Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
President Leebron's spring letter
Author Message
loki_the_bubba Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,719
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 710
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #1
President Leebron's spring letter
just hit my email inbox. He mentions the north end zone facility.
03-20-2014 04:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


westsidewolf1989 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,233
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 74
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #2
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
Do you know offhand what distribution list that was sent to? I feel like there are more than a handful of these lists, but I always end up missing out on some.
03-20-2014 04:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
loki_the_bubba Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,719
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 710
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #3
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 04:08 PM)westsidewolf1989 Wrote:  Do you know offhand what distribution list that was sent to? I feel like there are more than a handful of these lists, but I always end up missing out on some.

No idea. But there is a contact at the bottom if you want to update info.
http://alumni.rice.edu/expressupdate
03-20-2014 04:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Afflicted Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,249
Joined: Sep 2009
I Root For: Rice and UH
Location:
Post: #4
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
What did he say? Can you provide a link for the less privileged?
03-20-2014 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


loki_the_bubba Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,719
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 710
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #5
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 04:14 PM)Afflicted Wrote:  What did he say? Can you provide a link for the less privileged?

Let's see if there is a character limit here...



While only about three fourths over, this academic year, our first following the spectacular centennial celebration of 2012, has been exciting and gone by quickly. I find it hard to believe that we are now only a couple months away from commencement. Despite the many happenings, I promised that I would keep my letters shorter, and so here goes.
In the fall we officially celebrated the completion of our $1 billion campaign. We raised $1.1 billion, and this generosity from alumni, friends, parents, foundations and corporate donors has made an extraordinary amount possible on our campus. While the effects of the campus are physically visible everywhere (new academic buildings, new residential colleges, new social venues, new and renovated athletics facilities and extraordinary campus art), an equally large impact has come from the support you can’t see but would certainly hear about if you talked to our students, faculty and staff: new faculty positions, enhanced scholarship support and new programs, centers and institutes. We are engaged both locally in Houston and around the world as never before.
Extraordinary generosity toward the end of our campaign has meant that construction continues. The new Anderson-Clarke Center, home of the Glasscock School of Continuing Studies, has been completed except for finishing touches on a much needed auditorium and cinema, and is a stunning beginning to what will soon be rapid development on the western end of our campus. A spectacular new tennis facility is also under way near the stadium and just off Rice Boulevard. We are completing fundraising and architectural plans for a new social sciences building, Robert Klein Hall; an interdisciplinary arts center, the Moody Center for the Arts; an opera center and theater; and a football facility to be located at the northern end of the stadium. This activity is also necessitating a comprehensive look at campus development, including some additional underground or above ground parking so that we can preserve green space and playing fields.
The growth goal we set under the Vision for the Second Century of our student body has been met, and now stands at an entering class of 950 students for a total undergraduate student body of about 3,800, plus a graduate student body of about 2,500. Even with the growth, we remain the smallest elite wide-spectrum research university. We are now nearing the completion of our 2014 admissions season, with the staff having to make difficult choices among more than 17,700 applicants, up an astonishing 15 percent from last year. The composition of that pool has changed radically, with more than 10,000 applicants from the United States outside of Texas, and nearly 2,800 from international students. The applicant pool and the student body are incredibly diverse along every dimension. Like the city of Houston, there is no single group that constitutes a majority.
Our faculty continues to win acclaim. Let me provide just a couple of recent examples. Naomi Halas was recently elected to the National Academy of Engineering, making her one of the few who are members of both the NAE and the National Academy of Sciences. Caleb McDaniel, a history professor, recently won a major award for his book “The Problem of Democracy in the Age of Slavery,” as did art historian Joe Manca for his book “George Washington’s Eye: Landscape, Architecture, and Design at Mount Vernon.” Both books are available on Amazon. Rebecca Richards-Kortum and Maria Oden were awarded the MIT-Lemelson Award for Global Innovation “for their life saving inventions and dedication to mentorship.” Recruiting talented people is important as well, and we recently announced a major initiative in economics under the leadership of our newly appointed chair of economics, Antonio Merlo, who is director of the Penn Economics Institute and former chair of the University of Pennsylvania’s renowned economics department.
