http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials...-party.htm

Quote:With an eye toward the 2016 election, the radical Muslim Brotherhood has built the framework for a political party in America that seeks to turn Muslims into an Islamist voting bloc.

'Muslim voters have the potential to be swing voters in 2016," said Nihad Awad in launching the benign-sounding U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations, whose membership reads like a Who's Who of Brotherhood front groups.

"We are aiming to bring more participation from the Muslim community."

USCMO also aims to elect Islamists in Washington, with the ultimate objective of "institutionalizing policies" favorable to Islamists — that is, Shariah law.

This development bears careful monitoring in light of the U.S. Brotherhood's recently exposed goal to wage a "civilization jihad" against America that explicitly calls for infiltrating the U.S. political system and "destroying (it) from within."

The subversive plan was spelled out in hundreds of pages of founding archives that the FBI confiscated from a Brotherhood leader's home in the Washington suburbs after 9/11.

Translated from Arabic, the secret documents listed a number of Brotherhood front organizations — some of which just happen to make up the newly formed USCMO.

Front and center is the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, the catalyst behind this Trojan horse jihadist political party.

CAIR is linked in federal criminal court documents to the terrorist group Hamas, the Brotherhood's Palestinian branch. CAIR's chief Awad, who announced the USCMO at the National Press Club, is so radioactive, the FBI refuses to do outreach with him and his so-called Muslim-rights group until it can "resolve whether there continues to be a connection between its executives and Hamas."

Equally troubling is the Muslim American Society, another founding member of the USCMO. MAS was formed as "the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States," a 2007 Justice Department court filing states. A 2011 MAS press release praised Osama bin Laden as "a visionary who believed in an Islamic state in Afghanistan."

The list of bad actors doesn't end there. The chairman of America's new Islamist party is none other than Oussama Jammal, who once headed the notorious Bridgeview Mosque in Chicago.

People who made comments suggesting this have been ridiculed on this board.

Will be interesting if it's true. Will police really enforce Shariah-based laws? Teachers and school administrators are already keen to be dhimmis, so that piece is in place.

I think the West will eventually get fed up like Switzerland did. They voted to ban minaret construction as immigrant muslims were using it as a way to conquer neighborhoods. Even Merkel of Germany said multiculturalism has failed. It's only a matter of time before the US realizes too.

What percentage of our already small amount of Muslims do you think will join?

(04-07-2014 04:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What percentage of our already small amount of Muslims do you think will join?

Probably not a large percentage if I had to guess.

Thank the guilty liberals in places like Dearborn.

(04-07-2014 04:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What percentage of our already small amount of Muslims do you think will join?

Join formally, or be influenced?

Part of this is that they will gain significant influence by voting in a bloc where there is high concentration: Dearborn, Minneapolis, Columbus, etc.

Then there will be neighborhoods that are not only under control, but have political shielding as well.

This is what goes on in UK and parts of continental Europe.

So what you are saying is that we are going to have political party that is run by religious zealots?

But we already have the republican party.

(04-07-2014 04:34 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  So what you are saying is that we are going to have political party that is run by religious zealots?

But we already have the republican party.

Oh, you're wicked smaht.

(04-07-2014 04:34 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  So what you are saying is that we are going to have political party that is run by religious zealots?

But we already have the republican party.

Meet the enabler.

(04-07-2014 04:35 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(04-07-2014 04:34 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  So what you are saying is that we are going to have political party that is run by religious zealots?

But we already have the republican party.

Oh, you're wicked smaht.

I knew you would like that one.

I'm not concerned. The supreme court has a history of voting against religious groups when they do things that conflict with constitution. If you think that anyone, liberal or conservative, would allow Sharia law to be a thing in the US, you have your head way too far up your ass.

(04-07-2014 06:34 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  I'm not concerned. The supreme court has a history of voting against religious groups when they do things that conflict with constitution. If you think that anyone, liberal or conservative, would allow Sharia law to be a thing in the US, you have your head way too far up your ass.

People in Europe said the same thing.

They laugh at our nativity. The Muslim population in the US is set to double in 15 years.

You better believe it is coming.

(04-07-2014 06:34 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  I'm not concerned. The supreme court has a history of voting against religious groups when they do things that conflict with constitution. If you think that anyone, liberal or conservative, would allow Sharia law to be a thing in the US, you have your head way too far up your ass.

Since you missed the point, do you have your head up your ass?

And why is it that the young college grads on this board can't understand basic English?

(04-07-2014 04:10 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  Will police really enforce Shariah-based laws?

You get a few Muslim cops, then a few prosecutors and judges, and then a Muslim becomes Attorney General who decides what parts of the Constitution he will and will not enforce. You eat the elephant with enough small bites and eventually the elephant is devoured.