#1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

2006 Week 1 Rankings
#6 Louisville

If you are trying to shut me down by having the entire board laugh at you; you are doing a great job. Even your miserable friends are cringing at that one.

(03-27-2014 12:05 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

No in fact I just made a post saying give Josh more time. I have been critical but I BELIEVE he is going to get the job done here. Period.

(03-27-2014 12:05 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

It's simple. If you are able to recognize accomplishments and be critical of shortcomings, you have an agenda.

If everything you say is negative; with a disregard for facts; you make 100 posts after losses; disappear after wins and have nothing good to say; you do not have an agenda.

(03-27-2014 12:06 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

2006 Week 1 Rankings
#6 Louisville

If you are trying to shut me down by having the entire board laugh at you; you are doing a great job. Even your miserable friends are cringing at that one.

Again, that has noting to do with what I said. They were over hyped coming off of a final four. Also, how is anything laughable? Did Louisville not go through the conference and the teams I listed that season? Same with Cincy, Marquette and Depaul.

Stammers, for the sake of this board please shut the F*** up for just 1 day. 90% of us need a break from you. You occasionally post something worth reading so I won't put you on ignore, however, the 10% that you run with are in the minority.

For the record I am in the Give Josh more time club just so some of you don't get it misunderstood and in my lengthy post I even said give Josh more time. Just want to clear that up.

(03-27-2014 12:09 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:05 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

It's simple. If you are able to recognize accomplishments and be critical of shortcomings, you have an agenda.

If everything you say is negative; with a disregard for facts; you make 100 posts after losses; disappear after wins and have nothing good to say; you do not have an agenda.

I say both good and critical comments. I do not disappear after wins, I do not want Josh fired, I am one of the few i guess that is excited and maybe a little too optimistic about next years recruiting class.

You're agenda is to try and derail anything anyone says that you do not agree with. You try to jump on anyone who has a different opinion than you. You post things like this to try and prove a point when in fact 5 of the teams you listed are not on par with the others and the 3 that are on a good/elite level went through hell making the tournament in their first season in the Big East.

Why don't you list conference schedules/opponents for said seasons? I know exactly why, because it would ruin your agenda.

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

Winning!

(03-27-2014 12:14 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

Winning!

BOOM!

(03-27-2014 12:09 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:05 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

It's simple. If you are able to recognize accomplishments and be critical of shortcomings, you have an agenda.

If everything you say is negative; with a disregard for facts; you make 100 posts after losses; disappear after wins and have nothing good to say; you do not have an agenda.

I wonder if you have an agenda if all you do is argue with people and call them stupid? What's that positive? What a a joke.

(03-27-2014 12:10 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:06 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

2006 Week 1 Rankings
#6 Louisville

If you are trying to shut me down by having the entire board laugh at you; you are doing a great job. Even your miserable friends are cringing at that one.

Again, that has noting to do with what I said. They were over hyped coming off of a final four. Also, how is anything laughable? Did Louisville not go through the conference and the teams I listed that season? Same with Cincy, Marquette and Depaul.

Stammers, for the sake of this board please shut the F*** up for just 1 day. 90% of us need a break from you. You occasionally post something worth reading so I won't put you on ignore, however, the 10% that you run with are in the minority.

For the record I am in the Give Josh more time club just so some of you don't get it misunderstood and in my lengthy post I even said give Josh more time. Just want to clear that up.

Louisville was overhyped at #8? Now you're just making stuff up. So angry and hilarious at the same time. You don't even understand the point of the thread.

(03-27-2014 12:13 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:09 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:05 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

It's simple. If you are able to recognize accomplishments and be critical of shortcomings, you have an agenda.

If everything you say is negative; with a disregard for facts; you make 100 posts after losses; disappear after wins and have nothing good to say; you do not have an agenda.

I say both good and critical comments. I do not disappear after wins, I do not want Josh fired, I am one of the few i guess that is excited and maybe a little too optimistic about next years recruiting class.

You're agenda is to try and derail anything anyone says that you do not agree with. You try to jump on anyone who has a different opinion than you. You post things like this to try and prove a point when in fact 5 of the teams you listed are not on par with the others and the 3 that are on a good/elite level went through hell making the tournament in their first season in the Big East.

Why don't you list conference schedules/opponents for said seasons? I know exactly why, because it would ruin your agenda.

I started the thread and I am apparently derailing it. That takes the cake. You're so worked up you don't even realize what you are posting.