In two areas, we have had a particularly momentous year. The Shepherd School orchestra performed in Carnegie Hall in New York as well as at the Joseph Meyerhoff Symphony Hall in Baltimore, their first performances outside of Rice. The reaction of the audience, which included many alumni, was enthusiastic. And not far from Alice Pratt Brown Hall, home of the Shepherd School, our football team turned in a historic year, racking up a pre-bowl record of 10-3, including for the first time in 57 years an outright conference championship. And at Reckling Park, Wayne Graham celebrated his 1,000th win for Rice! In Tudor Fieldhouse, Jessica Kuster set new all-time Rice career scoring and rebounding records, and our women’s swim team won its second consecutive conference championship. We have great new leadership for our athletics program in our new director Joe Karlgaard, who was recently named one of the “Forty under 40” in all areas of sports endeavors, and indeed the only university-affiliated person on the list.
Perhaps my favorite project, one which emerged out of the Oshman Engineering Design Kitchen, was the robotic arm that our students designed and built for a young man suffering from osteogenesis imperfecta, or brittle bone disease. This work brought together every aspect of our mission: teaching, research, service. You can see the video here (Preview) , which has become Rice’s most viewed video with more than 815,000 views. These students didn’t simply complete a course assignment; they went beyond any requirements and on their own initiative saw this project through to completion and made sure that it had impact on a young person and his family. That spirit is evident across our campus as, for example, we set yet another record in United Way contributions this year. Our new board chair Bobby Tudor has picked up the reins from Jim Crownover in helping us with that campaign, one of the signature ways Rice gives back to its home community.
The talent and exuberance of our students extends in so many dimensions. We now even have our own mariachi band, Mariachi Luna Llena. And while they probably won’t be in Carnegie Hall anytime soon, they have already contributed much to campus life and events. The students themselves are no doubt the primary reason that, according to surveys conducted by the Princeton Review, our students have ranked us No. 1 or 2 in the country for student happiness and quality life for the past several years. (We ranked No. 3 this past year for “best-run colleges” as well!)
The success of our graduates is every bit as important as that of our faculty and students. Forbes recently published a list of “30 under 30” in various fields, including science and health care. Two Rice recent grads and a current graduate student made that list, which is just extraordinary given Rice’s small size. A Shepherd school alumna, Caroline Shaw ’04, won both a Pulitzer Prize and a Grammy. And Kevin Schell ’11 was named one of 18 Luce Scholars. Of course, extraordinary Rice grads are not new. If you missed it, see the story on Noel Parrish ’28, commander of the Tuskegee air force base who fought for the right of the Tuskegee Airmen to undertake combat missions. Ultimately, it is the success of our graduates, and the degree to which they attribute some measure of that success to their Rice experience and education, on which we must be judged. In a survey of alumni of several hundred colleges and universities a couple years ago, Rice ranked fourth in the country in alumni success, happiness and satisfaction with their education. I certainly hope that is the case with you.
But we cannot rest on past success. You have no doubt read about the very substantial forces and changes buffeting higher education today. One of the most important is digital education. I am pleased to say that our faculty has responded both thoughtfully and enthusiastically to the challenge. We now have a half dozen MOOCs — Massively Open Online Courses — with 20 more in development. Rice is one of the few universities to have joined both of the two major consortiums — Coursera and EdX and we continue to explore other possibilities as well. We see online education as presenting first and foremost better opportunities for our on-campus students, but ultimately also for students who cannot study at Rice — young and old! — as well as our alumni and other audiences.
Equally important is the push, both external and internal, to deliver more in terms of our education. This past year we implemented our new Program in Writing and Communication, including a mandatory first year writing seminar. All across the campus you will see a new emphasis on leadership. The revamped Leadership Rice program and the now five-year-old Rice Center for Engineering Leadership have been at the vanguard, but the effort is broader and deeper. Similarly, there is a new entrepreneurial spirit on campus, which I spoke about in my centennial address and wrote about in the last issue of Rice Magazine. One recent development is the student organization OwlSpark (I love that name!), which supports students and recent alumni in starting entrepreneurial ventures. You can read more about that in that issue of Rice Magazine as well. And the Rice Alliance for Technology and Entrepreneurship continues to grow, launching new companies and conducting one of the most successful business plan competitions in the world. Our students also actively participate in each other’s education, with record numbers serving as residential college-based Peer Academic Advisors or Academic Fellows and Mentors. When you take into account as well the small army of O-week advisors, you can see that this is truly a community in which all are expected to both teach and learn.
Which brings me to one big change for me. For the first time since I arrived at Rice just under a decade ago, I am teaching a full course. It’s called “The Legal Framework of Religious Tolerance” and focuses on the religion clauses of the first amendment. It’s designed both for people interested in the problem of religious freedom and tolerance in a secular and diverse state, and for those who would like some exposure to law and legal analysis. As I tweeted (what do you mean you don’t follow me on Twitter?), I have had to take it on faith and circumstantial evidence until now how extraordinarily talented our students are. Now I get to experience it firsthand.
And that reminds me, I better get to grading some of those papers. Please do come and visit the campus and talk with our students, faculty and staff. I think you will find that the most important things that distinguish Rice remain true as we have moved boldly into our second century.
Warm regards,
David W. Leebron
President
P.S. I enjoy connecting with you to share the many amazing stories from campus. Please take a minute to provide us with your preferred contact information. Your information will only be used by the Rice community. http://alumni.rice.edu/expressupdate.
03-20-2014 04:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RiceDoc Offline
Jersey Retired
Jersey Retired

