(03-18-2014 11:06 AM)TigerBill Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 10:17 AM)80sTiger Wrote:  Chris Vernon ‏@ChrisVernonShow · 2m
WHOA RT @GaryParrishCBS Auburn has reached an agreement with Bruce Pearl. He will be the Tigers’ next basketball coach

(03-18-2014 11:25 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 09:47 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 09:39 PM)mem-x Wrote:  "I like Josh but ..."
"I'm a HUGE Tiger fan but ..."
"I think JP's a great guy personally but ..."
"I really like the way Josh runs a clean program but ..."
"I hope Josh proves me wrong but ..."

There's something inherently stupid about these precursors.

how about.....Josh is great, nothing is wrong, what he does is perfect?

Each one of the passages I cited were real quotes. I have never once seen where anyone has ever stated that JP was "perfect."

If you're going to play with me, I require facts ... Not witty sarcasims and generalizations. Stay in your own playpen, Joe-joe ... Unless you can actually prove a point or defend a position.

I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here? By the way, "if you are going to Play with me". It just doesn't sound or read good. My little boys say dad, im going out to play, it sounds fine and they are little boys. When you say it, it sounds messed up.

(03-18-2014 11:28 AM)Tanyaskees Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:06 AM)TigerBill Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 10:17 AM)80sTiger Wrote:  Chris Vernon ‏@ChrisVernonShow · 2m
WHOA RT @GaryParrishCBS Auburn has reached an agreement with Bruce Pearl. He will be the Tigers’ next basketball coach

(03-18-2014 11:30 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:25 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 09:47 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 09:39 PM)mem-x Wrote:  "I like Josh but ..."
"I'm a HUGE Tiger fan but ..."
"I think JP's a great guy personally but ..."
"I really like the way Josh runs a clean program but ..."
"I hope Josh proves me wrong but ..."

There's something inherently stupid about these precursors.

how about.....Josh is great, nothing is wrong, what he does is perfect?

Each one of the passages I cited were real quotes. I have never once seen where anyone has ever stated that JP was "perfect."

If you're going to play with me, I require facts ... Not witty sarcasims and generalizations. Stay in your own playpen, Joe-joe ... Unless you can actually prove a point or defend a position.

I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here?

Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:30 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:25 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 09:47 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 09:39 PM)mem-x Wrote:  "I like Josh but ..."
"I'm a HUGE Tiger fan but ..."
"I think JP's a great guy personally but ..."
"I really like the way Josh runs a clean program but ..."
"I hope Josh proves me wrong but ..."

There's something inherently stupid about these precursors.

how about.....Josh is great, nothing is wrong, what he does is perfect?

Each one of the passages I cited were real quotes. I have never once seen where anyone has ever stated that JP was "perfect."

If you're going to play with me, I require facts ... Not witty sarcasims and generalizations. Stay in your own playpen, Joe-joe ... Unless you can actually prove a point or defend a position.

I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here?

Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:30 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:25 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 09:47 PM)Joe1 Wrote:  how about.....Josh is great, nothing is wrong, what he does is perfect?

Each one of the passages I cited were real quotes. I have never once seen where anyone has ever stated that JP was "perfect."

If you're going to play with me, I require facts ... Not witty sarcasims and generalizations. Stay in your own playpen, Joe-joe ... Unless you can actually prove a point or defend a position.

I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here?

Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

(03-18-2014 11:57 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:30 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:25 AM)mem-x Wrote:  Each one of the passages I cited were real quotes. I have never once seen where anyone has ever stated that JP was "perfect."

If you're going to play with me, I require facts ... Not witty sarcasims and generalizations. Stay in your own playpen, Joe-joe ... Unless you can actually prove a point or defend a position.

I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here?

Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

Your still posting on this?

(03-18-2014 11:57 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:30 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:25 AM)mem-x Wrote:  Each one of the passages I cited were real quotes. I have never once seen where anyone has ever stated that JP was "perfect."

If you're going to play with me, I require facts ... Not witty sarcasims and generalizations. Stay in your own playpen, Joe-joe ... Unless you can actually prove a point or defend a position.

I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here?

Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

Joe's fan doesn't do facts. Just not his thing.

(03-18-2014 11:59 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:57 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:30 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here?

Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

Your still posting on this?

Winner - MEM-X.

Sorry, Eric, you are now backtracking AFTER you got busted on the "perfect" post observation correctly called by mem-x. Backing out, once challenged, is childish indeed.

