http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

Can we consolidate all of the ******* gosh damn gay threads.

I mean really. GIVE IT A ******* REST.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

nope.

thats a W for common sense and a L for right wing nuts

(02-26-2014 09:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  thats a W for common sense and a L for right wing nuts

that can be applied across this board....literally

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

Anti gay bill? I thought it was a freedom of religious conviction bill.

(02-26-2014 09:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

Anti gay bill? I thought it was a freedom of religious conviction bill.

If you and Eaglex want to ***** about the headline email USA Today...I didn't write it.

Already been covered in another thread.

(02-26-2014 09:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

Anti gay bill? I thought it was a freedom of religious conviction bill.

If you and Eaglex want to ***** about the headline email USA Today...I didn't write it.

now we understand why the headline is important....it's a spin on the spin

nobody reads past the first few sentences anymore.....the headline is what grabs the attention

it's a click click boom world.....better get used to it.....ain't going away....

(02-26-2014 09:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

Anti gay bill? I thought it was a freedom of religious conviction bill.

If you and Eaglex want to ***** about the headline email USA Today...I didn't write it.

now we understand why the headline is important....it's a spin on the spin

nobody reads past the first few sentences anymore.....the headline is what grabs the attention

it's a click click boom world.....better get used to it.....ain't going away....

Just remember, if you aren't Pro-Gay you're a BIGOT.

(02-26-2014 10:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

Anti gay bill? I thought it was a freedom of religious conviction bill.

If you and Eaglex want to ***** about the headline email USA Today...I didn't write it.

now we understand why the headline is important....it's a spin on the spin

nobody reads past the first few sentences anymore.....the headline is what grabs the attention

it's a click click boom world.....better get used to it.....ain't going away....

Just remember, if you aren't Pro-Gay you're a BIGOT.

If I understand this correctly, I have to give you XACLY! (I'm slow sometimes....been called out by a few, so a tad skiddish so to not offend )

(02-26-2014 10:19 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 10:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Anti gay bill? I thought it was a freedom of religious conviction bill.

If you and Eaglex want to ***** about the headline email USA Today...I didn't write it.

now we understand why the headline is important....it's a spin on the spin

nobody reads past the first few sentences anymore.....the headline is what grabs the attention

it's a click click boom world.....better get used to it.....ain't going away....

Just remember, if you aren't Pro-Gay you're a BIGOT.

If I understand this correctly, I have to give you XACLY! (I'm slow sometimes....been called out by a few, so a tad skiddish so to not offend )

The bill was called Religious Freedom Bill, The Pro-Gay press calls it the Anti-Gay bill thus my conclusion If you aren't Pro-Gay you must be a bigot. Any belief other than Pro-Gay is not allowed in the Freedom of Speech USA.

(02-26-2014 10:28 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 10:19 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 10:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:58 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  If you and Eaglex want to ***** about the headline email USA Today...I didn't write it.

now we understand why the headline is important....it's a spin on the spin

nobody reads past the first few sentences anymore.....the headline is what grabs the attention

it's a click click boom world.....better get used to it.....ain't going away....

Just remember, if you aren't Pro-Gay you're a BIGOT.

If I understand this correctly, I have to give you XACLY! (I'm slow sometimes....been called out by a few, so a tad skiddish so to not offend )

The bill was called Religious Freedom Bill, The Pro-Gay press calls it the Anti-Gay bill thus my conclusion If you aren't Pro-Gay you must be a bigot. Any belief other than Pro-Gay is not allowed in the Freedom of Speech USA.

...is what I thought and was my indirect point....thank you for the clarification

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

You know the bill was bad when Jan Brewer vetoes it.

(02-27-2014 01:08 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

You know the bill was bad when Jan Brewer vetoes it.

She actually used my argument with her press conference.

The bill seemed to be too broadly written, and could have unforeseen consequences involving customers and businesses in regards to religious affiliations.

(02-27-2014 08:40 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(02-27-2014 01:08 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-26-2014 09:22 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...l/5849187/

You know the bill was bad when Jan Brewer vetoes it.

She actually used my argument with her press conference.

The bill seemed to be too broadly written, and could have unforeseen consequences involving customers and businesses in regards to religious affiliations.

Agree, the bill should not be necessary. Religious freedom is already expressly granted by the constitution.