Posts: 7,541
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Rice
Location: Tomball

The Parliament AwardsFootball GeniusNew Orleans BowlCrappiesDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #6
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 04:47 PM)HatchetMan Wrote:  tl;dr - A bunch of b.s.

Listen, the only thing that should be at the top of his list and that he needs to address is the fall in the US News Rankings. Spare me the debate on the faults of the methodology used to compile those rankings - the fact is, that's what people look at when comparing one school to another (academically). It's absolutely unacceptable that we're dropping, and have continued to drop, since he's taken over. This is where his focus should be.

Too bad; oughtta read. Mostly pablum, but good overall state of the university address. And US News Rankings are NOT the only thing that people look at when comparing one school to another, not even when the comparison is strictly academic! For example, when I matriculated, I considered Rice and UH and noted that UH at that time had higher ranked Chemical Engineering programs than Rice did. Not significantly higher, but higher nonetheless. And since I wanted to be a ChemE, that was an important consideration for me. Since UH is the only school in the SWC that declined to offer me a football scholarship (and notably they pulled their indication that an offer was forthcoming after finding out I wanted to be a ChemE), it became academic (so to speak). Notably, while I looked at the academic side extensively, if Rice had not had D1 football, I wouldn't have considered Rice at all! Without D1 football, Rice would have ranked with Trinity on my school choices lists. And given that you are on this board, I think it is an important issue in YOUR view of Rice too.

Moreover, I don't disagree with you that the academic side should be Leebron's primary focus, but I sure disagree that US News Rankings should be his highest focus. It should be ONE consideration on his plate, but certainly NOT the only one or even the primary one.
03-20-2014 05:12 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
waltgreenberg Online
Legend
*

Posts: 33,265
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 141
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Chicago

The Parliament Awards
Post: #7
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 05:40 PM)HatchetMan Wrote:  
(03-20-2014 05:12 PM)RiceDoc Wrote:  
(03-20-2014 04:47 PM)HatchetMan Wrote:  tl;dr - A bunch of b.s.

Listen, the only thing that should be at the top of his list and that he needs to address is the fall in the US News Rankings. Spare me the debate on the faults of the methodology used to compile those rankings - the fact is, that's what people look at when comparing one school to another (academically). It's absolutely unacceptable that we're dropping, and have continued to drop, since he's taken over. This is where his focus should be.

Too bad; oughtta read. Mostly pablum, but good overall state of the university address. And US News Rankings are NOT the only thing that people look at when comparing one school to another, not even when the comparison is strictly academic! For example, when I matriculated, I considered Rice and UH and noted that UH at that time had higher ranked Chemical Engineering programs than Rice did. Not significantly higher, but higher nonetheless. And since I wanted to be a ChemE, that was an important consideration for me. Since UH is the only school in the SWC that declined to offer me a football scholarship (and notably they pulled their indication that an offer was forthcoming after finding out I wanted to be a ChemE), it became academic (so to speak). Notably, while I looked at the academic side extensively, if Rice had not had D1 football, I wouldn't have considered Rice at all! Without D1 football, Rice would have ranked with Trinity on my school choices lists. And given that you are on this board, I think it is an important issue in YOUR view of Rice too.

Moreover, I don't disagree with you that the academic side should be Leebron's primary focus, but I sure disagree that US News Rankings should be his highest focus. It should be ONE consideration on his plate, but certainly NOT the only one or even the primary one.

I didn't say it was the only thing people looked at for comparisons - I implied that it's the most important people looked at. I don't know if he's ever admitted that the rankings are even on his radar. I'm sure he grapples with them privately, but nevertheless, it should be at the forefront. If Rice falls out of the top 20 then degrees/prestige are devalued. More eloquently put, he needs to "$hit or get off the pot" so to speak.

