http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/20...e-location

Great.

Ever wondered what jumping the shark looks like? You hear the expression all the time, but it's always in the past tense; "XYZ has jumped the shark".

This is pretty much it, right here. The nfl is jumping the shark.

Innacurate and tendentious headline, by the way; "AZ law makes nfl . . . ". someone's panties are smoldering . . . just an unlovely construction.

considering this already happened once to AZ over something as trivial as MLK day

it's just more proof that you can not fix stupid with certain states

(02-25-2014 09:45 PM)EagleX Wrote:  Innacurate and tendentious headline, by the way; "AZ law makes nfl . . . ". someone's panties are smoldering . . . just an unlovely construction.

I'm not forcing you you to read/comment...you did that on your own.

In all the United States, only two states -- AZ and New Hampshire -- ever put the proposal for an MLK Day on the ballot for the voters to approve or disapprove. It was voted down in both states.

(02-25-2014 09:47 PM)john01992 Wrote:  considering this already happened once to AZ over something as trivial as MLK day

it's just more proof that you can not fix stupid with certain states

yeah. democracy. retards.

(02-25-2014 09:49 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:45 PM)EagleX Wrote:  Innacurate and tendentious headline, by the way; "AZ law makes nfl . . . ". someone's panties are smoldering . . . just an unlovely construction.

I'm not forcing you you to read/comment...you did that on your own.

I didn't force you to sensationalize the headline, either. But you did. the problem is that it's intellectually a bit dishonest, not that I read it.

(02-25-2014 09:53 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:49 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:45 PM)EagleX Wrote:  Innacurate and tendentious headline, by the way; "AZ law makes nfl . . . ". someone's panties are smoldering . . . just an unlovely construction.

I'm not forcing you you to read/comment...you did that on your own.

I didn't force you to sensationalize the headline, either. But you did. the problem is that it's intellectually a bit dishonest, not that I read it.

Opinions and ********...don't like my title? Don't click it.

(02-25-2014 09:57 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:53 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:49 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:45 PM)EagleX Wrote:  Innacurate and tendentious headline, by the way; "AZ law makes nfl . . . ". someone's panties are smoldering . . . just an unlovely construction.

I'm not forcing you you to read/comment...you did that on your own.

I didn't force you to sensationalize the headline, either. But you did. the problem is that it's intellectually a bit dishonest, not that I read it.

Opinions and ********...don't like my title? Don't click it.

yeah, that's exactly why we have these forums, and people post articles to them; so no one will ever read them.

don't screw with headlines, and no one will call you out for it.

(02-25-2014 10:05 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:57 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:53 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:49 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:45 PM)EagleX Wrote:  Innacurate and tendentious headline, by the way; "AZ law makes nfl . . . ". someone's panties are smoldering . . . just an unlovely construction.

I'm not forcing you you to read/comment...you did that on your own.

I didn't force you to sensationalize the headline, either. But you did. the problem is that it's intellectually a bit dishonest, not that I read it.

Opinions and ********...don't like my title? Don't click it.

yeah, that's exactly why we have these forums, and people post articles to them; so no one will ever read them.

don't screw with headlines, and no one will call you out for it.

It's my headline...you don't have to post in this thread if you don't like it.

(02-25-2014 10:18 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:05 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:57 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:53 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:49 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  I'm not forcing you you to read/comment...you did that on your own.

I didn't force you to sensationalize the headline, either. But you did. the problem is that it's intellectually a bit dishonest, not that I read it.

Opinions and ********...don't like my title? Don't click it.

yeah, that's exactly why we have these forums, and people post articles to them; so no one will ever read them.

don't screw with headlines, and no one will call you out for it.

It's my headline...you don't have to post in this thread if you don't like it.

it is indeed your dishonest headline. Not the headline from the story. and that's the whole point.

