA with a total of only 1 or 2 wins for the season at best. Guy simply doesn't get the recognition he deserves.

Coker won a title at Miami, he's a good coach. Anyone worth two cents would be smart enough to recognize that and what he's done at UTSA.

(04-10-2014 11:39 PM)Volkmar Wrote:  BS!! Coker at #67? That barely puts him in the middle of the pack! L.C. and the UTSA coaching staff have brought UTSA from 'no football' to an FBS winning program in virtually the blink of an eye. I doubt anyone else could've brought us this far any faster. And this after nearly every football "expert" picked us to finish last in C-USA with a total of only 1 or 2 wins for the season at best. Guy simply doesn't get the recognition he deserves.

This can be a good thing for you guys from the standpoint of hanging on to him as long as possible. And I agree with everything you've said about what that coaching staff has done at UTSA. Zero to 60 in about 3.5 seconds.

For the Cajuns, I'm afraid that if Hud has another good year like the last 3, he'll be gone come 2015.

It seems they ranked all of the BCS coaches first and then ranked the non BCS coaches. That's a very unfair way to do this but then how does one go about ranking that many coaches? It's really an impossible task and isn't worth getting worked up about.

It is dumb to rank 120 things as subjective as this. Same thing for law and medical school rankings. Tiers are the best way to go. Is number 89 and 109 really that different (I didn't look at the list, so don't get too literal on me).

(04-11-2014 08:37 AM)NorthTexan95 Wrote:  It seems they ranked all of the BCS coaches first and then ranked the non BCS coaches. That's a very unfair way to do this but then how does one go about ranking that many coaches? It's really an impossible task and isn't worth getting worked up about.

You get what you pay for. People ***** about Ellis J, but please realize that both EJ and Monken only make about 80% of what Fedora did.

(04-10-2014 10:47 PM)MG61 Wrote:  FWIW Athlon's Rankings
http://athlonsports.com/college-football...aches-2014

How do you put a first year coach, never been a head coach, at vanderbilt at #62? Athlon is based in Nashville. All at that company are in the bag for the power conferences.