...but it's NOT the most important thing the majority of people look at, and I strongly disagree that it should be at the forefront. Leebron has his priorities right, IMO, and this coming from an out-of-stater who was a native NYer when I matriculated at Rice. Sure, rankings are important, but given how high we're ranked in some of the other rankings, having a lower than desired-- and warranted-- ranking in one publication, even if perceived as the most important, is not going to hurt us in the big picture scheme of things.

But since you want to harp on the importance of the US News and World Report ranking, one thing that has dragged us down over the past 10+ years is our embarrassingly low annual donation participation rate. Give this ranking is so all-important to you, I certainly hope you give annually to the Rice Annual Fund, as the participation rate is a key criteria used by USN&WR in rating student/alumni satisfaction.
03-20-2014 05:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


75src Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,591
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 25
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #8
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
I went ahead and gave tonight to the Annual Fund in the college challenge because I know it is a factor in the rankings (although I was unhappy with them calling my cell phone number when they could not reach my home phone because I was in a meeting). I am tired of being hounded to give when I give something anyway every year even though I give more to the Owl Club. I have to be sure to give at least as much to the Annual Fund as I give to the A&M Former Students or UH Law School.

Although the US News rankings should not be the most important factor in deciding what school is best for a prospective student, the rankings are still important. I remember that Nancy Rappoport got removed at UH Law for dropping 20 places in the US News rankings. John Mixon's book blamed her for decreasing selectivity and increasing average class sizes by increasing admissions. The number of admissions has dropped since then. One of the four day sections has been dropped.

I do not think Trinity has a chemical engineering program.


(03-20-2014 05:12 PM)RiceDoc Wrote:  
(03-20-2014 04:47 PM)HatchetMan Wrote:  tl;dr - A bunch of b.s.

Listen, the only thing that should be at the top of his list and that he needs to address is the fall in the US News Rankings. Spare me the debate on the faults of the methodology used to compile those rankings - the fact is, that's what people look at when comparing one school to another (academically). It's absolutely unacceptable that we're dropping, and have continued to drop, since he's taken over. This is where his focus should be.

Too bad; oughtta read. Mostly pablum, but good overall state of the university address. And US News Rankings are NOT the only thing that people look at when comparing one school to another, not even when the comparison is strictly academic! For example, when I matriculated, I considered Rice and UH and noted that UH at that time had higher ranked Chemical Engineering programs than Rice did. Not significantly higher, but higher nonetheless. And since I wanted to be a ChemE, that was an important consideration for me. Since UH is the only school in the SWC that declined to offer me a football scholarship (and notably they pulled their indication that an offer was forthcoming after finding out I wanted to be a ChemE), it became academic (so to speak). Notably, while I looked at the academic side extensively, if Rice had not had D1 football, I wouldn't have considered Rice at all! Without D1 football, Rice would have ranked with Trinity on my school choices lists. And given that you are on this board, I think it is an important issue in YOUR view of Rice too.

Moreover, I don't disagree with you that the academic side should be Leebron's primary focus, but I sure disagree that US News Rankings should be his highest focus. It should be ONE consideration on his plate, but certainly NOT the only one or even the primary one.
03-20-2014 08:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
westsidewolf1989 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,233
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 74
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #9
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
If you enjoyed your experience at Rice, there's zero excuse for not donating some amount of money to the RAF. I'm a big believer in paying it forward and ensuring (as best as I can) that future Rice students have as good of an experience at Rice as I did.
03-20-2014 09:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
loki_the_bubba Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,719
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 710
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #10
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 09:10 PM)westsidewolf1989 Wrote:  If you enjoyed your experience at Rice, there's zero excuse for not donating some amount of money to the RAF. I'm a big believer in paying it forward and ensuring (as best as I can) that future Rice students have as good of an experience at Rice as I did.

I send some every year. Just a lot less lately since I have one kid at Notre Dame and one at WPI.
03-20-2014 09:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


westsidewolf1989 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,233
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 74
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #11
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 09:11 PM)loki_the_bubba Wrote:  
(03-20-2014 09:10 PM)westsidewolf1989 Wrote:  If you enjoyed your experience at Rice, there's zero excuse for not donating some amount of money to the RAF. I'm a big believer in paying it forward and ensuring (as best as I can) that future Rice students have as good of an experience at Rice as I did.

I send some every year. Just a lot less lately since I have one kid at Notre Dame and one at WPI.

