Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UAB's AD on improving C-USA SOS and RPI
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
winston70 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,823
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 116
I Root For: La Tech
Location:
Post: #121
RE: UAB's AD on improving C-USA SOS and RPI
(04-12-2014 08:23 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  
(04-12-2014 06:22 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  
(04-09-2014 06:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  That's not quite right. I think we should be in the AAC and I think the people who screwed us were and are living right in Hattiesburg. Giannini talked up CUSA until he was blue in the face and then hauled ass right before the decent schools left.

So instead of directing your wrath at the conference, maybe you should redirect that wrath towards USM officials. Your rant about how bad you think this conference has become is rather bothersome and annoying......like yourself.

That is exactly where my wrath is directed. I'm sorry if that was unclear.

I've been far more critical of our AD, and his two predecessors, than I have been of any other C-USA school.

My criticism of the conference itself has been limited to saying that it's just a poor fit for Southern Miss, and that being here is nothing for us to take pride in. UNT, La Tech... by all means y'all should take pride in the fact that you moved up where ULM, Troy, etc. did not. Our situation is 180 degrees opposite.

I've also been just about the only Southern Miss fan here to call B.S. on our AD's recent comments. It's not C-USA's job to get us into a postseason tournament. That's just bunk. If we want to be in a multi-bid league, we should get into one. C-USA used to be a 4 or even 5-bid league. It's not any more. We'll slip in two in a very, very good year... maybe.

If Bill McGillis doesn't like it, he knows where the door is... just follow Louisville, USF, ECU, TCU, UCF, Tulsa, Houston, Memphis, Tulane, St. Louis, Marquette, Cincy... you catch my drift.

We were in a pretty good WAC conference for a while...
04-13-2014 10:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chuckk3 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 910
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 182
I Root For: LaTech
Location: north Louisiana
Post: #122
RE: UAB's AD on improving C-USA SOS and RPI
(04-13-2014 10:12 PM)winston70 Wrote:  
(04-12-2014 08:23 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  
(04-12-2014 06:22 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  
(04-09-2014 06:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  That's not quite right. I think we should be in the AAC and I think the people who screwed us were and are living right in Hattiesburg. Giannini talked up CUSA until he was blue in the face and then hauled ass right before the decent schools left.

So instead of directing your wrath at the conference, maybe you should redirect that wrath towards USM officials. Your rant about how bad you think this conference has become is rather bothersome and annoying......like yourself.

That is exactly where my wrath is directed. I'm sorry if that was unclear.

I've been far more critical of our AD, and his two predecessors, than I have been of any other C-USA school.

My criticism of the conference itself has been limited to saying that it's just a poor fit for Southern Miss, and that being here is nothing for us to take pride in. UNT, La Tech... by all means y'all should take pride in the fact that you moved up where ULM, Troy, etc. did not. Our situation is 180 degrees opposite.

I've also been just about the only Southern Miss fan here to call B.S. on our AD's recent comments. It's not C-USA's job to get us into a postseason tournament. That's just bunk. If we want to be in a multi-bid league, we should get into one. C-USA used to be a 4 or even 5-bid league. It's not any more. We'll slip in two in a very, very good year... maybe.

If Bill McGillis doesn't like it, he knows where the door is... just follow Louisville, USF, ECU, TCU, UCF, Tulsa, Houston, Memphis, Tulane, St. Louis, Marquette, Cincy... you catch my drift.

We were in a pretty good WAC conference for a while...

That seems to be a common misunderstanding with legacy C-USA folks. While I love and prefer the geography of C-USA, we certainly did not move "UP" by joining it.

Most folks have a positive, favorable, impression of the MWC. Guess what? The power teams of the Mountain West were the core of the old WAC...US!
(This post was last modified: 04-14-2014 09:55 AM by chuckk3.)
04-14-2014 09:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HogDawg Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,354
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 549
I Root For: LA Tech
Location: FranklinTNMcKinneyTX
Post: #123
RE: UAB's AD on improving C-USA SOS and RPI
(04-14-2014 09:54 AM)chuckk3 Wrote:  
(04-13-2014 10:12 PM)winston70 Wrote:  
(04-12-2014 08:23 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  
(04-12-2014 06:22 PM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  
(04-09-2014 06:11 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  That's not quite right. I think we should be in the AAC and I think the people who screwed us were and are living right in Hattiesburg. Giannini talked up CUSA until he was blue in the face and then hauled ass right before the decent schools left.

So instead of directing your wrath at the conference, maybe you should redirect that wrath towards USM officials. Your rant about how bad you think this conference has become is rather bothersome and annoying......like yourself.

That is exactly where my wrath is directed. I'm sorry if that was unclear.

I've been far more critical of our AD, and his two predecessors, than I have been of any other C-USA school.

My criticism of the conference itself has been limited to saying that it's just a poor fit for Southern Miss, and that being here is nothing for us to take pride in. UNT, La Tech... by all means y'all should take pride in the fact that you moved up where ULM, Troy, etc. did not. Our situation is 180 degrees opposite.

I've also been just about the only Southern Miss fan here to call B.S. on our AD's recent comments. It's not C-USA's job to get us into a postseason tournament. That's just bunk. If we want to be in a multi-bid league, we should get into one. C-USA used to be a 4 or even 5-bid league. It's not any more. We'll slip in two in a very, very good year... maybe.

If Bill McGillis doesn't like it, he knows where the door is... just follow Louisville, USF, ECU, TCU, UCF, Tulsa, Houston, Memphis, Tulane, St. Louis, Marquette, Cincy... you catch my drift.

We were in a pretty good WAC conference for a while...

That seems to be a common misunderstanding with legacy C-USA folks. While I love and prefer the geography of C-USA, we certainly did not move "UP" by joining it.

Most folks have a positive, favorable, impression of the MWC. Guess what? The power teams of the Mountain West were the core of the old WAC...US!

Ditto! The old WAC that included LA Tech, UTEP, SMU, Rice and Tulsa in the east was a great fit for us. Fact is, we are in a very similar "conference" situation to USM's....just with a different set of circumstances. OH....and we had a football team before 1980 too. 04-rock
04-14-2014 10:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.