(02-25-2014 10:22 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:18 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:05 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:57 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:53 PM)EagleX Wrote:  I didn't force you to sensationalize the headline, either. But you did. the problem is that it's intellectually a bit dishonest, not that I read it.

Opinions and ********...don't like my title? Don't click it.

yeah, that's exactly why we have these forums, and people post articles to them; so no one will ever read them.

don't screw with headlines, and no one will call you out for it.

It's my headline...you don't have to post in this thread if you don't like it.

it is indeed your dishonest headline. Not the headline from the story. and that's the whole point.

Don't like my headline? Don't post in my thread...

(02-25-2014 10:26 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:22 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:18 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:05 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 09:57 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Opinions and ********...don't like my title? Don't click it.

yeah, that's exactly why we have these forums, and people post articles to them; so no one will ever read them.

don't screw with headlines, and no one will call you out for it.

It's my headline...you don't have to post in this thread if you don't like it.

it is indeed your dishonest headline. Not the headline from the story. and that's the whole point.

Don't like my headline? Don't post in my thread...

I quite enjoy posting to "your" thread. YOU are obviously the only one of us that seems to have a problem with me posting to "your" thread.

(02-25-2014 10:31 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:26 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:22 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:18 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:05 PM)EagleX Wrote:  yeah, that's exactly why we have these forums, and people post articles to them; so no one will ever read them.

don't screw with headlines, and no one will call you out for it.

It's my headline...you don't have to post in this thread if you don't like it.

it is indeed your dishonest headline. Not the headline from the story. and that's the whole point.

Don't like my headline? Don't post in my thread...

I quite enjoy posting to "your" thread. YOU are obviously the only one of us that seems to have a problem with me posting to "your" thread.

You're free to post where you like but if you don't like my headline...you don't have to post here.

You bring SO much to this conversation.

(02-25-2014 10:35 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:31 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:26 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:22 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:18 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  It's my headline...you don't have to post in this thread if you don't like it.

it is indeed your dishonest headline. Not the headline from the story. and that's the whole point.

Don't like my headline? Don't post in my thread...

I quite enjoy posting to "your" thread. YOU are obviously the only one of us that seems to have a problem with me posting to "your" thread.

You're free to post where you like but if you don't like my headline...you don't have to post here.

You bring SO much to this conversation.

Dude, you didn't think you were going to get lincoln-douglas out of "az law makes nfl ... Blah blah blah", did you?

I mean, it was an awfully low bar to begin with.

(02-25-2014 10:38 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:35 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:31 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:26 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:22 PM)EagleX Wrote:  it is indeed your dishonest headline. Not the headline from the story. and that's the whole point.

Don't like my headline? Don't post in my thread...

I quite enjoy posting to "your" thread. YOU are obviously the only one of us that seems to have a problem with me posting to "your" thread.

You're free to post where you like but if you don't like my headline...you don't have to post here.

You bring SO much to this conversation.

Dude, you didn't think you were going to get lincoln-douglas out of "az law makes nfl ... Blah blah blah", did you?

I mean, it was an awfully low bar to begin with.

I didn't make it for you...

I'm going to enjoy the end of this WSU game, talk amongst yourselves.

(02-25-2014 10:45 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:38 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:35 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:31 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(02-25-2014 10:26 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Don't like my headline? Don't post in my thread...

I quite enjoy posting to "your" thread. YOU are obviously the only one of us that seems to have a problem with me posting to "your" thread.

You're free to post where you like but if you don't like my headline...you don't have to post here.

You bring SO much to this conversation.

Dude, you didn't think you were going to get lincoln-douglas out of "az law makes nfl ... Blah blah blah", did you?

I mean, it was an awfully low bar to begin with.

I didn't make it for you...

I'm going to enjoy the end of this WSU game, talk amongst yourselves.

You always have to have the last word, don't you?

The NFL's first priority is protecting the shield. If this law is to pass, it would be a major PR punch if the NFL would still hold the Super Bowl there.