Sure, every person's situation is different. I just think it's important to give back, whether you're a 24 year old guy like myself, a guy with multiple kids in college, or a retiree, to at least give back. Just sets a precedent for supporting the university throughout your lifetime
03-20-2014 09:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RiceDoc Offline
Jersey Retired
Jersey Retired

Posts: 7,541
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Rice
Location: Tomball

The Parliament AwardsFootball GeniusNew Orleans BowlCrappiesDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #12
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 08:27 PM)75src Wrote:  I do not think Trinity has a chemical engineering program.

(03-20-2014 05:12 PM)RiceDoc Wrote:  For example, when I matriculated, I considered Rice and UH and noted that UH at that time had higher ranked Chemical Engineering programs than Rice did. Not significantly higher, but higher nonetheless. And since I wanted to be a ChemE, that was an important consideration for me. Since UH is the only school in the SWC that declined to offer me a football scholarship (and notably they pulled their indication that an offer was forthcoming after finding out I wanted to be a ChemE), it became academic (so to speak). Notably, while I looked at the academic side extensively, if Rice had not had D1 football, I wouldn't have considered Rice at all! Without D1 football, Rice would have ranked with Trinity on my school choices lists.

I don't know if Trinity has chem E or not. They didn't have D1 football, so they went on my "great academic school that I won't bother to waste time and effort learning anything more about" list. My first cut was D1 football. Second cut was above average academic ranking. Third cut was highly rated Chem E program. Thus, without D1 football, Trinity didn't make it past the first hurdle even though it is a fine school. Rice, with D1 football, did make it past that hurdle. Boise similarly dropped off at the second cut. Rice didn't. Baylor dropped off at the third cut, despite Grant Teaff's plea that I consider one of the other accredited engineering programs Baylor offered (Baylor's ChemE was not accredited at that time; it may be now). Are those harsh criteria? Perhaps. But I wanted top level football, academics and specifically ChemE. Notably, UH was in a category by itself: D1 football, good enough academics to meet my criteria, excellent ChemE. But Bill Yeoman flat out told me that if I wanted to be a Chemical Engineering student, they didn't have a scholarship for me any more. If I wanted to be a non-S/E, then they had a scholarship for me. So UH's football coaches self selected themselves out of my options. And ultimately it came down to Vanderbilt, USC, UCLA and Rice. I recognize that I approached it differently than most, but if I were making the decision today, I don't know if Rice would be in the mix due to the top level football criteria. I quite frankly didn't have to distinguish between "BCS" and "other D1" at that time except when it came to the Ivy League schools. And the Ivies got dropped from my options lists due to their not offering top level football (regardless of what you called the class they played in). The Ivies had a lot of attraction, but at the end of the day, I wanted something more well rounded than that - I wanted real D1 football too. And Rice should be a place that offers that as an option. To not do so devalues the University and the value of my degrees, IMHO. It gets back to my basic philosophy - if it is worth doing, it is worth doing as well as you can possibly do it. And that is why the "drop to DIII" and "be happy with CUSA light" pitches grate on my nerves so much. We shouldn't settle. There is a place for us alongside the Vanderbilts and Stanfords and USC's of the collegiate world. Rice's struggle should be to achieve that status and stay there.

Just my opinion and worth about what you paid for it.
03-20-2014 09:24 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
loki_the_bubba Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,719
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 710
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #13
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-20-2014 09:19 PM)westsidewolf1989 Wrote:  
(03-20-2014 09:11 PM)loki_the_bubba Wrote:  
(03-20-2014 09:10 PM)westsidewolf1989 Wrote:  If you enjoyed your experience at Rice, there's zero excuse for not donating some amount of money to the RAF. I'm a big believer in paying it forward and ensuring (as best as I can) that future Rice students have as good of an experience at Rice as I did.

I send some every year. Just a lot less lately since I have one kid at Notre Dame and one at WPI.

Sure, every person's situation is different. I just think it's important to give back, whether you're a 24 year old guy like myself, a guy with multiple kids in college, or a retiree, to at least give back. Just sets a precedent for supporting the university throughout your lifetime

Agreed. I only got in trouble once, when I was unemployed and sent a hundred buck. Probably would have been ok but my wife went to Houston.
03-20-2014 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


75src Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,591
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 25
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #14
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
We had top level football 50 years ago. Rice only lost to no. 1 Texas by 4 points in 1963. We were 6-4 and turned down a Sunbowl invitation because it was not good enough. My parents took me to Rice games in those days so I remember. If you do not aim for the top, you are going wind up at the bottom.