What is going on in this thread?

(03-27-2014 12:26 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:09 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:05 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

It's simple. If you are able to recognize accomplishments and be critical of shortcomings, you have an agenda.

If everything you say is negative; with a disregard for facts; you make 100 posts after losses; disappear after wins and have nothing good to say; you do not have an agenda.

I wonder if you have an agenda if all you do is argue with people and call them stupid? What's that positive? What a a joke.

Burnt out light bulb.

(03-27-2014 12:31 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  What is going on in this thread?

I was merely pointing out that there is an adjustment period for teams when they go to a tougher conference, and history bears that out. The angry duo have no clue that is what I'm talking about. Then one of them accuses me of having an agenda, even though I always bring up both positive and negative facts. The other one then accuses me of being negative even though 99% of his posts have been negative since the season started.

Then one of them accused me of derailing my own thread; which makes no sense at all, since my tone has been consistent throughout. Two funny guys.

(03-27-2014 12:27 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:10 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:06 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 11:44 PM)Stammers Wrote:  #1 SMU
2013: 15-17
2014: 26-9

#2 Memphis
2013: 31-5
2014: 24-10

#3 Marquette
2005: 19-12
2006: 20-11

#4 Cincinnati
2005: 25-8
2006: 21-13

#5 Louisville
2005: 33-5
2006: 21-13

#6 Houston
2013: 20-13
2014: 17-16

#7 DePaul
2005: 20-11
2006: 12-15

#8 UCF
2013: 20-11
2014: 13-18

#9 USF
2013: 14-16
2014: 7-22

Memphis is the only team to make the NCAA tournament both seasons.

USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

2006 Week 1 Rankings
#6 Louisville

If you are trying to shut me down by having the entire board laugh at you; you are doing a great job. Even your miserable friends are cringing at that one.

Again, that has noting to do with what I said. They were over hyped coming off of a final four. Also, how is anything laughable? Did Louisville not go through the conference and the teams I listed that season? Same with Cincy, Marquette and Depaul.

Stammers, for the sake of this board please shut the F*** up for just 1 day. 90% of us need a break from you. You occasionally post something worth reading so I won't put you on ignore, however, the 10% that you run with are in the minority.

For the record I am in the Give Josh more time club just so some of you don't get it misunderstood and in my lengthy post I even said give Josh more time. Just want to clear that up.

Louisville was overhyped at #8? Now you're just making stuff up. So angry and hilarious at the same time. You don't even understand the point of the thread.

Of course I understand the point of the thread.

However, you apparently don't understand how basketball and the media works.

Louisville went to the FINAL FOUR.

They LOST Garcia, O'Bannon, George, and Myles off that team.

They added 6 Freshmen.

Then played in the gauntlet that was the Big East.

As I said, happy the Tigers made it in their first year of a new conference but throwing out all of those teams and taking jabs at a few of them when they played in a MUCH tougher conference to meet your agenda will and has been called out.

(03-27-2014 12:31 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:26 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:09 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:05 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:00 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  USF, UCF, DePaul, SMU (Although they are about to do good things) and Houston? They didn't make it either season and rarely do anyway.

Louisville, Cincy, and Marquette came into a conference with UConn, Syracuse, Georgetown, Villanova, Seton hall, St. Johns, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, and Providence. Louisville after coming off a final four and losing some players.

I'm glad we made it, but we hardly had the gauntlet Louisville, Cincy and Marquette had.

Again, keep twisting things to meet your agenda and I'll be here to shut you down.

What is his agenda? Are you part of the Lynch Josh Mob?

It's simple. If you are able to recognize accomplishments and be critical of shortcomings, you have an agenda.

If everything you say is negative; with a disregard for facts; you make 100 posts after losses; disappear after wins and have nothing good to say; you do not have an agenda.

I wonder if you have an agenda if all you do is argue with people and call them stupid? What's that positive? What a a joke.

Burnt out light bulb.

(03-27-2014 12:31 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  What is going on in this thread?

Not buying into Stammer's BS.

He runs around derailing good threads, then post things like this to meet his "agenda". I simply returned the favor. Simple as that and no I'm not above it.

(03-27-2014 12:39 AM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(03-27-2014 12:31 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  What is going on in this thread?

Not buying into Stammer's BS.

He runs around derailing good threads, then post things like this to meet his "agenda". I simply returned the favor. Simple as that and no I'm not above it.

Ok. Continue on