This is boss man and I approve this schooling administered by mem-x.

BTW, the REAL loser is Auburn. I'll give Sweathog 4 years to bring the wrath of the NCAA on the loveliest village on the plains. This is absolutely fantastic news. The SEC totally deserves this.

(03-18-2014 12:33 PM)boss man Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:59 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:57 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

Your still posting on this?

Winner - MEM-X.

Sorry, Eric, you are now backtracking AFTER you got busted on the "perfect" post observation correctly called by mem-x. Backing out, once challenged, is childish indeed.

This is boss man and I approve this schooling administered by mem-x.

BTW, the REAL loser is Auburn. I'll give Sweathog 4 years to bring the wrath of the NCAA on the loveliest village on the plains. This is absolutely fantastic news. The SEC totally deserves this.

I don't think he gets caught this time. He's read and studied 'Plausible Deniability' by John Calipari........

(03-18-2014 12:33 PM)boss man Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:59 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:57 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

Your still posting on this?

Winner - MEM-X.

Sorry, Eric, you are now backtracking AFTER you got busted on the "perfect" post observation correctly called by mem-x. Backing out, once challenged, is childish indeed.

This is boss man and I approve this schooling administered by mem-x.

BTW, the REAL loser is Auburn. I'll give Sweathog 4 years to bring the wrath of the NCAA on the loveliest village on the plains. This is absolutely fantastic news. The SEC totally deserves this.

You don't backtrack on sarcasm. that is stupid. there isn't any way possible someone who says "if you want to play with me" is the winner. the "perfect" comment was sarcasm. I thought most here would read it that way but, I guess not. I don't have to come up with some facts when dealing in sarcasm. His post was garbage, I doubled down on top of his garbage with some garbage of my own. Boss man don't get to call a winner on a message board, unless you guys are the type of guys that lose then say you won anyway.

(03-18-2014 12:33 PM)boss man Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:59 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:57 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

Your still posting on this?

Winner - MEM-X.

Sorry, Eric, you are now backtracking AFTER you got busted on the "perfect" post observation correctly called by mem-x. Backing out, once challenged, is childish indeed.

This is boss man and I approve this schooling administered by mem-x.

BTW, the REAL loser is Auburn. I'll give Sweathog 4 years to bring the wrath of the NCAA on the loveliest village on the plains. This is absolutely fantastic news. The SEC totally deserves this.

Couldn't disagree more. Great hire by auburn.

(03-18-2014 12:07 PM)cvilletiger Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:57 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:50 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:42 AM)mem-x Wrote:  

(03-18-2014 11:30 AM)Joe1 Wrote:  I'm not playing with you and do not want to. Responding to some garbage I see on a message board is my right. Dude, This is a message board. Not a play pen. I will quote you if I want to, respond to something I think is crap if I want. I do not have to nor can you make me prove or defend a point/position. Please refer to me as Eric if you will I would appreciate it. So where do you want to go from here?

Why would I refer to you as Eric when you call yourself Joe? And this place is certainly no more than a playpen ... Again, I maintain that the only time perfection was mentioned was by you a few posts back in order to be what you called ... Sarcastic. I suppose what I'm saying is that if you're going to respond to one of my posts, that response doesn't need to contain lies and embellishments to further an agenda ... Facts are welcome.

I guess you would refer to me as Eric since that is my birth name. How about this X, you do what you want and I will do the same. If you don't like it, suck it up, deal with it, or leave. As for an agenda, sorry dude, I don't have one. As for lies, sorry dude, I don't lie. Next.

Show me where someone other than your post in this thread alluded to JP being perfect ... At that point I will profusely apologize.

Somehow I doubt that you'll just come with the fact of your reference on this one.

Joe's fan doesn't do facts. Just not his thing.

I don't do facts?? Show me how I don't do facts. I will be waiting. No one does "facts" off of sarcasm. How do you produce facts when the original comment wasn't meant to be anything more than this ???

(03-17-2014 11:10 PM)Bluebeard Wrote:  

(03-17-2014 10:33 PM)cvilletiger Wrote:  I agree. NO NBA draft picks. But we expect to be a top 10 team every year.

Did you ever stop to think why they aren't NBA players? Our roster is loaded with top 100 recruits including 2 McDonald's AAs, yet none of them will ever play in the NBA.

Who is coaching them? Did you ever consider that may be where the problem lies? Of course not.

Think about it every time I see them play. They are not NBA players.