(03-20-2014 09:24 PM)RiceDoc Wrote:  
(03-20-2014 08:27 PM)75src Wrote:  I do not think Trinity has a chemical engineering program.

(03-20-2014 05:12 PM)RiceDoc Wrote:  For example, when I matriculated, I considered Rice and UH and noted that UH at that time had higher ranked Chemical Engineering programs than Rice did. Not significantly higher, but higher nonetheless. And since I wanted to be a ChemE, that was an important consideration for me. Since UH is the only school in the SWC that declined to offer me a football scholarship (and notably they pulled their indication that an offer was forthcoming after finding out I wanted to be a ChemE), it became academic (so to speak). Notably, while I looked at the academic side extensively, if Rice had not had D1 football, I wouldn't have considered Rice at all! Without D1 football, Rice would have ranked with Trinity on my school choices lists.

I don't know if Trinity has chem E or not. They didn't have D1 football, so they went on my "great academic school that I won't bother to waste time and effort learning anything more about" list. My first cut was D1 football. Second cut was above average academic ranking. Third cut was highly rated Chem E program. Thus, without D1 football, Trinity didn't make it past the first hurdle even though it is a fine school. Rice, with D1 football, did make it past that hurdle. Boise similarly dropped off at the second cut. Rice didn't. Baylor dropped off at the third cut, despite Grant Teaff's plea that I consider one of the other accredited engineering programs Baylor offered (Baylor's ChemE was not accredited at that time; it may be now). Are those harsh criteria? Perhaps. But I wanted top level football, academics and specifically ChemE. Notably, UH was in a category by itself: D1 football, good enough academics to meet my criteria, excellent ChemE. But Bill Yeoman flat out told me that if I wanted to be a Chemical Engineering student, they didn't have a scholarship for me any more. If I wanted to be a non-S/E, then they had a scholarship for me. So UH's football coaches self selected themselves out of my options. And ultimately it came down to Vanderbilt, USC, UCLA and Rice. I recognize that I approached it differently than most, but if I were making the decision today, I don't know if Rice would be in the mix due to the top level football criteria. I quite frankly didn't have to distinguish between "BCS" and "other D1" at that time except when it came to the Ivy League schools. And the Ivies got dropped from my options lists due to their not offering top level football (regardless of what you called the class they played in). The Ivies had a lot of attraction, but at the end of the day, I wanted something more well rounded than that - I wanted real D1 football too. And Rice should be a place that offers that as an option. To not do so devalues the University and the value of my degrees, IMHO. It gets back to my basic philosophy - if it is worth doing, it is worth doing as well as you can possibly do it. And that is why the "drop to DIII" and "be happy with CUSA light" pitches grate on my nerves so much. We shouldn't settle. There is a place for us alongside the Vanderbilts and Stanfords and USC's of the collegiate world. Rice's struggle should be to achieve that status and stay there.

Just my opinion and worth about what you paid for it.
03-21-2014 01:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NYNightOwl Online
NYOwl
*

Posts: 1,755
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: New York, NY
Post: #15
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
For those who don't yet donate, a solid argument could be made for donating to the annual fund merely out of self-interest. If more/all alums would make a donation, however large or small, it would improve our standing with both US News and grant makers/donors (who look at alumni participation), which in turn would boost the value of the degree.
03-23-2014 08:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RiceDoc Offline
Jersey Retired
Jersey Retired

Posts: 7,541
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 127
I Root For: Rice
Location: Tomball

The Parliament AwardsFootball GeniusNew Orleans BowlCrappiesDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #16
RE: President Leebron's spring letter
(03-23-2014 08:36 PM)NYNightOwl Wrote:  For those who don't yet donate, a solid argument could be made for donating to the annual fund merely out of self-interest. If more/all alums would make a donation, however large or small, it would improve our standing with both US News and grant makers/donors (who look at alumni participation), which in turn would boost the value of the degree.

Note that you can designate a donation to the Owl Club during the annual fund if you make the donation online. It is one of the dropdown menu items this year (for the first time ever, I think!). I requested this every year for about the last 20 years and it has finally happened! Please consider a small donation there when you donate to the annual fund too, if for no other reason than to avoid having it dropped off the drop down menu in future years! I note that this also reflects in the alumni participation for the US News when prior contributions to the Owl Club did not (I don't think). Thanks.
03-23-2014 09:12 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.